JT's Opinion

2011-05-18T07:58:00.001-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
May 18, 2011 Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

TIME TO SAY THANKS!

It's over....for now, anyway! We are referring, of course, to the 2011 Primary Election in our area. And, of course, there were “winners” and “losers”, but we don't look at it that way!

While the winning candidates will bask in their glory, too many of them forget that it was a myriad of backers, including family and friends, who got them there. Many will pat themselves on the back, but many others will try to lay the blame on everyone but themselves!

A case in point, of good campaigning, is the family and friends of Jason Shrive, a young lawyer, who made his first run at public office. Jason hit just about every fund raiser, for every candidate, and campaigned vigorously. He also benefited from the hard work and effort put in by brother Eric, a budding star lineman on the Penn State football team. Combined with the efforts of other family members, friends and “believers”, Shrive, a political novice, managed to pull off a big win. No, he wasn't alone, but he did gain our admiration and that of others, for waging a tough uphill battle. He was an “endorsed” candidate, but in Scranton, that can sometimes mean the kiss of death!

We stand and applaud this young group fior one hellluva win, and we also applaud the forces of Nathan Barrett, another big winner in the school board race. Barrett and his group played the “game” the right way and established a major base for future elections.

On the other side, there were candidates who believed the political bull that goes along with the territory and chose to let others do the hard work for them! One notoriously lousy campaigner, I choose to call him lazy, pulled off a big win, not because he is any great shakes, but because he had weak opponents and a dedicated crew doing his work for him!

There were other factions, well-known, who continue to let their egos get in their way and push hard, not for their candidates, but for their own edification! They are quick to jump to the conclusions that it was THEY, not their candidates and fellow campaigners, who made the major difference. They are also just as quick, if not quicker, to lay the blame for failures on everyone else. Ah, politics!

Anyway, we applaud all those who participated...,the little old ladies who came out to vote...the “backers” and the volunteer crews...the unheralded people who canvassed voters, handed out fliers, contributed small but important dollars, and the untiring efforts of so many who make the American democratic process what it is! The nameless folks who work so hard, and believe so willingly, in their candidates are the real winners! And lets not forget the maintenance men at the polling places and those who never get that pat on the back for hard work! GOD BLESS AMERICA! JT

2011-05-10T23:38:00.001-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-702-7905
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
May 11, 2011 Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

OUR PRIMARY ELECTION ENDORSEMENTS!!!

Tuesday, May 17th is primary election day! We hope to see a big turnout in our area! Voting is a privilege of our Democracy and we encourage everyone to exercise that right!

The following endorsements are JT's OPINION and we strongly urge you to vote for these candidates. We believe them to be the best qualified and most sincere and dedicated!

We are only including candidates who face opposition. Many have cross-filed and many are unopposed. Our endorsements are strictly our opinion based on information we have garnered and credentials and background. No other opinions are offered!

FOR COUNTY COMMISSIONER: Democrats: TOM FOX
ELIZABETH RANDOL

Republicans: PATRICK O'MALLEY
BILL JONES II

FOR COUNTY CORONER: TIM ROWLAND

FOR CITY CONTROLLER: ROSEANN NOVEMBRINO

COUNTY CONTROLLER: GARY DIBILEO

MAGISTRATES: PAUL WARE
BOB SHERIDAN

CITY COUNCIL: GIOVANNI PICCOLINO
JACK LOSCOMBE

SCHOOL DIRECTOR: (4 YR) JASON SHRIVE; NATHAN BARRETT, CHRIS
PHILLIPS; LYN RUANE & JAMES J. TIMLIN

(2 YR) SEAN O'SHEA & TOM BORTHWICK (write-in)

Please vote on May 17th and we urge you to vote honestly and sincerely for your next leaders. Please abandon the old-line party politics! JT

2011-05-05T08:17:00.001-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-702-7905
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

ATTN: PENN STATE FOOTBALL FANS

This special edition of JT's OPINION is to ask for your support for a very worthy program!

ERIC SHRIVE, former West Scranton H.S football star, and presently a Penn State football player, is seeking your support of the Penn State “Lift for Life 2011” program!

Lift for Life raises money for rare diseases, and this year's project centers on Kidney Cancer, a rare disease. Eric is Vice President of PSU's Uplifting Athletes and raised $ 8,500 last year. This year, his goal is $15,000 and we urge your support.

Please read Eric's Donation Page (below) and make your contribution! Thanks for the cooperation and consideration we know you will afford this request!
___________________________________________________________________________________

Welcome to the Donation Page of Eric Shrive
“Join me in my efforts to support Uplifting Athletes! Please help my teammates and I
raise money for the rare disease of Kidney Cancer. Last year I raised $8,500 and this year, with your support, I hope to beat that.” The goal this year is $15,000 and Eric wants to “thank you for your donation!”

Your donation, in Eric's name, may be made via Google Checkout. At present $ 125.00 has been raised, with another $14, 875.00 to go! Let's all help raise his goal, and possibly exceed it.

Penn State and West Scranton fans, along with all area fans of Eric Shrive can make this campaign a resounding success. For further info, or to make a donation, contact Eric or see the Uplifting Athletes page on his Facebook page.

Starting June 1st, a portion of pizza sales at Buona's Pizza, 504 N. Lackawanna Ave., Scranton, will be donated to Eric's Lift for Life campaign, courtesy of Giovanni Piccolino. Others wishing to join the program may contact us at JT's OPINION!

2011-04-20T09:40:00.001-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-702-7905
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

O.M.G....HOW VERY, VERY SAD!

IT TOOK LESS THAN 48 HOURS FOR US TO PROVE OUR POINT! That's right, dear readers, less than 48 hours to prove a point we've been stressing for over 6 years! Politics is a dirty game and people are duped on a regular basis!

In our last issue, we stressed that we had been duped! You bet we've been duped and so have all of us! No where, not in any way, shape or form did we mention any names or party, though we did imply that we would reveal just who and how we had been duped!

Well, our little blurb worked, and boy did it ever! Before Tuesday night was over, we fielded more than a dozen telephone calls, at least 10 e-mails and Lord knows how many hang-ups from people who refuse to use an answering machine!

Our newsletter said we expected fallout, and it came much sooner than we expected. The sad part is, most of the “outrage” came from people who aren't running for office and have nothing, that's right, NOTHING, to lose or gain, except their own inflated sense of being!

Let's set the record straight, once and for all! We are 100% behind our candidates, especially incumbent Councilman Jack Loscombe and candidate Giovanni Piccolino! We have attended too many fund-raisers and rallies for too many candidates, but have never wavered in our support for Jack & Gio! Do we totally agree with these candidates. Hell, no! But we do support them whole-heartedly and have not given any indication otherwise.

We also support other candidates, for other offices, but more on that as election grows closer!

Our policy has always been to stress that it is not WHO ATTENDS these rallies, but rather WHO DOES NOT ATTEND! Lip service and a pat on the back, a hearty “you've got my vote”, and the warm handshake and wishes for “good luck” are all a part of the process. Those gestures are to be taken with a grain of salt as any real political candidate knows. That, dear friends, is part of the “process”.

The only true sense of “knowing” is the final tally of votes on election night.

In any event, we wanted to clarify this fact before it gets too far out of hand! For those who called, irate and without facts, we are not “an S.O.B.” and the only thing YOU have to fear is your own ego! To the others, YOU'VE BEEN DUPED! Now let's hope you learned something new!
JT

2011-04-18T11:05:00.001-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-702-7905
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher
Mon. April 18, 2011

TIME FOR POLITICAL TRUTHS

The primary election is fast approaching (May 17th) and it is time that all of us (including this writer) face the truth of the matter. Politics is a very dirty game, and all of us can be fooled, including me!

It pains me to admit it, but I have been duped just as most of you have! That's right, this writer, who has prided himself on being an astute observer, has fallen into the trap of being “taken in” because of my own blindness. All I can say is, I let myself be duped because I sincerely wanted to believe that there really are some people who are sincere and honest and can boast of their integrity! Well guess what? I was taken in by a few, but despair hasn't set in. It has merely reinforced my determination to present an honest and fair assessment of those who seek political office!

For many years, starting before many of you were born, I have prided myself on being a good journalist, and have endeavored to produce publications which would be the epitome of honesty and integrity. Thankfully, I have been able to do so, but this is one of those times when I have to eat crow, and admit that I may have failed my readers along the way.

I guess it is because I let my pride and experience be compromised by a handful of charlatans when I should have know better. The end result, I deceived my readers because of my own stupidity in not seeing the handwriting on the wall. It has been right there, but I kept my blinders on and refused to see what was right in front of me...a pattern of deceit and extreme egotism so bright I fell for it!

My apologies to my readers and a promise that this situation is in the process of being corrected! YES, it happened right here in Scranton, and I let it happen. I sincerely hope that upcoming issues of this publication will serve to vindicate me as I do my best to correct any misleading information I may have provided you, in my quest to “want to believe” instead of using my experience and opening my eyes!

Beginning next week, with my eyes fully opened, and my head on straight, I will begin the process of examining the candidates for public office, offering my opinions, and hoping to set the record straight!

Starting with candidates for the higher offices, and ending with those for local Council, we will do our best to let the truth be known. Rest assured, there will definitely be some rattled cages, and many unhappy “campers”, but I firmly believe in our Democracy, and those who choose to subvert it, for political gain and self-satisfying ego-trips will be exposed for what they really are...egotistical asses who would trod on your sincerity to satisfy themselves. That, dear friends, is intolerable, and we will not abide this unconscionable attempt to “play act” in a very serious field of endeavor!

Politics is not to be taken lightly, especially since those who win elections are supposed to be trusted and honest folks, dedicated to serving the constituents who elected them, not their own egos and wants! As far as we are concerned, those days are over, and quite frankly, we are highly “p.o'd.” by the deception and violation of our trust, and yours!

There are candidates who are sincere, and truly want to serve the taxpayers, but there also is a small group which is more intent on stroking their own egos than in providing leadership which demands honesty and integrity. These are the folks who we will be exposing...those who place their own agenda above the that of what they propose in their diatribe. Unfortunately, some pretty decent people have been caught up in this web of lies and self-gratification, believing that their best chance to gain public office is by playing along with these charlatans.

It is sad, but those who are candidates, don't realize that their best bet is to be honest and forthright in trusting the voters, ...telling the truth and proving they really are dedicated to serving the needs of the people, not their mentors, or those who would manipulate them for self-serving purposes.

An old Chinese saying claims, “The best pillow is a clear conscience!” How very true!

We sincerely trust that you will pay close attention and will afford us the opportunity to correct the mistakes we have made in the past. This publication is dedicated to offering truth and facts, and we have never been sued or taken to court, in our many years of reporting. Though we present this publication as “opinion”, we do our best to check all our facts and determine the real meaning behind what we see and hear. That is, has been, and will remain our goal!

Before we can proceed with plans we had to expand, we felt that we must first correct the mistakes we made and go on from there. We have talked to those who wanted to “back us” and they agreed, our sincerity and integrity were what first led them to us, and after checking our credentials they were satisfied. We are not...at least not until we can correct our mistakes!

YOU, our readers, will be the determining factor regarding the future of this publication. We will not waver in our quest, and nobody, including political leaders, or those who think they are, will stand in our way. JT's OPINION will continue and will not be deterred by the “fallout” we anticipate when we unveil the truth about the political charlatans who want to run our government. Too many lives have been sacrificed in the name of Democracy, and too much blood has been spilled for us to give-in to any cheap, political shenanigans, especially those on the local level.

The future of our country, and our youth, is in jeopardy because of many in higher office. We cannot, and will not allow these people to mislead us on the local level. Being a big fish in a small pond carries as much a burden as those who aspire to higher office. The integrity of our political system is also the basis for the hopes and desires of our youth. Those who would tread on these beliefs must face the music. They have violated our trusts, and it is time they were made to answer for it!

JT

2011-02-24T15:40:00.001-08:00

Feb. 25, 2011 Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher ____________________________________________________________________________

TIME FOR TAXPAYERS TO ACT!

Okay, folks! It is time for the taxpayers of Scranton to put up or shut up! For decades we have known of, or at least heard of, corruption in this once glorious city. What had once been a city of pride and re-spect, has deteriorated into a city which is now the laughing stock of the nation!

We have seen the power of the people in the overthrow of corrupt regimes in Egypt, Libya, and other so-called “lesser” nations, while we have been content to sit back and whine over our plight. We have been witness to the corruption of our basic standards, the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, and we have chosen to accept such erosion under so-called “Home Rule Charters” and other “documents” which have done nothing but grant more power to those who seek to run our lives.

The power of the people has gotten to such a state that we no longer feel free to express ourselves or to demand what is rightfully ours, “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”!

Untold hundreds of thousands of American lives have been lost in wars which were fomented by power-brokers who sought to take away the rights of the people. These lives were lost because the people who fought in these wars wanted to preserve the integrity of the U.S. and the freedoms guaranteed us under our Constitution. BUT, we have allowed these very same power-hungry politicians to take away what our brave fallen comrades sacrificed their lives for. ENOUGH, ALREADY!

We have got to stop the greed and corruption which continues to permeate our society, and it is up to US, the citizens and taxpayers, to call an end to it all! We can and must act, before it is too late!

THE NEED FOR LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY

If one is to believe what the Scranton City Council is trying to do, then we, the citizens and taxpayers must rally behind these efforts and unearth the truth about our local government. Like the individuals on Council, or not, certain information has been presented over the past year, with the most recent indicating that there is indeed the possibility, if not the probability, that Scranton is rife with “vodoo politics” and that a thorough investigation is desperately needed in this city!

We have been relying on Federal investigators to do their job, but it seems they are not as alert as we would like to believe. The recent scandals involving Luzerne County judges is an example of what should and could be done, but it is incumbent on we citizens to demand action from our state and federal government agencies. That is the job of the investigators, and recent allegations of civic improprieties by our elected officials absolutely requires that those charged with investigating these alleged misdeeds do the job for which they are being paid!

The State Attorney General, the U.S. Attorney General, and our elected officials have an obligation, and are mandated to protect our interests, and to prosecute any corruption cases to their fullest! These are the assurances guaranteed us under law and our Constitution, and the reasons these jobs were created! It is high time for them to step in and conduct appropriate investigations.

We have allowed a dictatorship to take over our administration in Scranton! Our Mayor has placed himself above and beyond the ordinary citizen and caters to developers, lawyers, businessmen, and his cronies, while ignoring the rights of the citizens. Chris Doherty is not the first to believe he is above the need for accountability, but he is the “man on the spot” right now! He is out-of-touch with the mainstream taxpayer; ignores his duty to act as an elected official and seems to believe he is “anointed” as opposed to being elected.

He has lied to the public, made himself inaccessible to his constituents and has failed miserably as a leader and a man of honor and integrity. He refuses to publicly address any allegations; refuses to present himself to his legislative counterparts; and continues on his path of hailing himself as Scranton's Caesar!

This elected official has made it clear that he is so far out of touch that he ran for numerous higher offices after just having been reelected to his present one. His ego has gotten to the point where he is unfit to continue to “serve” the people of Scranton and it is time for him to step aside and let someone else take over the reins of executive power! If he doesn't, we need to step forward and seek his removal from office, for incompetence and malfeasance, either through impeachment or court action!

This city can no longer tolerate his antics and his indifference, while he caters to developers and others who benefit from his misuse of tax dollars, to the detriment of the general public. If indeed, he is guilty of misuse of funds, then by God let's get him out before he can do more and do it again!

It is time for H.U.D., the State of Pa. And the U.S. Dept. of Justice to step in and conduct a full and thorough investigation! Since we don't condone actual violent overthrow, we do encourage you to call or write your leaders: Gov. Corbett, Sen. Casey, Reps. Barletta and Marino, Sens. Blake and Yudichak,
Reps. Murphy and Smith, and everyone else who has the power to press for an investigation. If there is truly corruption in Scranton, it must be removed, and removed now!

CITIZENS NEED ACTION, NOT WORDS! AND IT IS UP TO US! YOU CAN FIGHT CITY HALL AND YOU SHOULD! THE POWER STILL LIES WITH THE PEOPLE, AND IT'S TIME WE EXERCISED IT! LET THE CHIPS FALL WHERE THEY MAY, AND FALL THEY MUST, OR WE'RE DOOMED TO MORE NONSENSE, BROUGHT ON BY OUR LACK OF CONCERN FOR OUR OWN WELL-BEING!

This is Scranton, Pa., not the Middle-East, and our focus needs to be directed on our plight! If those people can act, we can too, and if you choose not too, then by all means, HANG YOUR HEAD IN SHAME! OUR ANCESTORS, THOSE WHO MADE THE “ULTIMATE” SACRIFICE, AND OUR FUTURE GENERATIONS DESERVE OUR CONSIDERATION! AS THE MINISTER AT THE WEDDING SAYS...”SPEAK NOW OR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE!” Let's help our City Council to help us!
JT

2011-02-24T15:37:00.000-08:00

2011-02-18T11:28:00.001-08:00

Fri. Feb. 18, 2011

MAYOR GETS ACTION?

Picture this scenario! On the heels of consistent, but budget-busting snowfall in Scranton, Mayor Chris Doherty, bolstered by the return of Austin Burke, met with DPW Director Jeff Brazil and had a conversation which might go like this:

Doherty: “Jeff, those whacky citizens are crying again, about the snow fall and the fact the roads haven't been plowed. We need to do something about it!”

Brazil: “Chris, in all honesty, we don't have anyone who knows how to plow a street. We do the best we can, but it seems nobody can steer those damn plow trucks other than right down the middle of the road.”

Burke: “The streets need to be plowed, or the Mayor won't be able to get to his State of the City speech at our offices. This is too vital to ignore. The Chamber members need to know what is happening, or we'll lose out on all that “freebie” money from the government.”

Brazil: “What can we do? We already have an under-worked and overpaid staff trying to figure out a solution. It's just not as easy as everyone thinks. Sure, other cities and small towns in our area accomplish snow removal easily, but they must have an in with the “Big Guy upstairs” or it couldn't possibly get done.”

Doherty: “Well at least my street is clear, but what can we do to accommodate those lovers of that Blond witch and her 'doomers'? You know, that handful of radicals who complain about me not doing my job, or not being in touch with the “public”, whatever the hell that is!”

Burke: “Well Chris, I have a suggestion. Why not summon the “Big Guy Upstairs” to a meeting and lay the law down. After all, he has got a good job, and he probably wants to keep it. You know, do a little arm-twisting. After all, he only thinks he controls us, but we know better. Weren't you the one who created his job in the beginning? He can't be ungrateful to someone as smart and powerful as you!”

Doherty: “Good idea. What do you think Jeff? Should we call in our markers?”

Brazil: “Hey, why not. He works for nothing and if we need too, we can always call on Linda Aebli to give us a grant. She can always find funds. Maybe offer him enough money to take Mother Nature out to lunch, at McDonald's. That might work.”

Doherty: “Okay, I'll have one of my staff order Him to come to a meeting and we'll lay the law down!”

Brazil: “Should we have an open meeting, or just go along with the usual routine?”

Doherty: “Are you crazy? If we had an open meeting, that Blond and her cronies would want a copy of the minutes, and you know we don't ever do that. Next thing you know that bunch of “doomers” would be submitting F.O.I. requests, and then we'd have to call in our “media consultants” from the TT. We can't have that happening. Then we'd probably have to pay Carl more money and file a suit if we don't get our way. Just have to think this one out and put pressure on 'you know who'.”

Burke: “Okay, you handle it and let me know. We have to have that damn “liar's poker” meeting for the Chamber members. They'll buy anything we say. They don't vote here anyway.”

Doherty: “Done! Jeff, you run interference but make sure you continue to sell the “taxpayers”, is that the right term, that you are working hard to get the job done!”

THE NEXT DAY

Doherty: “Okay, GOD, the reason I called you here is that we have a job for you. Don't complain, because we both know that I created this job for you, and you'd better produce or I can find dozens of lawyers, or developers, who would love to take that job away from you! You certainly don't want my “media cronies” on your back! Understood?”

GOD: “Just what is it you want, Mr. Mayor? I don't need any threats from you, just instructions!”

Doherty: “Okay, we need snow removal, and we need it now, before we have a revolt. You know, like that mess in Egypt! If you have too, submit a voucher for payment, just not too much!”

GOD: “Not a problem! Of course I'll have to talk to Mother Nature. That's her realm!”

Doherty: “Just do it! And if she gives you a hard time, remind her of what happened to Gatelli and Fannuci when they didn't come through!”

GOD: “Okay, it may take a few days, but it will get done. Meanwhile, keep Brazil out front to block.”

SHORTLY THEREAFTER

The snow began to melt...the sidewalks and curbs became accessible...the handicapped crosswalks were open...and the City began to function again. The bars began to thrive again...the vacant offices and stores began to take on a new look (?) and the empty lots began to show signs of recovery(?).

Doherty: “See Austin, and Jeff, I did it. Now we can concentrate on the work at our shrine! Incidentally, don't forget, we need to change the name from Nay Aug Park to “Doherty's Legacy”, but we have to make sure those damned poor kids don't trample our beautiful playground. See if Linda can come up with some more cash so we can start to build that statue of me! It has to be done before too long because the natives are getting restless. I'll put Carl and my Authority directors on it. They can always figure a way to burn money! Just make sure Linda gets a plan ready!”

And they lived happily thereafter! Except the Blond and her cronies! JT

2010-12-13T17:34:00.001-08:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publish Mon.Dec.13th,2010___________________________________________________________________ SPECIAL EDITION

WELL HOW ABOUT THAT! THE SCRANTON CITY COUNCIL DID IT!

Not only did they introduce their own version of the 2011 budget, but they managed to cut it drastically, create jobs, and reduce taxes, if what we heard was true!

Too bad the previous Councils did not pay heed to Janet Evans' budgets when she tried to introduce them. Just think of how much we actually might have saved.

To resounding applause from the audience, the Council introduced their budget proposal at a public hearing, blacked out visually, due to prior commitments!

We cannot stress enough how gratifying it is to actually be allowed “in” on these crucial moves, an unprecedented event. The public actually knows what's going on, for a change! Chris Doherty, Judy Gatelli and Sherry Fanucci must be grasping for the aspirins after such an enlightening performance by “those” people!

Kudos to the entire Council, but a very special “Great Job” to Frank Joyce, Finance Chairman of the City Council. We haven't heard so many “o-o's” since my nephew broke his mother's favorite coffee cup!

The entire city owes this Council a debt of gratitude! We hope the “naysayers” will finally take a break from their “Janet bashing” and get a life! It's overdue!

NOW, if only it stands up and Chris Doherty finally admits he was wrong! We fully anticipate that “His Eminence” will initiate a court challenge.

Sorry, Virginia, but there really is a Santa Clause............. and it ain't Chris!

JT

2010-09-16T10:00:00.000-07:00

ECTV FIASCO

It is time for the fiasco surrounding the “alleged” contract with ECTV and the City of Scranton to come to a halt. If necessary, Scranton City Council should ask for a federal investigation of the circumstances surrounding the “awarding” of the cable TV contract. Comcast, the City Administration and service provider (ECTV) should be held accountable.

Either there is a legitimate contract or there isn't! In any case, it is the people of Scranton and the surrounding area who are getting shafted by this ongoing “joke”. The airways are governed by the Federal Communication Commission, and it is incumbent on somebody to step up to the plate and rectify what has become a farce.

The taxpayers of this area and the people who watch these two government access channels are getting the short end of the stick. Questions of what happened to the money awarded to ECTV; how that award came about; what it was used for; and who owns the equipment are paramount. Continuing questions over the legality of the awarding of the contract have gone unanswered and the quality of service (if any) is ridiculously poor.

While this political football is being kicked around, the viewers are suffering. A court of law should determine if there was indeed a “deal” struck between the City Administration and ECTV, and if it was, the true facts should be revealed. If it is ruled to be a valid agreement, then ECTV should provide the services they alleged to offer, not a rinky-dink offering while monies provided go unaccounted for.

From its inception, this controversy has been boiling and nothing has been done. Taxpayer money was supposed to be used to purchase equipment and to provide adequate service. The equipment is owned by the taxpayers, not the administration or ECTV, and an accurate audit of expenditures needs to be provided. The previous service contractor provided better than average service, with little or no controversy. The current contractor (ECTV) has been questionable since the very beginning with some principals bowing out before the service was awarded and a long-running stream of “back door shenanigans” has yet to be addressed.

Apparently, the Doherty administration felt justified in playing games with Scranton taxpayers money for political expediency. Many of the principals involved had questionable participation in the dealings and were allowed to set-up “headquarters” without regard to existing laws. Then a “move” was allowed and more money was sought to keep this charade going, but still no audit or explanation to the taxpayers and the City Council who is supposed to oversee these things.

Let's get the ball rolling, folks, and resolve this problem now! End the crap surrounding this situation!
JT

2010-09-11T10:35:00.000-07:00

JT's OPINION
jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher
Vol. 5 No. 36 Sept. 11, 2010

BACK TO PRINT & NEW FORMAT

Thanks to the generosity of a valued reader and a few friends, JT's OPINION will be back on “the streets” in the very near future. We anticipate that the “new” 4 page publication will be ready to go for the beginning of October, just in time for the upcoming general election. Naturally, we will be spending time learning how to apply the new format since it is “new” to us, but it will be ready to go soon!

In keeping with our previous policy, when we published under the “SCRANTON-AT-LARGE” name, we will be distributing newsletters at some old venues and will be seeking new venues as well. Anyone who wishes to make our newsletter available to their customers should contact us at the above address.

We will also be carrying a limited number of ads, to offset publication costs, and we will carry political ads, which must be paid for in advance! We've been stung before and that will not happen again! The “nickle and dime” con artist who reneged on his “bill” will be exposed to the public since he is once again running for political office. Look for that info in an early October edition.

VITAL ELECTION UPCOMING

On November 2, 2010, Pennsylvania voters will be asked to elect a new Governor, and several other Federal and State officials. This is a very important election, especially for the voters of Northeast Pennsylvania, and we will do our best to present a look at all the candidates. In the interim, we would like to clarify some points for “confused” voters, which seems to be the case in many instances!

Number 1: This is a General Election and if you are an eligible voter, you may vote for any candidate, regardless of party affiliation. Unlike the primary elections, where you must vote according to your designated party affiliation, you are allowed to vote for any candidate, without restriction. Many voters seem to believe that they are restricted to their own party designation. Again, this is not the case.

Number 2: Don't be afraid to ask any candidate a question! Your vote should be cast for the candidates who best represent you, not themselves or their party. Treat the candidates as you would anyone else who is seeking to “sell” you something. Ask yourself, “Is this what I really want, and is it going to better my life, or am I being a “compulsive shopper”? Just because a candidate tells you something, it isn't necessarily true and office seekers have been known to lead people astray. Ask questions and be satisfied with the answers before you cast your vote. Your future depends on the actions of these candidates, not their words. We have seen what happens when we “buy into” rhetoric and then await the results. In most cases, things change drastically after the election. Actions speak louder than words and be absolutely sure you are buying what you want, not what someone is trying to sell you! Make sure you get your money's worth (the right candidate). There are no guarantees and no refunds!
Number 3: If a candidate is running to replace someone who is “retiring” or leaving office for some other reason, be sure you are not electing a “clone”! In most cases, the “new” candidate, of the same party, is nothing more than a hand-picked replica of the outgoing office holder. Who picked this candidate? In the majority of cases, that candidate was chosen by the very people responsible for the previous office-holder's election. If you want change, be sure you are getting real change, not a rehash of previous elected officials' diatribe.

Number 4: Read over the sample ballot, and vote YOUR conscience! You won't get a second chance and what you vote for is what you will get! We repeat, be absolutely sure you are not being sold a bill of goods because a candidate allegedly represents your party affiliation. If you bought into all the campaign rhetoric which is being thrown at you, you would have to vote for each and every candidate named on the ballot. Find out the facts, not what a candidate tells you. Past history proves that campaign rhetoric is often a distortion of the facts, and the truth is usually hard to find. Again, don't be afraid to ask questions and to demand proof before you vote against someone based on “allegations”.

Number 5: Remember, YOUR future and the future of your children, property, and welfare are at stake. It is incumbent upon you to be an informed voter and to elect the right candidates to do the job! You don't go to the grocery store to buy a pair of shoes. Don't be swayed by promises. Look at what has happened in the past by electing those who promised but never delivered. It's your call, not theirs!

WE WILL BE MAKING ENDORSEMENTS

In the coming weeks we will be studying the candidates and their platforms. Prior to the election, we will be endorsing certain candidates, based on our analysis of the best one for the job. We will also explain our reasoning and we hope we can assist you in making your decision. We will also endeavor to determine whether or not a candidate is honest and sincere, or if that candidate is merely “spouting off” and who he really represents. Does he have YOUR interests at heart, or is he just representing those who would be “power brokers” and representing the interests of those who would benefit from your tax dollars? Is he honestly seeking office or is he just entering the race to be a representative of those who seek to retain, or to gain power? These are questions you should be asking yourself, and we hope to assist you in making those determinations.

The days of true “party loyalty” are over! What the two major parties once espoused no longer holds true, and one only needs to look at recent results to prove that! The “party line politicians” have been “flip flop” artists for a long time and there really is very little difference between the two factions. It still boils down to who and what the candidate represents. Just look at the recent indictments, convictions and pending criminal cases and you'll get a better understanding of the situation. None of these “officials” represented you, and we can't let that policy continue! It is too important to ignore!

We urge each and every one of you to study the actions of the candidates, look at their background and history, and look at their associates! Are they truly going to represent the people, or are they going to continue the policy of pandering to their friends and the powers behind them? The days of getting rich at the expense of the people should be ended and it is up to YOU, the voter, to make it happen!

We don't want you to take our word for anything, just examine the facts as they are presented! We have been doing this for a long time and we feel we have the expertise to dig deep and come up with the truth. If you truly want better government, which is honest and sincere, make it happen. Your vote does count, and every vote you cast means the other guy must get two to offset your vote! It can happen, if YOU make it happen! JT

2010-09-02T11:07:00.001-07:00

VOTE YES FOR NEW LIBRARY

After considerable study, we believe we have devised a plan which would enable the City of Scranton to build a new library, as proposed by the Mayor and previous Council. We encourage the City Council
to afford our plan a very close look and to resolve this issue by voting YES!

In order to appease all parties involved, including the previous Council, we propose that the “new library” should be built in the recommended area of South Scranton and could be named the “Clueless In Scranton Memorial Library”, in accordance with the grandiose plans of the Mayor and his cohorts, including the previous Council. It would be divided into three sections: Fiction, Non-Fiction and Reference, with the heaviest emphasis on fiction, in keeping with Scranton politics.

The fiction section would include a “promises” section and would include literature based on P.E.L., O.E.C.D., Chamber of Commerce and Mayoral rhetoric over the past few years. This would include a section on “business opportunities” in Scranton; how to get funding from taxpayer monies and a section on how to fail in business without trying. Of course, a section on how to get “connected” in Scranton would be a must, and would include a list of developers, lawyers, and “astute” businessmen who have milked the system to the verge of bankruptcy. How to apply for and receive K.O.Z. Status and another area of “expertise” by the crack team of Doherty-Burke & Gobbledegook, designed to take entrepreneurs through a step-by-step process of getting funding, followed by a step-by-step process of how to skip paying the funding back. And a full-color section on vacant store fronts and buildings!

Also included in the fiction section would be a complete list of Doherty accomplishments, including the Tree House, and all the other accoutrements which has made the Doherty Playground (er, Nay Aug Park) the shining star which is designed to induce people to move here, work here, and invest here and to create new jobs (now approaching 7,000 according to His Honor (?)

A Judy Gatelli section would include how to work a full-time job(?), attend Doherty-sponsored functions, and pull it all off with a smile, or tears, determined by the particular circumstances. An expert's opinion on “acrimony” would be the highlight of that section. The Sherry Fanucci section would include her “Dear Abby” approach to all public business, especially that of dealing with those pesky voters and others who questioned her “dedication and involvement”. This “paragon of virtue” has amassed a great following, as was evidenced by those “followers” votes in the last election.

Bob McGoff could be highlighted by his “Howdy Doody” approach to all matters, tempered by his inability to give a straight answer to any question. A retired educator, he is a master at that art!

In the non-fiction section, we could include all the input and activities of the new “Library Board”, that
group of individuals groomed to preserve the image of the Doherty years. This would also include their plans for the destruction (er revitalization) of the City's plans for the future (?).

Of course the reference section would be a major factor. We could include documentation of the “revitalization” of Scranton; a section on how to turn a million dollar plus surplus into a $350,000,000 deficit in two terms, and a section on how to run unsuccessfully for higher office while collecting a salary for performing (i.e. acting) as a “dedicated” elected official; how to live on $50,000 dollars a year, with a $550,000 mortgage, sending your kids to preferred schools, and running all over the state while maintaining a “progressive” administration and a better -than -average lifestyle.

We would also include a section on the Sewer Authority, Housing Authority, Parking Authority, and other “undercover” operations which parallel the C.I.A. in disclosing information to the public. There would be documents outlining the lawsuits filed by the Administration and its cronies against the city (previously okay but now a “no-no” ), how to thwart efforts to treat vital service groups (fire & police) like pawns while catering to DPW, and how to pat yourself on the back with one hand while reaching into taxpayers' pockets and shaking hands with potential voters.

Needless to say, a section on how to be “qualified” to hold insider jobs without credentials would also be included. And, let's not forget, the “how to stack a deck” to suit your needs; even including info on how someone could slip up and let the “other side” get the upper hand. Not to forget, that vital area of information on how to get the monopoly media to promote your “integrity” while maintaining their own “journalistic integrity”, no small feat in itself.

By our calculations, the entire library collection would fit into four or five shoe boxes, and would only require about a 3 x 5 foot area. The entire cost of the new library would be subsidized by charging the users in the low-income area a daily fee of $ 3.00 per person, and would be included in their tax bill which would be administered by a “private” tax collection agency. A tree could be planted (taken from some “blighted” property), and a flower area could be included as part of the beautification. Of course the floral arrangement would be put to good use following the funeral of some poor taxpayer. (Why waste anything?). And let's not forget the rotating tower which would be lit-up for all to see!

The entire cost of the project to taxpayers would approximate $ 1.37, if we use used shoe boxes, and the cost of the required plaque with all the names would be absorbed by Austin Burke and the contributions of Doherty Disciples. We are sure the Grand Opening, which would be held at the site, would include all our “outstanding” citizens and the reception would be held outside the city limits, where taxes are considerably lower and you can still find a good meal at respectable prices. Perhaps Bob Mellow would be happy to chip in a few bucks for a section on how to wheel and deal in the real estate-rental market, and other “retiring” politicians would be happy to donate to the cause, if there is a way it wouldn't come out of their pockets.

Needless to say, Lee “In My Opinion” Morgan could be the new librarian and Doug Miller could be his assistant. That way they could both be involved, sans seeking elective office. Incidentally, the SLC Taxpayers Association would not be allowed to solicit money to offset the cost of poor kids using the library. This could prove to be another embarrassment to the Administration.

Best of all, there would be a section on how to be a non-profit, take property from the citizens, and cry all the way to the bank. All this while planning new and bigger ways to rip off the taxpayer. Still time for that one to develop into a major “sect”ion. Just look at the Mulberry St. “beautification” plan!

How about it Council? Isn't it worth a try? Surely you can see its merits! JT

2010-08-29T09:50:00.000-07:00

ET TU, BRUTUS

What a pleasant surprise to open the newspaper (?) and find a built in newsletter for us. Thanks to the Lynett-Haggerty “Bible”, we were able to quickly discern that there are indeed a dual set of principles which govern the City of Scranton!

While concentrating on the actions of Council Solicitor Boyd Hughes, and his alleged double standards in suing the city while an employee, the “Bible” forgot recent past history, which certainly set a precedent. One only needs to reflect on recent shenanigans by the forces of Mayor Chris Doherty (an obvious disciple of the late L. Ron Hubbard) whose questionable abilities as a science fiction writer led to a whole new cult. If there is any question regarding the comparison, let's try to clarify them.

Doherty, the leader of the Nay Aug Park cult, has been screwing (er, suing) the city for years, in his capacity as leader of the pack. Multi-hundreds of thousands of dollars have been spent on legal actions to force the city's firefighters and police into servitude for the Doherty forces, while awarding pay raises to the administration and, of course, DPW, without question. Job creation has been a mainstay of his administration, especially on the “unqualified, but friend of a friend” platform.

In spite of arbitration awards, and a continued pattern of “I Am The Boss” rhetoric, Doherty has cost the city untold tax dollars in his pursuit of “beatitude”. His follies, in local court cases, are legend. Not only is he willing to sue at the drop of a hat, but he seems to relish the fact that he has made several personal friends (make that attorneys) fairly wealthy men, at the expense of the taxpayer.

His moral judgement is far less than they would have you believe. Didn't he, as Mayor, try to dissuade a former Councilman, from tendering a resignation following allegations of moral misdoings? And didn't that Councilman resign anyway, over the protestations of Sisters Judy Gatelli and Sherry Fanucci, both of whom were disciples of Lord Doherty? At least that Councilman had the dignity to resign, even though he did accept a better position at higher pay.

And wasn't it His Holiness Doherty who ignored the fact that a few thousand dollars would have opened the Capouse Ave. pool for the use of the poor kids in that neighborhood, due to a “lack of funds”, while once again displaying fireworks at Nay Aug Park for another “well-meaning” cause?

And isn't it His Holiness Doherty who manages to come up with taxpayer dollars to fund more bars and subsidize more restaurants which haven't a ghost of a chance to survive in an over-taxed, over-priced central City which has trouble differentiating between the “good of the people” and the “welfare of cronies”? And isn't this the same snake-oil salesman who produces thousands of jobs which nobody ever sees? Of course without his shill (Austin Burke), he has trouble thinking and speaking at the same time. Hang on, Chris, Austin isn't that far away, for now. That over-inflated salary is too inviting!

Now, let's examine Boyd Hughes and his dual (?) actions. He represents City Council as Solicitor and also maintains a private practice. One of his clients chooses to sue the City over problems associated with a piece of property severely damaged by a fire and the erosion of the sloping hillside, probably caused by rain and fire damage. The fact that the site is owned by a “cult” is irrelevant. Mulberry St. and the Hill Section apparently have been ceded to a different “cult” by the City, and this “cult” has a member of the Mayor's family on its Board.

The suit is against the City and the Scranton Sewer Authority, which, like other “cults” keeps its books closed except for the Mayor's private viewing. Similar to other City Authorities, this group controls millions of dollars of taxpayer money, but is a part of Scranton's “Closed Society”, not open to the public whose money supports this “sect”.

Let's examine another aspect of the Boyd Hughes dispute. Isn't a member of the Prosecutor's Office considered a public employee, and wasn't it just recently that we had a Council Solicitor who also served as a member of the Prosecutor's staff? And wasn't that public servant also supposed to represent the Council in any actions, including giving advice to Council members? Was any “conflict of interest” brought up when Judy Gatelli, as a sitting Councilwoman, filed suit against individuals for “perceived” threats, and wasn't that same “solicitor” offering advice to her? Was that a violation of legal principles? We are not implying that that attorney represented the litigant, but his advice was certainly sought and received. Where were the questions then?

As for the correlation between a “religious cult” and any legitimate business they may own, where is the question between the Jesuit-run University of Scranton and its take-over of taxable properties; its closing of public thoroughfares for construction work; and its decimation of private businesses for its own edification? And what about the questions asked of sitting Councilman Bob McGoff, another Doherty-disciple, who advised the public that the U was only widening a sidewalk, while lines (water, sewer and electrical?) were laid beneath the “widening? The lone sitting “Doherty disciple” certainly could have elaborated but that is not the Doherty line. That line consists of “dazzle them with your brilliance and baffle them with your bulls---!” Ah, Scranton, the “eccentric city” with all the answers, except how to stop wasting taxpayer money while patting yourself on the back!

All we can say is, “Give 'em hell, Boyd and do your thing”! If it hurts, don't hesitate to dig into your bag of tricks and shove “payback” down their throats. And, if the Lynett-Haggerty clan doesn't like it, too bad. They don't complain about the gazillions of dollars they rake in on “legal ads”. And please, don't forget their “journalistic integrity”, most of which is gleaned from the “office” at N. Washington Ave. and Mullberry St., or from the internet. Yeah, we do read the internet daily, then we read the same story in the “news” two or three days later! Journalism at its finest. Especially when you're the only game in town!

Of yeah, before we forget, does anyone else have the perception that the election season has begun, even before anything has been said about the upcoming McGoff-Loscombe campaigns for reelection in 2011? Can Chris be grooming Dougie to run against the Evans-led “super majority” to hopefully (for him) regain “control” of the City? Or Judy, or someone else to unseat Loscombe? And how about the continuing “attacks” on the “Comp Queen”? Talk about gearing up early, Doherty certainly has been busy! Look for another over-abundance of candidates to offset the 2011 “open” primary campaign. Orkin must be hard at work trying to get them to come out of the woodwork!
JT

2010-08-25T00:38:00.000-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

WHEW! WHAT A RELIEF!

Thankfully, the “Powers That Be” in Scranton have determined that our “beautiful Downtown Scranton” area needs to be further enhanced by the opening of another bar. How else can the citizens of this community expect to preserve their image?

The former Molly Brannigan's (take the money and run) will now become a Mexican Restaurant (?) owned and operated by another Irish Pub owner. How lucky can we get to have such astute leadership? For a while we thought they might do something stupid like allow a full-service restaurant, quality retail store, or even a much-needed consumer-friendly outlet which would serve the people of Scranton.

Of course that would have gone against the grain and put Scranton in an unwanted light...i.e. a city which is on the rebound. We aren't sure yet, but it is highly possible the “new” business will be known as La Cantina Dublin, or some other appropriate title in keeping with the goals of our city's leadership.

Just imagine the new job creation possibilities. An added police presence, to keep in line with the goal of “saturation” of the downtown area. Of course with only a handful of bars in the area, what is it up to now, something like 18 bars in a five square block area? And this could be billed as another step towards making our city user-friendly to “visitors” while further enhancing our image as the new “Lushville”, and just in time for the upcoming St. Patrick's Day parade. We might even consider having St. Patrick's Day celebrations every other weekend, rather than putting all our eggs in one basket.

And just think of the image we project to the rest of the nation....the boozing capitol of Northeast Pennsylvania.! Now that is one that every parent should study when considering a university to which they could send their kids. Not every town can boast of having a bar for every student, which is apparently the goal of our city leadership.

Can you imagine the congestion at the corner of Lackawanna and Adams? It could rival the Linden St. block between Washington and Adams as impassable three or four nights a week. Another place for our police department to park their cars and show a presence, along with buses, cabs, and limos, as well as tipsy “visitors” who can enjoy our “progressive” city. Think of the possibilities? We could add another police station, an emergency room for drunks and fight victims, and we might even be able to cut back on rendering services to the rest of the community.

Can there be any question about the image Scranton wants to project? Think of the possibilities that might develop! We could have the “Albright Memorial Bar & Grill” at the corner of N. Washington & Vine; turn the DeNaples Center into a night club; buy the Cathedral and turn it into Wyoming Ave.'s finest bistro, and on and on. And all this with the capable funding of the O.E.C.D. and the Scranton Parking Authority and our leadership, not to mention turning it all into K.O.Z.'s.

The Chinese have a very appropriate saying: “Management is doing things right; Leadership is doing the right things”! Is anybody listening?

Oh, and by the way, can anybody find a place in center city where one can get a cup of coffee and a sandwich after 3 p.m.? And we don't mean fast food places!

BAKER'S D-DAY APPROACHING

Interestingly enough, David Baker, former Scranton Housing Authority Director, is slated for trial, or at least jury selection, on Aug. 31st, at the Federal Courthouse in Wilkes Barre. The long postponed case will probably result in a plea bargain, or at least a lot of people hope so, and may just scare the pants off a lot of those who area “awaiting” the outcome. The SHA “buyout”, er settlement of Baker's lawsuit, should have bought a vow of silence, but we really question whether or not he will choose to serve time rather than blow the whistle on some of his colleagues.

The fact that an “agreement” was reached just doesn't hold water. He got his money, and what he wanted, but we seriously doubt that the Feds are going to cave in and let the disgraced former SHA Director slide. In view of the recent turn of events in Luzerne and Lackawanna County, it just doesn't make sense that they are going to let him off the hook...at least not without getting something out of it!

DOUBLE STANDARDS AGAIN!

City Council solicitor Boyd Hughes is under fire by the administration because he is representing a client in a lawsuit against the city! Is this really an issue? Has anyone forgotten how much “legal representation” was afforded previous Council members by a Council Solicitor who also serves the District Attorney's office? Was Judy Gatelli's “lawsuit” any different?

And how about the local solicitors (I just love that term...reminds me of a hooker) who have gotten rich representing our Mayor in his lawsuits against the City? Weren't they on the payroll? And didn't they sue the police and fire unions over such miniscule things as fair and equitable wage determinations handed down by arbitrators?

And how about the fact that the Mayor is involved in so many “University” decisions, which favor the U, even though his wife is on that body's Board of Directors?

Oh, sorry, we forgot! The double standard only exists when it comes from the opposition! My bad!

SILLY SEASON ABOUT TO GET UNDERWAY, AGAIN!
\
Election time is fast approaching, and we can't wait for September to open the “silly season”. Of course our local political candidates will wait until the last minute, though national races and major campaigns have been underway for some time.

City council will resume operations next month, and the usual candidates will again seek offices for which they are not qualified. But since when has that had anything to do with Scranton. We have a history of unqualified candidates, some even get elected, and the results are always predictable.
JT

2010-08-07T11:50:00.000-07:00

EVANS-LOSCOMBE CONSPIRACY

The “truth” is finally being told...by no less an authority than the local newspaper. Janet Evans and Jack Loscombe have been engaged in a major conspiracy!

Mrs. Evans, City Council President and a 7 -year veteran of the “political wars” has been leading a crusade to...Heaven forbid...keep the citizens and taxpayers informed. This obvious ploy is being utilized by her to overshadow her image as Scranton's “Comp Queen”! The only thing that hasn''t been “substantiated” is that Mrs. Evans has been seen lugging 100 lb. sacks of coal, on each shoulder, while trying out as a linebacker for the Philadelphia Eagles. “Sources” claim that she has been doing these tasks late at night, to avoid the crack journalists who have been watching, and documenting, her every move. Of course, the truth be known, Evans has gone against the standard acceptable practice of keeping the Scranton citizenry in the dark. What can she be thinking?

As for Loscombe, who was appointed to fill the unexpired term of Bill Courtright, there is little question that he has been at the forefront of toeing the “Evans Line” of transparency in government. Is this the same guy, who as a “retired” fireman, is milking the system simply because he was seriously injured on the job, in an incident which literally melted the tires on a city fire truck? Is this the same guy who narrowly escaped death when the apparatus touched a high-tension power line during a fire? Just where the hell does he come off expecting an injury like that to merit a disability pension from the City he served in a high-profile, and extremely dangerous, position as a paid firefighter?

Now these two, Evans and Loscombe, are being paid to serve their City in an elected capacity! They are accepting money for public service to their community! How dare they! And, to top it off, they have the nerve and audacity to try to keep their constituents “informed”! Are they trying to undermine Scranton politics as we know it? Obviously they are.

Mrs. Evans even has the nerve to try to let the taxpayers know where their tax dollars are being spent, and how money-saving tactics can be implemented to help Scranton emerge from a “distressed state”!
Loscombe, who obviously doesn't have an ounce of brains in his head, has the unmitigated gall to introduce graphics and words, easily understood by the citizens, in an effort to support his agenda to bring the city and taxpayers into the limelight of transparency in government.

Not only that, but the citizens and taxpayers who attend Council meetings, especially the Legion of Doom (a one man operation headed by Bill Jackowitz) are allowed to “question” Council actions and are even afforded the opportunity to get answers. What the hell is going on here? Do these people really believe that the “radicals” who pay the bills are entitled to know what their government is doing? Well, I never heard of such outrageous conduct in the “Eccentric City”, er, excuse us, Electric City!

There can be little doubt that if it weren't for the forces of the local media, this City might actually be coming into the 21st century. Are these “politicians” trying to destroy Scranton's one step removed from “hillbilly and turnip truck” image? Do they really think they can upset the plans of Chris Doherty to turn this coal mining town into a boutique city, rivaling Paris, New York and other of the world's great metropolitan areas?

And now their latest attacks on those “paragons” of virtue, the “non-profits” who they expect to pay a fair share of the cost of reaping huge profits in our glorious city. Next thing you know they will be spearheading efforts to rescue Scranton's “serfs” from captivity, and expecting the recipients of K.O.Z's and O.E.C.D. loans to actually pay back taxpayers' monies. Of all the misguided efforts of the Evans-Loscombe pairing, backed by Pat Rogan and Frank Joyce, this is the ultimate straw to break the camel's back. Next thing we know, they'll be forcing the developers, lawyers, land-grabbers and absentee landlords to pick up a portion of Scranton's growing deficit. What can be next on their agenda?

We couldn't agree more...it is time to reign in these “vultures” and wrest control away from the local taxpayers and back into the hands of our “leaders”. Former Councilwomen Judy Gatelli and Sherry Fanucci must be seething at what this group of “super majority” radicals has taken away from their previous agendas. Look at what they are doing to the image of Chris Doherty and Bob McGoff, those two eminent “dinosaurs” of the past who still believe the citizens should be kept in the dark!

Yes, our local media, who answers to no one (?), especially their friends, is doing a bang up job. If it weren't for their “watchdog” tactics, and timely “exposes” of the “corruption” of the “politics as usual” mentality, Scranton might emerge as a city on the path to recovery.

Just think of the consequences if that should happen. All those “idiots” who voted for Janet Evans (and there were a lot of them); and the “dummies” who actually learned something from the presentations by Loscombe and Frank Joyce; and the true believers who want to see Scranton get back on track, might just be able to afford to keep their homes, their jobs, and their kids in this area. Heaven forbid! What can these people be thinking?

Thankfully the minority of Scranton citizens, those who would see the likes of Doug Miller, Lee Morgan and other astute and dedicated politicians (?) take command can expect the backing of the local media. After all, they are the “true” leaders of this city, depending on which side they happen to be on at the time. The thing they learned from Chris Doherty, i.e. how to run for Governor, Lt. Governor, State Senator and Mayor, all at the same time, should prove invaluable to that type “leader”. They can count on Judy Gatelli and Sherry Fanucci to guide them on “how to win friends and influence people”, and the fact that is is possible to hold office, make a living off selling to non-profits, and having family strategically placed on Boards of Directors. These are lessons not everyone can learn.

And by all means, let's not forget the “inbreeding” which offers the best jobs, the highest paying ones, and the prestige of being on the “inside”. Everyone knows the “closed society” which permeates the “plush jobs” available in this City are “earned” at the hands of the political leaders! Why would anyone want to change things and make this city a better place to live. Forget the ongoing Federal “corruption investigations”! What could those “outsiders” know? This isn't Wilkes Barre or Luzerne County! Ah yes, how everyone yearns to return to the past; the dark ages of modern society! Anyone disagree?

JT

2010-07-27T07:34:00.000-07:00

BAKER CASE STALLED AGAIN

The on again-off again trial of “ousted” Scranton Housing Authority Director David Baker was put off again, for the umpteenth time, as a last minute motion for delay was granted. The trial, in Federal Court, Wilkes Barre, had been scheduled for jury selection Monday, but a motion for further delay was granted just before the trial was slated to begin. As of 3 p.m. Friday, the trial was on, but apparently legal maneuvering took place again, leaving the disgraced former SHA Director's case in limbo.

As of Monday morning, no new date has been set! Baker was indicted on 16 counts by a Federal Grand Jury and was suspended by the SHA. Following a prolonged period of being paid, (for time accrued, including sick time?), Baker filed a civil suit against SHA citing his “suspension without due process”. A unanimous vote by the SHA Board of Director awarded Baker $5,333.33 per month for 30 months, plus paid medical benefits for he and his wife until they reach the age of 65. The “award” was made one week short of Baker's scheduled trial date in June, in “the best interests of the Housing Authority”, according to the SHA Board's solicitor, Paul Paterson.

Ah, yes, the American “justice” system, NEPA style!

EVANS, LOSCOMBE UNDER FIRE BY “MEDIA”

Obviously the campaign to re-elect Bob McGoff to the City Council next year is underway, and the attempts to discredit Janet Evans and Jack Loscombe, a member of the Super Majority on Council has begun to take form. Loscombe and McGoff are both up for election in 2011.

There is no doubt that Mayor Chris Doherty is going to pull out all the stops to re-eelect Mcgoff, and to unseat Loscombe, thereby removing the “super majority” from the equation. Smart move, but so obvious it reeks. At least a little “mystique” could be employed, but the powers of the local media, who are known to be personal friends of Doherty, couldn't wait.

In the seven months since the Evans-led Council has been sitting, the voting public has been kept informed, with graphs, clear definitions, and documented facts, something unprecedented during the “Doherty-engineered” council years. In his two years on council, McGoff has never given a satisfactory explanation for any of his pro-Doherty votes and actions, supported by defeated former Councilwomen Judy Gatelli and Sherry Fanucci. What had been a circus-like atmosphere by the previous council has taken a much-needed turn toward a local legislature in tune with the people. Apparently, this does not sit well with our local “media”.

At least under the Evans-Loscombe-Rogan-Joyce majority, citizens know what is going on and are more informed than they've ever been. Now it is going to be up to the voting taxpayers to decide whether or not they want to know or would rather continue the “that's the way its always been” mentality of Scranton voters.

ECTV OFF ON A RAMPAGE

ECTV, the “officially” anointed caretaker of Mayor Chris Doherty's interests, is now crying foul over anticipated funding from Comcast revenues, under scrutiny by the Council.

Crying “wolf” because their “funding” is on hold and questions over the Doherty blessings which installed them as providers of local TV programming are being asked, the “powers” at ECTV are whining about the perceived injustice of the actions.

They seem to forget that they were given the “rights” despite two other proposals which made more sense, both economically and common sense-wise; two very sound proposals, neither of which was considered pro-Doherty.

To claim the Evans-led Council is trying to “torpedo” ECTV is ludicrous when one considers that it was Doherty and former Councilwoman Judy Gatelli who sought their ouster from City Hall, and that it was Mrs. Evans and her efforts which brought the cameras back into play.

Numerous complaints about ECTV have been lodged, and most are well-founded, yet the “group” which heads this venture continues to plead that they are being victimized. SURE!

PEL TO MEET IN PUBLIC CAUCUS

The Pennsylvania Economy League forces are slated to meet with City Council tonight, at 5:30 pm, in a public caucus, to explain to Council why the city remains in a distressed state and what “solutions” can be employed to revitaliz the city's depressed economy.

This astute body will probably propose tax increases on an already over-burdened taxpaying populace, but will more than likely not address the need for reigning in Scranton's continued giveway to “institutes of higher learning” and the dissemination of OECD funds for questionable business needs.

It remains to be seen if any logic is involved in their proposals since the obvious solution is to STOP SPENDING MONEY WE DON'T HAVE! Under the “watchful eye” of PEL, Scranton, and Mayor Doherty, have continued to dig a deeper economic hole with a free-spending policy designed to “entice” new business and industry into our area.

Of course it would never occur to these folks that we can't keep the businesses we have due to the uncontrolled spending policies of this administration, and the fact that no businessman with an ounce of common sense wants to move into the area only to find they are “losing” business. Perhaps the answer is to remove all business from Scranton and to subsidize bars, churches and colleges. They seem to be the only ones who are anxious to move here.

Oh yes, and let's put the blame on the County and also the folks who didn't want to see the SAPA proposal become a part of our scenario. Obviously, all the blame goes on everybody but the City Administration and our Mayor! Maybe we could use another newspaper too! JT

2010-07-24T11:39:00.001-07:00

WE CONFESS! WE'RE DUMBFOUNDED!

Yep, we admit it! Just when we thought we had seen it all, we come across something which must approach “ the incredible”! Join me in looking at this scenario and see if you agree!

A couple of years ago, the Feds raided the offices of the Scranton Housing Authority, one of our prestigious autonomous bodies, which answers only to the Mayor. In that raid, the Feds confiscated enough material, including mirror images of computer hard drives, and later, depositions from Housing Authority employees which resulted in a 16-count Federal Indictment handed down against then Housing Authority Director David Baker. The indictment includes charges of misuse of government funds, racketeering and several other counts, all of which were allegedly substantiated.

Baker was summarily suspended, but he was allowed to collect his salary for nearly two years, for “time” he was owed, including sick time and time he did not take off. He was also barred from contact with the S.H.A. and its employees, and was not allowed on any SHA properties.
\
His case was set for trial in Federal Court on numerous occasions over the past two years, and was postponed for varied and sundry reasons. About three months ago, Baker's “paid vacation” ended when his “alleged pay for accrued time” was exhausted. Shortly thereafter, Baker filed a civil lawsuit against the Housing Authority, claiming he was “suspended without due process”. Perfect timing?

Paradoxically, Baker was scheduled to go to trial again on June 21st, but the Board of Directors of the SHA, in its infinite wisdom (?), decided at its monthly meeting, just one week prior to the scheduled trial date, to vote unanimously to award Baker a settlement of the lawsuit, “in the interest of the Housing Authority”, which amounted to a monthly stipend of $5,333,33, for 30 months, and medical insurance for he and his wife until they reach the age of 65. According to our calculations, that amounts to a $160,000 settlement, plus the cost of medical insurance. Nice deal!

Now, according to the Federal Courthouse in Wilkes Barre, where his trial is slated to get underway on Monday, June 26th, at 9:30 am, (as of Friday at 2 pm), jury selection is scheduled to take place.

When queried during that meeting, SHA Board solicitor Paul Paterson, continued to cite the settlement was “in the best interest of the Housing Authority”, and would not elaborate.

Now, the situation gets interesting. Solicitor Paterson, at the “public” portion of the meeting (the closed executive session is held one hour earlier}, introduced the proposal to settle the lawsuit, then produced a signed agreement from Baker, in which Baker agreed to the terms. No explanation of how Baker managed to sign the agreement which was introduced, nor when he signed it, nor could Paterson explain why the Board agreed to the settlement just one week short of Baker's trial. He continued to reiterate that the agreement was “in the best interest of the Housing Authority”.

Even though the Feds are allegedly still investigating the Housing Authority, and Baker's trial could have been, and should have been the end, the SHA voted unanimously, and we stress unanimously, to settle the case.

When questioned further about the appearance of the “settlement” being tantamount to nothing more than a “buyout to assure Baker's silence”, (what do you think?) Paterson continued his one-line answer, “it is in the best interest of the Housing Authority”.

Apparently, somewhere along the line, we missed the entire point! It was, and is, our belief that if a person is indicted for a crime, that person should be suspended and prevented from acting on behalf of his employer, especially if he is the sole judge of the use of funds which belong to the Housing Authority and the Federal Government. Should Baker be convicted, he certainly should not have any grounds to sue the Housing Authority, yet the Board, and Paterson, were “hell bent” on settling this matter before Baker's trial. Again, what about Baker's timing on filing the suit, and the settlement?

One can only assume, and accept, the appearance of a “paid buyout” to “insure Baker's silence” on these matters, and it certainly leaves numerous questions as to the rush to settle the civil suit just one week before his trial, and only a short two or three months after the suit was filed.

The sad part of the whole “deal” is that since Baker and the SHA have a signed agreement, Baker could renege on that signed agreement and still implicate others in his “alleged crimes”. Another question is simply, where the hell were the Feds while all this was taking place? Are they blind, or did they just choose to ignore these actions in favor of getting the trial over? Or, is there more than meets the eye, and could further fallout be pending? Let's see what takes place as the “investigation” continues.

In the interim, we are left with the perception that something is radically wrong with the whole thing, and though we are not lawyers, we can't help but feel that there is more to this “quicky” solution than just paying the man for “earned time off”. Especially with the expediency shown by the SHA!

More is sure to come from the “ongoing” investigation into Scranton's involvement in alleged corrupt practices, and we would hope that this “incident” merits continued probing. However, unless there is some further explanation, we are left with no choice but to believe that the expression “Only in Scranton” is a truism.

Perhaps once the situation is explained in detail, by some legitimate entity, we will tender an apology for our dis-belief, but until that happens, we will stick by our stance that there is something amiss here! We can only hope that this “ongoing” investigation will be just the tip of the iceberg in correcting what is wrong with Scranton and the NEPA area. Too much is unexplained, and less is explained by the appearance of clandestine operation of our public trusts by our political leaders. Somewhere, somehow, there has to be an answer and a solution to these ongoing problems. Come on Feds, do your job!

We don't need to continue to be stressed out in our distressed city! Something needs to be done, and soon! This is not an episode of “The Office”...it is the real thing! Let's get with it!

JT

2010-07-22T13:42:00.001-07:00

WHO IS BLOWING SMOKE? EVANS OR PILARZ?

The continuing controversy over the part Scranton's “non-profits” should play in our city is getting to a serious stage of name-calling, unbefitting an “alleged” Catholic Institute of Higher Learning and an educator/politician.

Jesuit Scott Pilarz heads the University of Scranton and claims he must care for the welfare of 5,000 “paying” students at the “U” while Mrs. Evans was elected to care for some 70,000+ taxpaying residents of the City . The University takes in over $160 million dollars a year in tutition fees alone, while the city takes in far less than that. The “U” is acquiring more and more land which is then removed from the tax roles. The city loses more land to “non-profits” and realizes less taxes each year, to the detriment of the taxpaying citizens.

The “U” makes a “donation” of approximate;y $105,000 annually, in lieu of taxes, while the city provides the “U” with police, fire, sanitation and other vital services, which most likely exceeds the “contribution” made by the “U”. Pilarz claims the “U” provides some $411 million annually to the economic community of this city, while Mrs. Evans points out that this is a fallacy since few students shop in Scranton, or spend cash in this city. Most of them spend their cash at pizza parlors, fast-food outlets and bars, while spending their cash in Dickson City or outside the city, as do many taxpayers who can't afford to, or won't, shop in Scranton.

Citing the “economic impact” of one-time permit fees, Pilarz, and Mayor Chris Doherty (who incidentally made his money from a family-owned business which sells to and caters to the “religious” community), play “monopoly” at the expense of the over-burdened taxpayers of this community. If the “U”s economic impact is so great, why does “beautiful downtown Scranton” resemble a ghost town. It is virtually impossible to find a restaurant or business in this city which is “flourishing”, and the vacant stores and buildings are a testimony to this statement. Lackawanna Ave. and the Steamtown Mall, which are further testimony to the “economic impact” on our city, are prime examples of a dying city.

Fostered by a local media, which is known to be pro-Doherty; the “elitists” who rally to Doherty's side, though he has proven to be a “flip-flopping” political charlatan; an over-priced city hall staff and large battery of lawyers and “advisors” who have achieved financial success thanks to their “leader”; and a plethora of “autonomous authorities” which answer to none, other than the Mayor, all add to the major problems we have in this city. The “U” has joined in the pillaging of Scranton, and continues to do so.

Mrs. Evans, and her “super majority” on Council, were voted into office after 4 years of disgust with the likes of Judy Gatelli, Sherry Fanucci and Bob McGoff, all of whom are known to be Doherty patsies. True, Mrs. Evans has been on the council for some 7 years, but to take her to task for doing nothing until this latest term is ludicrous. During her previous two terms, she was stymied by a 3-2 vote in favor of everything and anything Doherty wanted. Every attempt she made on behalf of the citizenry, including introducing her own budget, was thwarted by the “majority”, and she, along with then Councilman Bill Courtright, were rejected in their efforts to bring sanity to city politics.

Scott Pilarz, on the other hand, is supposed to represent St. Ignatius of Loyola and others, including St. Francis Xavier and Bl. Pierre Favre in their professed vows of poverty. They subscribed to the Ignatian Retreat, or “Spiritual Exercise”, including a 4 week period of silence and directed meditation on the life of Christ. The Jesuits profess to be flexible and to meet the needs of the people, and claim they are dedicating themselves to service and humility as part of their final vows. They allege they are also “Imitating Christ”.

In my 70+ years of life, I was always under the belief that Christ led his life to serve his God and the benefit of the people, including those who were downtrodden, and in need. I don't ever remember the Bible, in any version, speaking of taking food from the mouths of the hungry; taking their property to enhance the standing of the church; ignoring the needs of the over-burdened and the elderly; or forcing a community into the verge of bankruptcy by acquiring needed tax-producing properties to the detriment of the taxpayer. This is not the way of the Christ I was taught to believe in and it certainly does not exemplify the Christ I want to follow.

Through the years there has been much written about the Jesuit agenda, including “The Black Pope”, stories of the Vatican Assassins and other disparaging stories, including collusion with the Banksters, the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Bronfmans, and the Biderbergers. There have been stories of Jesuit alliances with Hitler, and others who would do away with the way of life professed by Christ. I do not want to believe any of these stories, but a certain degree of hypocrisy has crept into my mindset and the continued actions of the Jesuit institution, and certain political leaders, does little to dispel these questions in my mind.

The continued attack on the distressed citizens of this community, and the numerous orchestrated attacks on Mrs. Evans and our city council members in attempts to discredit them is deplorable. I may not always agree with them, but I do praise them for at least attempting to give control of our government back to the people, and out of the hands of the charlatans, hucksters, and leeches who prey on the poor working people who are being forced out of our “boutique community”. If Scott Pilarz and his “dedicated” brethren really want to help this city, let them produce tangible evidence that they are dedicated to more then the edification of the “U” and the land grab at the expense of a distressed body of taxpayers.

We realize the Jesuits are dedicated to education and higher learning, but we cannot accept the diatribe which goes along with their so-called “dedication to the Imitation of Christ”. Let them, and their backers, ask the age-old question, “What would Jesus Do?” I personally don't think he would sacrifice a way of life to build more buildings and to displace thousands of people. Perhaps Pilarz would show us the “contributions” the “U” has made to the welfare of this community and to tending to the needs of the poor taxpayers, the homeless and the needy. Or maybe he can show us the checks that are written payable to “God” and “Jesus Christ”. Better yet, show us the true plans which were formulated in the
“widening” of Mulberry St. sidewalks, and what was “planted” and why” under the “new sidewalk”. I assume this was done with the blessing of City Hall, and those of the Doherty Administration.

Bless you all, in the name of Jesus! You probably are going to need it when your time comes!
JT

2010-07-22T13:42:00.000-07:00

2010-07-18T23:38:00.001-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

TIME TO STAND UP TO THE FACTS!

It is now 60 years since the beginning of the Korean War, which technically is still ongoing since no pact was ever signed ending the conflict. Yet, after all the rhetoric; the managed news emanating from blow-hard politicians; denials and a dearth of public apathy; the fact still remains that there are over 8,000 U.S. soldiers listed as M.I.A. (missing in action) and a stalemate over attempts to find them or their bodies exists due to indecision by our own government.

YES! Our own government! Thanks to the mismanagement of the war by those in charge, beginning with Gen. Douglas MacArthur, and continuing to this day, we are still at war in areas where we have no business being; have no tangible reason for being there; and certainly have no strategy for ending that war, nor the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The fact that we are doing nothing to find M.I.A.'s or to recover bodies long lost, is a disgusting display of the U.S.'s inability, or rather insensitivity, to the facts of war. There used to be a standard quote: “Men are expendable...equipment is not!” Well, the first still holds true to those who are alleged to be leaders. The second part of the quote is not true. One only needs to examine the tremendous amount of military equipment lost, or abandoned by the U.S. to unravel the fallacy of the quote. Hundreds of millions of dollars are left on the battle fields, either because of disrepair, or just plain abandonment. Much of this equipment is in the hands of former enemies who now use that same equipment against our fighting forces.

The real tragedy is that the people who wage these wars, politicians and over-inflated egotistical military “geniuses” just don't give a damn about the thousands of lives lost. The blood of untold thousands of young American lives has been spilled to satisfy the egos and the wants and needs of those “in charge”. In case you haven't noticed, very few offspring of political leaders or “command officers” are lost in combat, and we have a recent history of Presidents and higher ups who were, in effect, draft dodgers. Yet these are the insensitive clods who are so willing to sacrifice American lives for their own self-gratification and to add to the coffers of “war mongering big businesses” who only claim “concern” when the rug is pulled out from under them.

It doesn't take a brain to be a politician or a four-star general. All it takes is the money to “purchase” enough votes, or the political ass-kissing to achieve rank. Somewhere along the line, these folks make it to the top and become our “leaders”. In the interim, sacrificial lambs (young soldiers) are literally slaughtered, and, as in the case of the 8,000 M.I.A.'s in Korea, abandoned when the smoke clears.

How sad that a draft-dodging political leader can get the finest medical treatment (free of charge) when he has the slightest hint of a cold, or a military commander can retreat to a hospital when he sneezes,
yet those who are doing the fighting for him are wounded, killed, and often left “out in the cold” when they are captured by the enemy, or in an area deemed “unsafe” to chance rescue operations.

Finally, someone is speaking out for these lost souls, especially those of the “lost battalion” in Korea. They were the victims of shoddy management, lackadaisical planning, and the reluctance of politicians to get involved in things they knew nothing about to begin with. They are the real victims of war, along with the hundreds of thousands of poor and uninformed civilians on the “enemy” side in any war.

The Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq; attempts to defeat the Viet Cong after years of fighting and the final sensible withdrawal of French troops who could not defeat that “enemy”; the stupidity of going to war in Afghanistan against hundreds of warlords who want nothing to do with a unified government and soundly beat the hell out of the Russian Army for years; while playing “footsy” with neighbors who delight in the fact that we are helping their economies grow is typical of our government and what it has become. We are being used as patsies by the rest of the world, and for what, to grow bigger and better war industries in our own country, and to outsource jobs to other countries while we ravage our own society through military conflict and economic “opportunity”!

We still haven't resolved the needs of our own people after the Hurricane Katrina disaster, despite billions of dollars being raised for their rescue. The Haiti Relief fund has accumulated more billions of dollars for relief; and now we are faced with another American economic disaster in the Gulf region due to the greed and mismanagement by oil companies and our own environmental protection agencies.
Can anyone explain where these “donations” and billions in U.S. Funds have gone and what the problem is? Can you tell me why our own American G.I.'s have been forgotten by all but their own immediate families and a handful of sincere, caring private groups? Who's minding the store?

The answer is very simple...we don't have, and haven't had, a leadership which can make immediate decisions, nor can do so without resorting to decisions by “committee”! The individual “man in charge” no longer exists, because the “man in charge” doesn't have the guts to make a decision in fear of losing his job! Pres. Harry Truman made a long-overdue decision and fired one of the most popular military commanders of our present day. He dumped Douglas MacArthur after the fiasco in the early stages of the Korean War, and after finally realizing that the “general's” agenda was to set himself up as the “boss” of Japan following WWII and the eventual “personal guardianship” of Korea. Where the hell is Harry Truman now that we need him? There isn't another one in sight to take his place!

It's time for politicians at all levels, local, state, and national, to stand up and take charge. We can't afford to placate these people anymore, and we certainly can't afford to keep losing our youth in wars that should never take place. We may be the richest and biggest of the world's powers, but we certainly aren't the smartest. It's time we picked out the real decision makers, and the real movers and shakers if we want to save our cities, states and nation. Money and name-recognition aren't doing a damned thing for us and its incumbent on the American public to step up the plate and face the challenges.

Most of all, it's time we stood up and forced the issue. Let's get our M.I.A.'s or their bodies back to their own home towns and let's begin to treat our servicemen and women with the respect they deserve.
Stop indulging in self-praise for political accomplishments and show us the ”moxie” it takes to take care of our own. Local, state and national leadership should be earned, not bought and paid for by a bunch of cronies who want to get rich off their front men. Get a life, America! Take care of our own!
We don't expect miracles, and will probably end up on some “watchdog” list, but to hell with that. It's time to do what's right, and if that's what it takes, we don't fear being singled out as radical. Isn't that what the First Amendment is all about? JT

2010-07-14T10:05:00.001-07:00

THE REAL STORY !

Tonight's City Council meeting was probably the most honest and forthright session since we have been attending over a five year period. The lies and innuendo against Janet Evans and the Council majority were laid directly at the feet of Rev. Scott Pilarz and the University of Scranton, best known by us as “The Golden Octopus”.

Maligned and condemned by the local media, and those who subscribe to that concocted diatribe, Mrs. Evans and Councilman Jack Loscombe, supported by Solicitor Boyd Hughes, “set the record straight” with an awesome presentation of the true facts involving the allegations that Mrs. Evans attempted to “extort” money from the “U” in lieu of taxes.

The three had been in attendance at a meeting with Pilarz at his office at The Golden Octopus. Factual evidence was presented indicating that it was Pilarz, not the Council president, who had made overtures to up the “U”'s contribution in order to obtain the right to erect an aerial crossover from that body's proposed new “apartment complex” for students. Pilarz had offered to up the $105,000 annual payment to the city to $165,000. He later acknowledged that he had made an offer of $175,000 to Mayor Chris Doherty, which Doherty at first denied then changed his mind and agreed, he had had discussions with Pilarz.

Mrs. Evans had asked for $250,000 suggesting the “U”'s offer was too low for the amount of city services they are provided. According to the presentation, Mrs. Evans never proposed the approval for the overhead walkway was contingent upon the suggested increase to $250,000.

Hughes asserted that he had had talks with the “U”'s attorney and a counter-proposal of $220, 000 was made by the U, who later agreed to increase it to the $250,000 level for four years. This proposal was later rescinded by the U due to what was deemed the “board's” refusal to go along.

The presentation, capably and adequately presented to the public, was backed up by charts, statistics and maps, along with a fact sheet showing the tuition and extra fees the U charges its students. Mrs. Evans, Loscombe and Hughes all agreed that it was Pilarz, not Mrs. Evans, who brought the “aerial right-of-way” into the discussion.

Local media had laid the “blame” on Mrs. Evans and tried to discredit her for the alleged “extortion”
claim. The presentation by the trio clarified the “distortion” and the Council trio took umbrage with the local media for attempting to malign Mrs. Evans and to distort the facts.

Highly professional, and beautifully orchestrated, the Council group was loudly applauded and won the approval of the audience. More will follow in the next issue. JT

2010-07-14T10:00:00.001-07:00

OH MY GAWD !!!

Can it really be true? Did the “forces” find a chink in Janet Evans' armor? Is it really possible that Mrs. Evans had a slip of the tougue and the “antis” were astute enough to catch her? And why not? While they didn't invent it, they sure have mastered it over the years, and poor Janet slipped up!

There is no question in their minds that the Council President should be impeached, tarred and feathered and by all means, run out of town. How dare her challenge the sanctity of the “Golden Octopus” and the other non-profits who have been ripping off the citizens of this city for so long.

Come on, people, get a life and face the realities of what has been going on around you for years! If you just came out of a long and deep sleep, or if you really have been in a coma, wake the hell up and face it. The taxpayers have been footing the bills for these “non-profits” for decades. Every inch of land grab they make adds an additional burden to the taxpayer.

As Councilman Bob McGoff so astutely noted recently, the “U” is being maligned for their gracious contribution to Scranton society. The “sidewalk” widening on Mulberry Street, was a “blessing” for taxpayers, and was designed only to accommodate the students and “beautify” Mulberry St. The fact that a large hole was excavated, what appears to be sewer lines and electric lines buried, and the disruption of a busy intersection (reduced to approximately 2 and ½ lanes) and another “alleyway” installed has nothing to do with another land grab by “Rev. Scott” and his dynasty. After all, isn't it the “U” which contributes so greatly to the economy and the health and welfare of Scranton's taxpayers?

Let it be noted, incidentally, that the “U” opted to offer to increase it's payment in lieu of taxes to some $175,000 annually. That is no drop in the bucket to a “non-profit” which realizes some $183 million a year in tuition revenue alone. Of course the other student “contributions” aren't factored into the equation. Surely, so generous a contribution for the disruption of the city during the school year, the furnishing of city police and fire services, and the “contribution” of students to our economy (read that as bars) should be noted. And let's not forget Lackawanna College, another esteemed “non-profit” which contributes only a part-time student, full-time athletic populace to our city, sans any contribution in lieu of taxes. And the hospitals and other non-profits who donate “zilch” to our tax base.

Surely, Mrs. Evans is way out of line to even suggest that the 32% of the city property owners (non-profits) should help to pay their fair share of taxpayer's expenses. After all, isn't it incumbent upon the taxpayers to support these poor folks who “contribute” so much to our fair City? To hell with the little guy who can't afford to paint his house, the senior citizen who faces foreclosure because they can't pay their bills, and the loads of residents who don't enjoy non-profit status but must contribute to our growing $400 million plus deficit. And how about the removal of “blight”, which is at taxpayers' cost, and the gobbling up of these properties once they are deemed “fair game” for developers and the “in” crowd.

Let's not forget the OECD “giveaway”, which continues on a regular basis. All of this money could be used to further enhance the CITY, not the businesses which benefit from these monetary “donations”. I can't believe that our leadership would dare to question the “charity” of the city administration and that of these “poor” non-profits. For shame, Janet Evans. And for shame the Council majority. No shame!

THE BAKER “BUY-OUT”

In a little over two weeks, the other shoe is scheduled to fall for former Housing Authority Chairman David Baker. On July 26th, Baker is scheduled to appear in Federal Court (Wilkes Barre) for jury selection in his “supposed” trial on a 16-count indictment for various felony violations. The Scranton Housing Authority voted last month to offer Mr. Baker a $5,333.33 monthly stipend, for 30 months, along with paid medical benefits for he and his wife until they reach 65. This was accomplished after “much deliberation” by the Board, one week before his trial had been set, then postponed.

Strangely enough, Mr. Baker, who was not present, had signed the “agreement” before it was even presented to the Board. When queried about the “offer”, the best the Board could do was unanimously approve the agreement, citing the “betterment of the Housing Authority”, as the reasons for the action.

Since Mr. Baker already has a “signed agreement”, perhaps the Board is now praying that he will not offer any “names” to the Feds, or take anybody else down with him, should be take a “fall”. Ah, how remarkable that the Board has such faith in its disgraced former Director. Very Refreshing!

CAMPAIGN 2011 ALREADY UNDERWAY

Isn't it remarkable that the campaign for election in 2011 is underway when the 2010 general election is still a little less that 4 months away. Mr. McGoff (under the aegis of Mayor Doherty) is already making a run (quietly?), and it is rumored that Gary DiBileo is going to seek the seat held by County Controller Ken McDowell. Of course, Councilman Jack Loscombe is expected to run for election to a full term, and we still anticipate Doug Miller and Lee Morgan will enter the race for “something”. Fortunately, they can't enter the Presidential race since that is still some two years away.

Rumors are that former Councilwoman Judy Gatelli may also try again, as a Doherty-supporter, to try to counter Mrs. Evans' “super majority”. Look for the Doherty forces to pull out all the stops to reelect McGoff and to unseat Loscombe. They may even be desperate enough to run former-councilwoman Sherry Fanucci, who made her mark as “spokeswoman” for the Doherty regime during her term.

Is it possible there is a candidate who is not related, not-connected, or not-beholden to anyone who might make a run? It would appear that Scranton's “in-breeding” criteria holds true to form based on what goes down as local politics. Just think, (unimaginable of course) that an “outsider”, capable of thinking on their own, should run. What a precedent that would be...a real challenge to our “closed society”...of course, that will never happen! Or could it?
JT

P.S. Yes. We're still around and still active!

2010-07-14T10:00:00.000-07:00

2010-07-04T13:13:00.000-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

WHY I DO WHAT I DO !

Several readers have questioned me as to why I do these newsletters and what I gain from them. I will attempt to tell you the why, and what, of it in the following paragraphs.

To begin with, I do these newsletters because I love doing them, and that has been my profession for a great number of years. I honestly believe that an informed public is necessary for preservation of this great country, and I point to the fact that a free press is non-existent in many areas of the world. One only needs to look around and you will see that so many “societies” exist onltyin the minds of their leaders. The people have little or no input into their government and what it does or does not do.

I have lived and worked in many areas of this country and have encountered many sad states of affairs. In so many of our states and cities, and towns, a handful of people control what goes on and what effect their control has on the people. I liken it to the shepherd who controls the flock, contingent upon the sheep dog who is well trained and responds to his master's commands. There are many “shepherds” in the guise of politicians, who control vast number of sheep (people) who are herded by a handful of “sheep dogs” (those who act on command of their shepherd”). It is this vast array of sheep (people) who complain to each other but are literally scared to death to confront their leadership, rather choosing to live in fear and intimidation. Fortunately, I am not one of those people!

I have been accused of many things, including being a “glory whore”, by a local bean counter who passes himself off as a journalist. Fortunately, for him, I attributed his stupidity to his lack of experience and his youth, plus his fear of losing a job for which he is totally unqualified.

Fortunately, my many years of experience has afforded me the insight into differentiating between the honest and sincere, and those who are in “it” merely for the paycheck and the glory and power of calling themselves “leaders” . There are tons of “charlatans” in a leadership roll, mostly because the voting public is ill-informed or apathetic. I have always viewed my job as being that of one the people whose goal it is to strip away the cover of those who lead for their own selfish needs. Unfortunately, there are many who still believe they are immune from public scrutiny and are above and beyond being called to task for their greed and power-hungry “leadership”! This area has plenty of those types.

With a background which includes local weekly and daily newspapers, both as a reporter and editor, and in the highly competitive world of big city magazines, as an editor and managing editor, I gained a lot of insight into the world of politics. When newsletters first became popular, I am proud to say that I was in the forefront of editing and publishing this “new” way of communicating. I have worked with some of the finest people this country has known, including Bobby Kennedy, Millicent Fenwick and many other, including Sen. Warren Magnuson and Rep. Ted Kupferman, who went on to become a Federal District Court Judge. I have also worked with, and against, many who were in politics strictly for the power, glory and financial gain. Thankfully, I was able to help bring many of these people down and force them out of leadership roles.

Along the way I have encountered literally thousands of people who have thanked me for my efforts and for helping them to enjoy a better way of life. I would like to think that I have accomplished the same thing in this area.

There are hundreds of people who I encounter on a regular basis, most of whom I have never met and who know me from this publication, my appearances at city council meetings and at local taxpayers' association meetings. If you are one of those who think nobody watches these TV broadcasts, you are sadly mistaken. I meet people from all over this area, most of whom enjoy the telecasts of these meetings and who share my beliefs. I also meet many who disagree with me, and that is their prerogative. They have their opinions, and I have mine, and that what makes this such a wonderful country in which to live. Freedom to think and believe, and in many cases to say what you want, as long as it is not done with malice and the intent to slander or malign, is guaranteed by our constitution, although there are many who try to amend this precious document to fill their own agendas.

There are many who pass themselves off as journalists, mostly because they believe they are, though they lack any credentials. There are also many who, for whatever reasons, have their own agenda and are more intent on blowing their own horn rather than serving the interests of the public. There are also a great many who “think” they have the answers and, instead of sharing that information, would rather pat themselves on the back for what they believe they are accomplishing. Any astute politician knows that and will pander to those individuals to gain their favor. Thankfully, I would like to think that I have progressed beyond the token adulation and “back slapping” that comes with the territory. That comes from experience. The name “journalist” does not mean that one is proficient in his field. It is merely a “moniker” which many relish as their individual badge of honor. Sad, but true!

As for what I get out of doing my job? Very little, to say the least. There is no paycheck, no fringe benefits, and certainly no “insider information” or hidden agenda gleaned from those with whom I have daily encounters. Some respect me, some despise me, and many are too stupid to know when they are being watched and monitored and in danger of being exposed. These are the “leaders”, or wannabe leaders, who are the subject of our scrutiny. There are some pretty fine people in this area, many of whom have the best interests of the public at heart. Most of them are maligned or subject to some form of control over their activities. There are others who seek the favor of the “in crowd” and play the game for the power trip they get out of it all. One sense of personal pride is our sense of memory!

We can honestly say that we have never benefited from our association with any politician, or business leader, nor have we ever been “offered” any position which could be misconstrued as a position of power. Had we wanted any of these things, we would have run for office ourselves, and probably could have made a strong showing, even if we didn't win. However, that has never been our goal and it hasn't changed to this date. In all sincerity, we have attempted, somewhat successfully, to separate the good from the bad, and our string of successes has not been broken. We intend to pursue that goal as long as we are physically and mentally able to do so. NO ONE is immune, and NO ONE should sit on their laurels in the belief that they have an “inside track” with us. We have built a readership through our honest and sincere appraisal of the real facts behind the scenes in this area, and we will continue to do so. One of the first lessons we learned in journalism, not in journalism courses, is that the first time you are on the “take” is the beginning of the end of your career. No paycheck, no “perks”, no “freebies” is our motto. If you want our respect, you'll earn it. That's the way we are, and that's why we do what we do! HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY! JT

2010-06-26T11:11:00.001-07:00

TO AUTHOR BOOK ON KOREA

A book on the Korean War, and a history of the war and South Korea's emergence as a major force in the world is in the offing by this writer. Through the encouragement of many friends, including Airman Bob Maciejeski, former associate editor of Scranton-at-Large and now a member of the USAF, we have decided to start work on the new venture.

With the cooperation of The Embassy of the Republic of Korea, and Moon Kim, of the Office of Defense Attache, and many others, we have begun working on the project and hope to have a finished product before the start of the new year.

Our experiences as a member of the U.S. Army during the Korean War of 1950, and our desire to present a look at the ravages of war and what a country can do to revitalize itself, will be the primary theme of the book. The harshness and realities of war and what has transpired since the South Korean nation's sad past to its resurgence into the modern world is a story worth being told, and we fully appreciate the cooperation from the Asian nation's offices.

Though we have not been able to revisit South Korea since 1950, we have sought to educate ourselves on the progress made by that war-torn nation, and its present day status as a top 20 economic power in the world. The book will offer a look at the people of that nation, then and now, and will offer an insight into those forces, American and foreign, which allied themselves to fight against a communist takeover of the Korean Peninsula.

We will be seeking input from Korean War veterans; Korean-American immigrants; and other sources who can lend stories and photos to our project. We encourage anyone who can contribute to this venture to please contact us via snail mail, e-mail, or by phone. Credit will be given to all contributors.

We also ask that families and friends of those who made the ultimate sacrifice also afford us their input.
This writer feels there is a need for the story to be told, including the sadness and the sometime humor of war, from the perspective of those of us who were actual participants. Any and all assistance will be greatly appreciated, and we thank the people and the Embassy of the Republic of Korea for their help!

In the interim, JT'sOPINION will continue to be published, on a reduced schedule, in order to keep our readers abreast of the goings on in our present world. Thanks for your cooperation and consideration!
JT

2010-06-26T11:09:00.000-07:00

2010-06-14T16:54:00.000-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

S.H.A. “BUYS OFF” BAKER

Facing a lawsuit filed against them by disgraced Housing Authority Director David Baker, the Scranton Housing Authority opted to offer Baker a “buyout” as a settlement for the lawsuit. As part of the agreement, which had already been signed by Baker, prior to the Board meeting Monday night, the Board agreed to pay Baker $5,333.33 per month for a period of 30 months, and to pay health insurance for Baker and his wife until they reach the age of 65. In addition, Baker resigned from his position as Director and agreed to not seek to return to the S.H.A.

Despite the fact that Baker is under a Federal indictment, on 16 counts, and is facing trial on Monday, June 21st, the Board opted to settle the civil lawsuit, which had been filed in February. Baker's scheduled criminal trial has been stalled by various motions for more than two years, but has been set, as of this writing, for next Monday.

Despite repeated queries as to why the Board opted to settle his civil lawsuit without waiting until next month's scheduled meeting, the Board, and Attorney Paterson, danced around the issue, claiming it was in the “best interests of the Housing Authority” to settle the issue.

This writer questioned why the Board would not hold off until Baker's trial, one week away, before settling the suit and was rebuffed with answers which seemed evasive. The final vote was unanimous and was accomplished before the citizen participation was allowed, precluding any opposition from the limited audience. It is believed if Baker was found guilty, it would make the civil suit moot!

Having covered this case from the beginning, it would appear that a deal was struck with Baker, and he is expected to plea bargain at his scheduled trial. The general consensus of opinion, gleaned from public input and that of Housing Authority employees who had given depositions against Baker, is that a “deal” was worked out in an effort to “buy” Baker's silence with regard to the Federal Govt. Investigation of the S.H.A. which is on-going. A Dauphin County Grand Jury believed evidence presented to them was sufficient to pursue the 16-count criminal indictment against him. His scheduled trial has been postponed for more than 2 years, due primarily to “motions” filed by his attorneys.

Baker had been offered a plea bargain shortly after the indictment, but according to sources, he refused and insisted on going to trial. During this period he has been paid his regular salary, and benefits, for what the Board claimed was time off which he never used and accumulated sick time. His “benefits” ran out this year, and he subsequently filed the civil suit claiming he was not afforded his rights to a fair hearing. Since that time, he has been collecting unemployment according to the Board Solicitor. The Board acted to name Acting Director Gary Pelucacci to replace Baker as Director, and the move was approved unanimously. JT

2010-06-13T07:04:00.000-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

60 YEARS AGO, BUT THE MEMORIES LINGER ON!

It isn't very often that I make an attempt to recall things which I would much rather forget, but I hope you will bear with me. It has been 60 years since a “gung ho” young kid (18), gave up a plush assignment at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, N.Y., to seek the glamor and excitement of an overseas deployment in the U.S. Army. Most people thought I was crazy, since an assignment to West Point was an assignment into the lap of luxury for any G.I., and as I look back, I guess I wasn't the sharpest young kid who ever donned the uniform of the U.S. Army. Nevertheless, it happened.

As I look back, it was one of the most exciting and unusual mistakes I ever made. Sailing from Pittsburg, California aboard an old WWII troop ship, I vividly recall the band playing the strains of “Those far away places, with strange sounding names”, and a tear still comes into my eyes as I embarked on a cruise across the Pacific Ocean which held all the hopes of visiting exotic places that I had learned about in geography class.

The peaceful “cruise” offered glimpses of whales, dolphins, “flying” fish and the tranquility of spreading out on deck to watch the stars at night, as we blissfully sailed across the ocean. On the day of our arrival in Yokohama Bay, we were awakened early, and assembled on deck to see one of the most beautiful sights in the world, the sun rising over Mt. Fujiyama in all it majesty. The Land of the Rising Sun truly lives up to its name!

From there on out, the dream turned into a nightmare. In mid-June of 1950, my unit was dispatched to Sasebo, Japan, site of an old Japanese submarine base where you could get drunk on beer, and seasick as the floor of the bar swayed with the roll of the tide. What an experience for a young, hotshot kid from New Jersey. It was to be the last “youthful” experience as we boarded an old ferry boat for a late night “cruise” from Southern Japan to South Korea's Pusan City. The realities would soon set in!

We were put aboard the only “square wheeled train” in existence and sent north, complete with all combat gear, including an M-1 rifle. Unfortunately, we were not given any ammunition on the train and felt helpless as we began to be bombarded by machine gun fire less than 1/2 hour after our train had departed. Most of our train ride was spent lying on the floor as we “clack-clacked” north towards the unknown. We were then “trucked” further north before embarking into “hell”, just south of the 38th parallel. A bunch of “green” kids, in an undermanned and under trained 19th Infantry Regiment of the 24th Infantry Division of the U.S. Army, sent to face an unknown enemy which proved to be an over-powering force which literally kicked our asses and forced us to retreat hundreds of miles, suffering an extremely high loss of life, in a still not-understood war of futility.

“What the hell is going on here?” was the only thought which came into mind. We not only had no idea where we were at any given time, but we had less of an idea of what we were doing there. This was not the “glamorous, exciting” trip for which we had given up a plush job at the U.S.M.A. It wasn't long before we learned that everything we had learned wasn't nearly enough. Worse, we had never seen so much carnage and loss of friends as we were to experience, and we had never anticipated seeing poor people, many of whom had never even been across the street from their homes, wandering aimlessly down a “road to nowhere”. It was gut-wrenching to see women, older than my grandmother, laden with huge A-frames, carrying everything they could bear, while holding the hands of little kids, going “nowhere” in an attempt to escape the onslaught of the North Korean Army's overwhelming forces.

Naturally, my thoughts turned to comparing their lives with the life I had left behind me in New Jersey. I thought of what it would be like if it had been my family, uprooted and plodding aimlessly along an old road, having no idea where they were going or what lie ahead. I wept often at those sights, but especially when they were gunned down, needlessly, by an unseen enemy and lay alongside the roads, ignored by the miles upon miles of others who sought refuge from this idiocy.

I guess the reality of war didn't really hit me until I saw the first truckload of dead bodies which had been brought in from the field. The pain of watching bodies, stacked up like potato sacks, being unceremoniously dumped on the ground as graves registration teams sought to identify them and strip them of any jewelry and I.D. to send back to the grieving families at home. (Two years later, I got a package from the Army which contained my Ewell Blackwell baseball glove).The tears welled-up as I spotted one kid, a young blonde-haired kid from someplace in Pennsylvania, with whom I had taken basic training. Then there were others, kids from places like Nanticoke, Freeland, Mahanoy City, and other places I had never heard of. Kids I had partied with, and had suffered through the indignities of transforming from high school kids to “trained” Army “combat-ready” soldiers. This couldn't, and shouldn't be happening, but it was.

There was Frank Dietrich (Reading, Pa.) and Steve Feltenstein (Newark, NJ) and a host of others with whom I had been friends. Emory Easterwood and Tracey T., Giddens (both from Georgia), and Lt. Tommy Trexler (Pennsylvania). All friends, and all of us soon to be reunited in Army hospitals in Tokyo, Texas, and later Valley Forge Army Hospital in Phoenixville, Pa. from where we eventually would be discharged, complete with Combat Infantry Badges and Purple Heart medals.

I still remember landing in Philadelphia, aboard a Hospital plane, during a severe winter storm, and seeing the faces of Salvation Army personnel welcoming us home, at 11:30 at night, in freezing cold, with smiles on their faces. After what we had been through, these were truly the faces of Angels and would never be forgotten. Yet, the memories of all the fallen brothers still is fresh in my mind.

There were no parades, no “welcome home” signs, no “thanks for a job well done”. Just memories, some good, and many more bad. Many years later, after much research and looking, I found that most of the “old gang” had gone to a better place. Still, they remain in that little corner of my mind, never to be forgotten. The glamor and glory? It never really happened! It was pure hell and should never be allowed to happen again. There are thousands of other bad memories which still remain locked in, too!

However, as long as there are politicians, and greedy and corrupt leaders, and those who would “rule” the world, there will be wars. And there will continue to be casualties, on both sides. Many American lives, as well as those of Brits, Aussies, and other allies were lost, as were the lives of many Korean soldiers, from both the South and North, and those of other “enemy” countries. They, and we, were all children of someone. And despite differences of philosophy and purpose, they should be remembered. Unfortunately, the world leaders never seem to learn their lesson. There is no real purpose for any war! We salute our fallen comrades, and our fighting forces who still go on! Will it ever end? JT

2010-06-07T20:54:00.000-07:00

COUNCILMAN SUES CITY FOR PENSION

City Councilman John “Jack” Loscombe has filed suit in Federal Court seeking reinstatement of his earned pension. The legal action, filed June 6th, seeks to reinstate the pension which was stripped from him when he accepted appointment to fill the unexpired term of former Councilman Bill Courtright.

Loscombe was a Scranton City Fire Captain when he was seriously injured while fighting a fire in early 1996. Responding to a call for possible victims trapped in a burning structure, the truck ladder bucket in which he was fighting the fire, struck a 12,000 volt power line, seriously injuring Loscombe and the power surge was so strong it literally melted the tires on the fire apparatus. The building, at South Main St. and Luzerne St. housed Betz' Bar and apartments above it.

Though Loscombe returned to duty, he was forced to retire in late 1997 as a result of severe nerve damage sustained as a result of his injuries. He was, in reality, forced into retirement against his wishes and was awarded his earned pension.

Upon Courtright's election to Tax Collector, Loscombe submitted his application to succeed him, and following interviews of all the candidates, he was awarded the appointment and was sworn in February 2010. His appointment successfully guaranteed Council a “super majority”, headed by Council President Janet Evans.

It was shortly thereafter that the City of Scranton stripped Loscombe of his pension, in what the suit alleges, was a “political move”, with the intent of placing him in a financially crippling situation, with the hopes of forcing him to resign his council spot. The suit also alleges that he was not afforded notice of the City's action, nor was he allowed the right to be heard.

Loscombe's suit, filed by Attorney Cynthia L. Pollick, Pittston, representing the Employment Law Firm, cites violations of Loscombe's First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights under the Constitution of the United States, and seeks reinstatement of his pension benefits; back pay of pension benefits; equitable and declaratory relief; pre and post interest; and attorney fees and costs. The suit demands a full jury trial.

According to the lawsuit, Loscombe was penalized for exercising his right to serve in a political office , and the intent to strip him of his earned pension was designed as retaliation for his acceptance of the appointed position on City Council. It further cites precedent in a decision handed down by the courts (Deshaney v Winnebago County Dept. of Soc. Svcs. 489 U.S. 189, 196, 103 L.Ed. 2D 249, 109 S.Ct. 998 (1989). The “due process” clause “was intended to prevent government from abusing its power or employing it as an instrument of oppression.”

“Our Take”: We have said from the beginning that Loscombe has been victimized, and before the “nay sayers” start, we reiterate, Jack Loscombe's pensions was “earned” during his 20 years of service with the Scranton Fire Dept. The actions of the City and its Pension Board were not only disgusting and degrading, but are indicative of the amateurish trash which passes for “political payback” in this City. The folks involved in this travesty should be tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail. It is the same “joke” which hurts others, including Janet Evans, who has earned her “disability pension” during her tenure as a teacher, and a public servant. Unfortunately for Scranton, the low-lifes who run the political machinery in this town are the real problem here. We continue to pray that the Feds will come down on this clique and will kick their a---- from here to Timbuktu. This City needs a clean-up drastically, and we can only hope the Federal Government really starts to protect the citizens from further “oppression”. If the City really wants to do the right thing, they will immediately offer Jack Loscombe his pension, with back pay, and save the City of Scranton from further disgrace and ridicule. We doubt if these people have enough sense to save themselves any further embarrassment, and we don't believe they have any conscience or self-respect. If they do, they certainly hide it well!

BAKER'S DAY COMING IN TWO WEEKS

In another political embarrassment to this City, disgraced Scranton Housing Authority Director David Baker is expected to “cop a plea” to the 16 count Federal Indictment against him. After stalling the case for more then two years, he is finally slated to appear in Federal Court on June 21st, in Wilkes Barre. We can only hope that Baker will get his just due and that the investigations will continue into the alleged corruption of Scranton, Lackawanna County and the Commonwealth.

The hard-working people of this area have suffered enough under the cloud of doubt which permeates the atmosphere and we sincerely hope this case will not only serve as a major step in cleaning up our area, but will take down others who may be involved. For far too long, too many “alleged” civil servants have raped and pillaged this area, to suit their own egos and wants. The situation has prevailed for so long that most people have lost faith in honest government ever taking root in this area.

Everyone involved in this travesty of justice should be arrested, tried, and, if convicted, given the maximum term and subjected to the total disgrace and media disclosure which they deserve. This is the only solution for this City and its citizens and taxpayers. It is long past due to restore the dignity and self respect this area deserves. Let the chips fall where they may and let's get these disgracefully inadequate and self-centered hypocrites out of office and into oblivion where they belong.

Scranton and the surrounding area deserve much better than they have been getting, and it takes a wake-up call like this to finally get the citizens on the right track again. If this City wants to be saved from itself, it is going to take a major effort on the part of its taxpayers and youth to make it happen.
The financial doldrums in which we find ourselves have reached the breaking point, and only a concerted effort to wake-up and smell the roses is going to turn things around. We hope this is just the beginning and we ask the Feds, “When the hell are you going to step in and take control?”

Take these lawyers, politicians, and developers to task and strip them of their “unearned” cash cows. Let their families suffer the results of their hanky-panky and the indignities which they have fought so hard to bring on themselves. If the shoe fits, let these people wear it and let's stop the b.s.

JT

2010-06-01T23:24:00.000-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source

DOHERTY'S TRUE MAJOR LOSS!

Scranton Mayor Chris Doherty not only took a shellacking in his run for Sen. Bob Mellow's seat, but “His Eminence” suffered deeper wounds than most were aware of. Now, he is forced to re-assume his position as Mayor of the City and must face the mess he has created head on.

Doherty's problems have been mostly self-inflicted, but he had been hoping to win the Senatorial seat and quietly fade away from facing Scranton's big issues. Any hopes he had of his adversary, Council President Janet Evans, stepping into the Mayor's slot went out the window with his devastating loss in the primary election.

He had hoped his “escape” would have dumped the city's growing problems into the hands of Mrs. Evans, who probably would have moved into the Mayor's spot. Unfortunately for Doherty, his fortunes were shattered when he was soundly defeated and finished in third place, barely edging out the fourth place “winner”. Mrs. Evans remains President of Council, Scranton's official Legislative body!

Now, unable to “walk away” from his troubles, short of quitting and skipping town, he is placed in the position of being forced to account for his leadership inadequacies. With the loss of his “buddy” Austin Burke, he is left to face the music alone, with few, if any, capable of helping him cover his tracks.

Probably one of his major blunders has been his “dedication” to making Nay Aug Park (his playpen) the landmark of his tenure. The tree house, give away of the “zoo” to his “friends” at Lackawanna College, and lately, the fact that the pool is leaking some 50,000 gallons of water daily and in dire need of repair, have all happened on his watch. Add to that the fact that it is improbable any of the other city pools will be open as scheduled and you have better insight into the “Doherty Legacy”.

No money available for police and fire unions; no money available for paving city streets; an over-inflated budget awarding raises to his city hall appointees; and tons of money available for “legal fees” for services which should be handled by the City Attorney, and we can compound Scranton's woes, inflicted by the Doherty regime.

Most unfortunately for the Mayor, his hopes that the City mess would fall on Janet Evans has really backfired! With him remaining as Mayor, he must now turn all his efforts towards Mrs. Evans and call on his “advisers” to devise a way to dump this mess in her lap. And he is certainly seeking ways to do just that. Too bad for him that not everyone who is employed by the City is in his corner. New disclosures keep coming our way on a daily basis and he also is faced with the reality that Federal investigators most likely are taking a good look at his record of tax, borrow, spend and “give away” of the City resources. His “Library Authority” ploy also is destined to fall flat when all the facts are known. Does the name David Baker ring a bell here? He is the disgraced Housing Authority Director!

Let's not forget the “needed” extensive repairs to Parking Authority garages; the “timely” awarding of contracts to “family” at a time when they were facing financial disaster; and the awarding of “no bid” contracts to political contributors, and we have an emerging picture of the real Doherty administration.

There is little doubt that the Feds are also looking into the various autonomous authorities which rule Scranton with an iron fist, and the wholesale dumping of Scranton tax dollars into the coffers of “hit and run” businesses, many of whom have taken the money and literally run away. OECD funding to a wide variety of “businesses”, and crony developers, should come under major scrutiny, and those responsible should be vigorously prosecuted if indeed there has been “hanky-panky” involved.

Also, how long should it take to widen a sidewalk along one block of Mulberry St., as the “Golden Octopus” is alleged to be doing. We were told that there would be no obstruction to traffic on this main artery, yet at least half of one lane is blocked, traffic is impeded at a busy intersection, and heavy equipment is in place to “widen” a sidewalk, something any reasonable mason could have easily accomplished in a couple of weeks. Is the “sidewalk widening” really the goal of those involved or is it merely the first step in extending another tentacle of the “Golden Octopus”?

If this sham is evidence of what is transpiring in the Doherty-”Golden Octopus” alliance, what can we expect when another whole block of land, opposite the DeNaples Center, is “reconstructed” to suit the needs of the U. How will the traffic be affected then, when heavy construction equipment is in place and traffic is really impeded for months while the construction takes place. What provisions have been made to allow for the constant stream of medical units (ambulances) to traverse that area, with two hospitals nearby and the major route to all three medical facilities being utilized day and night?

Getting back to the pools, what excuse will Doherty have for the kids when the really hot weather sets in and there is no place for them to swim? Will he and his cronies invite these kids and their families to use their pools and backyards? Or is this also Janet Evans' fault?

As for calling Janet Evans a “Comp Queen” and belittling Councilman Jack Loscombe for serving as civil servants, enough already! Mrs. Evans has earned her paycheck for a number of years and has managed to attend Council meetings regularly, in spite of her pain and difficulties. During he tenure on City Council, she has missed less meetings, though having an excuse in this term, than her two previous fellow Councilwomen, Judy Gatelli and Sherru Fanucci, both of whom racked up impressive absences without excuses. Fellow Council member Bob McGoff's recent “tardiness” is directly attributable to cowtowing with the Mayor at a photo op when he should have been in attendance at Council. Mrs. Evans' pay has been reduced considerably and she certainly isn't “f'aking” her injury.

Jack Loscombe was seriously injured on duty as a Scranton firefighter, and was forced to accept retirement. When he accepted the position as a City Councilman, he was forced to give up his retirement pay to serve as an elected official. What most don't realize is that he took a substantial cut in his income, yet he has still chosen to serve the public. The naysayers, and “Lynette Liturgy” bloggers have no idea what they are talking about and only add to the perception that they are mostly immature and uninformed and pandering to Doherty's consistent quest for glory. They run off at the mouth, to an
ill-informed readership, yet are reluctant to use their own names, instead, hiding behind sophomoric pseudonyms to satisfy their egos, and protect their spineless diatribe. Get a life! At least we are not afraid to use our real name and address, and we aren't afraid of controversy. Can you say the same?

JT

2010-05-23T12:58:00.001-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source

BAKER GOING DOWN?

Contrary to what so many want to believe, it appears that disgraced Scranton Housing Director David Baker is at the end of his “career”. Facing a 16-count Federal Indictment on various charges, the suspended SHA Director is slated to appear in Federal Court (Wilkes Barre) on June 21st. It seems the culmination of the long-drawn out affair is in sight and from what we heard, Baker will plead guilty and may face jail time. In any event, should he “cop a plea”, he is apparently finished (even though this is Scranton) and we look for further fall-out from this fiasco.

It is hard to conceive that Baker acted alone, especially given his long-term relationship with so many cronies, and their seeming “fear” of his “dictatorship”. The raid of the SHA offices must have produced evidence which has not yet been presented, and the indictment of Baker, and subsequent finding of guilt, may be just a prelude of things to come in Scranton. The Board of Directors of the SHA, and “interim” Baker replacement, may be in for some serious questioning in the next few months. On the surface, most would like to believe it is over, but it is more likely that this is just the “tip of the iceberg” and there is still more to come.

Many employees of the SHA are known to have given depositions to the Dauphin County Grand Jury which returned the indictments. It is obvious that even Baker's high end lawyers couldn't keep postponing the inevitable, and it is harder to conceive that he acted along, without anyone else having knowledge of his “alleged misdeeds”. The Board should have been overseeing the Director's actions (isn't that their purpose) and others allied with him should have known , or suspected what was going on. We'll be watching this one closely.

It stands to reason that other Scranton Authorities (autonomous, to say the least) should be sweating things out as a domino effect may very well take place. Even the most naïve have got to suspect that other city agencies have been playing the same game. Scranton's financial troubles are definitely not caused by only one of these authorities. The continuing Federal probe may very well make Luzerne County's problems pale by comparison.

The “good old boy” network which has controlled the area's destiny for so long is facing serious scrutiny and from what we have gleaned, the “fat lady” hasn't even begun her warm up. When she does start to sing, look for a whole lot of people to head for the hills, in hopes of avoiding hearing a high “C” with their name on it. And don't expect the “middle men” to escape unscathed. Expect many top names to be among the “missing” as well as a host of lesser knowns who probably have some involvement.

We strongly suggest you don't blink or turn away! You may very well miss the next eruption of the Scranton Volcano. These things take time, but one thing the Feds have on their side is time, and lots of money and highly-trained and skilled investigators. Remember Al Capone and other Mafia “dons”?

IS THE 'NEW' COUNCIL FACING A BACKLASH?

From all appearances, it appears the “new” Scranton City Council has stumbled, and many former “believers” are unhappy with the way things are going.

Our mail indicates that many are unhappy that the Council, and Solicitor, have thrown Andy Sbaraglia and Giovanni Piccolino “under the bus”. Both were appointed to authorities, but when the time came for them to be seated, they were denied access to their appointed seats. Most believe that since they were appointed by Council, they should have been backed by that body. This was not the case, and it has left a sour taste in the mouths of many former supporters of the group.

Sbaraglia and Piccolino were “hung out to dry” when they were informed that it was up to them to challenge their right to be seated. Something is definitely not “kosher” and many have expressed their reluctance to accept any potential appointments, if they can't count on Council to back them up. This does not bode well for Council's future and should have been addressed right at the start.

Others seem upset because Council has been slow to present “city business” and has been slow to react to the Mayor's continued intransigence. As one reader put it; “They are the legislative body but they act like they are afraid 'legislate' or don't understand the concept of governing!”

We are not taking sides, but we have begun to have our own doubts about the direction this Council is taking. It would appear that we have been cut off as well. Waiting until next year is not an alternative. We've seen that happen too many times with the N.Y. Mets, the Phillies and others in which we had placed our faith. “Same old crap with different faces”, another reader says. “Isn't there anybody in Scranton who will stand up for the taxpayers? Lip service is not why we elected these people.” claims another. “There's a foul smell of politics which remains in the air. Stagnation?” he concludes.

We're not ready to pull the plug on our support, but we do hope to see some action, instead of words.

Bob McGoff was late for the last meeting due to a “previous” commitment. Did you know he accompanied the Mayor to a “dedication” ceremony for which he was nothing more than an observer?
It seems the Mayor is grooming McGoff for future stardom, Why weren't other members of Council invited to attend, and, as a matter of fact, why aren't they ever asked to attend these “photo ops” for the Mayor. Scranton is not a fiefdom for one man and it seems funny these affairs are always timed to coincide with scheduled meeting times for City Council. His “swearing in”. If Doherty had any guts at all, or any common sense, he would recognize the fact that he could change the time or venue to another day or time and it would be beneficial for Council to be in attendance as well. As far as we know, there are no plans to change the city's name to “Dohertyville”, at least not as of this writing.

By the way, McGoff may want to explain why he is so knowledgeable about what the “Golden Octopus” is doing to the City, especially along Mulberry Street. Isn't that information which should be shared with “all” the Council, not just Doherty clones? We though we got rid of Gatelli and Fanucci, but it seems we have another Pinocchio for Gepeto Doherty's side show! Is Judy waiting in the wings for another run at Council in next year's election? Or is Dougie being groomed for another try? Shades of days gone by. What's next on Chris's agenda? Moving City Hall to Nay Aug Park's Tree House?

JT

2010-05-20T22:26:00.000-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source

HOT AIR BALLOON BURSTS!

Hundreds of Scranton voters were devastated when the Doherty “Hot Air Balloon” exploded in Tuesday's primary election. The Doherty Bubble, idolized by scores of Scranton voters was the second consecutive failure by Chris Doherty to reach the moon, preceded by numerous failed attempts to soar to new heights. Doherty forces were shocked and were expected to retreat to the Nay Aug Tree House to seek answers to the continued failures.

Despite the efforts of the “Doherty Doomers” (Chris's new gang, not to be confused with the Legion of Doom), the Mayor's quest for “immortality” failed miserably as he finished third in his bid to assume the throne of retiring State Senator Bob Mellow.

One of the unanswered questions is significant....where were the 6,000 job holders who alleged were in the Doherty camp? Were they ungrateful to their benefactor or were the Doherty “handlers” misguided in their belief that the “Grand Master” could garner enough votes to beat those who thought he was invincible.

It is possible that these “missing 6,000 job holders” were preparing to help Austin Burke move to his new “digs” in Harrisburg, or perhaps they were not aware of the fact that their “fearless leader” might sue them in Lackawanna County Court for their failure to support him in his quest for more power. Or is it that his “dedicated followers” just couldn't bear to see Scranton fall into oblivion if he were to move up to a new power base? Numerous lawyers, developers and cronies were possibly heading for the hills to escape the “uncalled for” potential Federal investigation into Scranton's probable pending challenge as a real life alternative to The Office.

Even the combined forces of DPW and appointees to city authorities couldn't bail Doherty out on this one. It would appear that police and fire union members may have been strong enough to counter the Judy Gatelli-Sherry Fanucci-Bob McGoff combine of supporters. McGoff, believed to be the next Mayor if Doherty had succeeded, would appear to be a big loser as well.

Doherty has apparently been grooming McGoff as the next “anointed” Mayor, even tabbing him as the “future” true leader of Scranton. The lone “holdover” councilman of the Doherty Council has been seen “heeling” at his master's feet in recent weeks, showing up late for meetings as he accompanied his boss on “photo ops”. Poor Bobby...now he must face preparations for next year's reelection campaign sans Doherty's popularity-based “City Rescue Squad”. Hang on, Bob, Austin will probably step in to lead you down the path towards the Rose Garden. And, you always have the “popularity” of Judy and Sherry as potential power bases. Their “track record” might help to groom you for the net round in 2011. And there's always the City Hall faction to kick in campaign funds. Life is a real b.... at times!

ON THE OTHER FRONTS

We were off on two fronts but pretty well had the remainder of the races in tow. Our big loser was Arlen Specter. We fully expected him to pull out a win but feel he missed the boat by not countering the Sestak commercial which was cut to indicate his party switch. Had he countered the ad he might have brought a lot of voters back into his corner. Brilliant move by Sestak...dumb move by the Specter group. Our experiences over the years were good. No matter what, when we contacted Specter for info, assistance, or help, his office was gracious and answered our queries expeditiously. We're sorry to see him go, but we wish him well. He had a good run, but maybe his time to retire has come!

We anticipated a Kanjorski win. Corey O'Brien let his ego get in his way and should have spent a little more time in public office before taking on a major candidate with more experience than Corey has in age. Too much, too soon. A full term as County Commissioner was the right way for Corey to go, but he jumped in without testing the waters and got stung by the temperature. Not necessarily the end of the trail, but maybe O'Brien will learn a lesson that so many others haven't. You need to “earn” your spurs before you try winning a horse race.

Lou Barletta is an astute and seasoned politician and may have beaten Kanjorski last time around if he had more exposure in Lackawanna County. This is his Achilles Heel and his handlers have yet to learn that. He needs more exposure than a “pizza parlor tryst” with a handful of backers. This is not a high school popularity race and Kanjorski has a war chest and a wealth of experience. He can be beat, and Barletta has all the tools to do it, but his handlers have got to learn they cannot shield Lou from controversy. That's part of a political campaign. The man is a “player” and needs to given free reign. He needs a chance at bat if he is expected to hit a home run. Get smart guys, and give the man a chance! If anyone can beat Kanjo it is Lou. Don't try to protect him from your fears. He can handle it!

On the “succeed Mellow” campaign, we had expected Doherty to fail. He was in way over his head and still believes people don't see through him. Volpe probably ruined his own chances with a campaign which was “overkill”. Most of the people we talked too were turned off by the incessant phone calls. Too much. Corcoran had his baggage and could have eked out a win but his absence from the political wars was a factor. People forget quickly if you aren't in the mainstream. Wansacz stumbled, probably due to his continued support for Rendell whose star has been rapidly falling. Taxpayers are more aware than politicians give them credit for, and the proof is in the outcome of this race in particular. Chris Phillips never was a threat, having been absent from the campaign front and devoid of substance. We look for Republican Frank Scavo to make the November race a barn-burner and wouldn't be surprised to see him pull off an “upset”. He should be perceived as a real, and serious, threat!

We figured Kevin Murphy was a lock in his race. He has made his presence known and people generally like what they see. His actions speak louder than the words of his predecessor or challengers. We look for him to be around for a while and maybe even move up the ranks before too long.

We're still trying to figure out how Ken Smith managed to save his own hide. Kevin Haggerty shot himself in the foot and Keeler and Lesh were disappointing, probably due to guilt by association. Lee Miller, er Doug Morgan, or whatever his name is, finally managed to win a race, even though he (they?) was unopposed. Come November, he'll have to justify his “in my opinion” take on things and probably answer for his “record” as a landlord and other less than admirable traits which he can't sweep under the rug, even with his “seasoned” campaign manager! Can't wait for this one!
JT

2010-05-14T04:17:00.001-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source

VOTERS NEED TO BE ALERT

Voters need to be alert! This Tuesday is Primary Election Day! Are You Informed?

A gentleman was killed in an auto crash and ascended to Heaven where he was met by St. Peter. The goodly Saint assured the man he would have a chance to choose Heaven or Hell!

The gentleman was told he would spend 1 day in Hell and then 1 day in Heaven. As he descended into Hell, he was “concerned”, but when the elevator doors opened he was shocked to see the Devil smiling and leading the crowd in cheers and song. Steak and lobster tail was abundant and the residents seemed to be having a wonderful time, partying and thoroughly enjoying themselves.

The next day, he ascended into Heaven and was afforded his 1 day there. He was greatly impressed with the beauty and tranquility, but the peace and quiet were a bit much.

St. Peter asked him to make a decision, and the gentleman suggested that while he liked Heaven, he might rather be in Hell since there was so much more happening.

As he returned to Hell, he was shocked when the elevator door opened and everything had changed. The Devil was no longer friendly, food was poor and scarce, and everyone seemed to be miserable. Hot, humid, smelly and uncomfortable atmosphere was the norm.

He approached the Devil and asked why the change. The Devil informed him that he had been there yesterday. “When you were here yesterday, we were campaigning.!”

“But why the change?” he asked again, to which the Devil replied. “I told you, yesterday we were campaigning.

“TODAY YOU VOTED!” …..ARE YOU SURE YOU'RE INFORMED?
JT

2010-05-11T01:06:00.001-07:00

TIGER'S “BULGE” PROBLEMS

Pro golf's Tiger Woods may very well be responsible for a much-needed change in the attitudes of professional athletes, and entertainers. For many years, these professionals have been plagued by varied and sundry problems, mostly too many “bulges”, which have cost them millions, and destroyed the careers of so many. For some reason, probably attributable to the fact that many young people enter the “professional” market completely unprepared to handle the tremendous pressures of celebrity!

For over 40 years I have seen numerous young stars , most of whom came from relative obscurity or have been the product of low-income backgrounds. They have been misguidedly led down a path to
disaster by greedy managers, promoters and, in some cases, by well-meaning family members who have fallen into the “sudden wealth” trap.
'
I particularly recall a super-star football player who was signed to a major contract as a professional. He was overwhelmed by the sudden fame and notoriety and actually believed that a bevy of camp followers, or “groupies”, really wanted to be “with” him because he possessed good looks, class, and a pocket full of money which he was willing to spread around. I watched as the “notes” from these young “ladies” poured into the locker room, some of which would make a drunken sailor visibly blush. Unfortunately, he was impressed and really believed he was “special” and highly desirable because of his looks and fame. Many of his peers tried to enlighten him that these “tramps” permeated every professional venue and he was just another potential “mark” for them. He actually believed that they “loved him” and had his best interests at heart.

To a kid from the “ghetto” of a large Eastern city, this was a dream come true. His agent and manager didn't try too hard to protect him from the onslaught and in less than 2 years, he had seen his rising professional career take a sudden downturn and his personal life become the target of public scorn. The “cuties” who “loved” him were merely using him to further their own expectations of achieving fame and notoriety at his expense. Sadly, he didn't listen, and sadder yet, his “protectors” let him fall into the trap. He acquired several lawsuits filed by these “rejected lovers”, most of whom had only been “one-night stands”, and many of whom would have had trouble meeting a guy in a bar at 2 a.m. One of them claimed she became pregnant by him and he had reneged on a promise to marry her. Others followed suit and in a very short time, he found himself on the brink of being broke. His agents, managers and lawyers, all of whom had already collected their percentages, let this poor soul fall from his pedestal, and worse yet, they abandoned him when the financial well dried up. They went on to other “clients” while he fell from grace and was relegated to playing semi-pro ball and then total obscurity.

The “ladies”, who became known as “predators” by other pros, moved on to other towns and those who hadn't collected any cash, bounced around from player to player, hoping to catch the “brass ring”. In the meantime, another talented young man went down in flames, falling from view and into the same “dumps” from which he had worked so hard to escape.

This scenario still plays out around college campuses and professional environs, and the same tired old trap snares another unsuspecting victim. The “star” fades and the “perpetrator” gains a touch of fame and makes a few bucks from predatory “news media” types.

Tiger Woods had the world by the tail. He was a good looking young kid, possessing a wealth of talent,
and living the good life with a beautiful wife, two young kids and fame and prestige which most men would give their right arm to acquire. Was he satisfied? Obviously not! He fell into a trap he laid for himself...an over-inflated ego, stoked by a bunch of people who should have been acting as buffers instead of pandering to him, and a host of “sports writers” who deified him. Not only did he fall from grace, but he “jumped” from the pinnacle of success. Despite the fact this tragic scenario cost him millions of dollars, it has placed a serious dent in his career and may very well have signaled the final chapter in what could have been the “best golfer” ever status he was hoping to achieve. It also probably has cost him his family.

Probably the worse part of this whole mess is that it is not limited to professional athletes or just to entertainers, but also has been the reason so many political figures have beaten themselves into the obscurity they had sought to escape. The newspapers are filled with stories of others, from all walks of society, who have not been able to differentiate between their libidos and their brains.

Yes, they are directly responsible for their own fate, but so are the “leeches” who take a percentage of their “employer's” earnings and the media which glorifies these people then proceeds to “jump on the bandwagon” when they fall. Take note of the fact that the “others” involved in these affairs get book deals, free publicity, and notoriety for being “innocent” victims of these professionals. Innocent? Let's call them what they really are...”predators” who prey on the rich and famous, then plead they are “victims”. Tragically, there are always “lawyers” waiting in the wings to grab their share of the “loot”!

It is too bad that the art of “parental guidance” has fallen along the wayside, and in many cases, it might be too little too late. Parents may try, and many do, but when the glitz and glitter of big money and fame enter the picture, all bets are off. Enter the “vultures” who prey on the financial rewards of working with, or for, these professionals, and we have a simple recipe for disaster.

Hopefully, rising young stars will learn from Tiger's woes, but we seriously doubt it. There will always be those out there who worship the almighty buck, and we know plenty of them, who would willingly through their “clients” under the bus. And let's not forget the “journalists” who help build the reputation of these pros, then jump all over the “stories” which emanate from the eventual fall from grace. After all, a story is a story. Right? Especially if you have been instrumental in engineering the rise then are so quick to “flaunt” the fall.

We have empathy for Tiger, to the degree that we did admire his talents and the image he had built up, however, we can not say we have sympathy for him. He knew what he was doing, or should have, and he paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to those around him who should have been protecting him It has been a trap which has been around for a long time, and will probably be around a lot longer. We can only hope that others will learn from Tiger's story, and will surround themselves with people who seriously have their interests at heart. It's a long hard climb to the top, but a rapid fall. Maybe the recent “bulge” will preserve his image, but we think he has seen the end of his career. Unfortunately, others will be right there to fill the void he leaves. Let's hope not!
JT

2010-05-07T11:40:00.000-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source

WHO SPIKED THE “HOLY WATER”?

There are times when a “slow” news day prevails! This is not one of them! Surely the “Gods of Journalism” have looked down on us and blessed us with a plethora of “newsworthy” events.

Firstly, the “Golden Octopus”, heretofore known as the University of Scranton, has reared its ugly head again. This time, with another “windfall” for the citizens of Scranton. Rev. Scott R. Pilarz, otherwise known as the Austin Burke of the Jesuits, has announced the “confiscation” (er acquisition) of another prime piece of real estate along the Mulberry St. corridor. Remember Mulberry St.? It used to be a part of Scranton, and a main thoroughfare, soon to become another part of the “church-state” coalition of “plunderers” which now controls the City of Scranton.

Pilarz, and others, propose a 14,000 square foot “fitness center”, embracing a 5-story, 189,000 square-foot residence hall for 400 students, and, of course, dining facilities. (will that include more “Jesuit Holy Water” facilities, otherwise known as bars?

It isn't bad enough that they have dug a huge hole along Mulberry St. to accommodate a “wider sidewalk”, now they are planning to make Mulberry St. a virtually impassable thoroughfare, replete with jaywalkers and late-night revelers. Anyone who traverses that area knows that unless you have high beams, and excellent brakes, you can consider yourself blessed if you don't run over those “bright students” who dart across the street, usually wearing dark clothing, and pretty well “juiced up”. It would be a prime location for “road kill” if it wasn't illegal to run over most of these brilliant (?) minds. Of course they are monitored by that “highly trained” U of S security force which specializes in standing on street corners chatting with the female population at that “prestigious” school. If they ever need to “act” on a situation, they can always call on Scranton's P.D. You must remember, the U does pay a tremendous amount to the city, in lieu of taxes. Of course that information is per “His Eminence” Chris Doherty.

We are not against education, and actually feel it is a good thing, but enough is enough. It is time to rein in the U and keep it in check. Scranton can ill afford to relinquish anymore prime real estate to any non-profits. Obviously, Doherty has taken a page from the book of former Bethlehem Mayor Don Cunningham, his good buddy, who succeeded in selling off much of that city to Lehigh University. The logical next step is the building of the “Jesuit Casino” to help offset the “costs” of doing business here!

ON THE POLITICAL FRONT

With just a little over a week to go before the primary election, we are itching to endorse candidates, but we said we wouldn't, so we won't. However, we will mention that there are certain candidates who we couldn't support even if they were the only ones on the ballot. Naturally, Chris Doherty heads that list, since we still believe he is totally incompetent; a phony from the word go; and “in the pocket” of far too many lawyers, developers, “wannabes” and others campaign contributors who have prolonged his political career far too long.

We can also eliminate a few others, which leaves us with Frank Scavo, Chris Phillips, Jim Wansacz and Chuck Volpe. We will set Scavo aside for now since he is the sole Republican candidate for Sen. Bob Mellow's job. If we really were going to endorse a candidate, it would be from those three candidates. The others are “repeat offenders” and don't warrant our vote.

Of course to our west we can't forget that Wilkes Barre Mayor Tom Leighton (he and Doherty might very well be cloned brothers) and John Yudichak. If we could, we would probably vote for Yudichak's adorable little daughter (the one who asks “why” in his commercials). She is a far more viable candidate for the 14th Senate District seat.

In equating Doherty and Leighton with “cloned” status, their challengers might want to ask why they both rejected a proposed $100,000 scholarship plan for outstanding high school seniors, 5 years ago.
That proposal only required their endorsement, and would have represented 100, $1,000 scholarships, to be paid for by private industry. Neither Mayor even acknowledged receiving the proposal, and both were known to have “trashed” the proposal without even giving it a second look. This is a fact, and was substantiated at the time by “aides” to both Mayors. Rep. Paul Kanjorski also “ignored” the proposal. His office alleged that “the Congressman already gives a scholarship”, whatever that means. This from three “alleged” upstanding citizens who have “concern” for their constituents. Okay!

On the race for State Representative, we can only totally eliminate Lee Morgan and Ken Smith from consideration. Morgan is known for not paying his bills (he still owes us $50 for ads he ran during his unsuccessful city council run). And, his flip-flop candidacies are a matter of record. He doesn't know which camp he is in and hasn't got a clue to the fact that the public holds him up to ridicule for his constant “blatherings” during election campaigns. Smith, the “invisible” man is obviously incapable of handling his own financial affairs (tax liens) etc. and certainly shouldn't be handling tax dollars. He stopped paying his taxes when he got elected the first time around, now claims everybody else but him is responsible.

Ah, yes. Local politics at it's finest! And, please, let's not overlook the annual “Case of the Missing Campaign Posters”. That paragon of virtue, DPW Director Jeff Brazil moved to have his “workers (?)” remove political signs which “infringed” on public rights of way. Paradoxically, there are a wealth of signs which have disappeared over the last few elections, none of which happened to belong to Chris Doherty. Probably that is due to the fact that DPW workers owe a great deal of allegiance to Doherty who has granted their every wish. Funny, but none of those “missing signs” have ever turned up behind a fire headquarters or police station. Now Brazil intends to seek legal action against a candidate for
“trespassing” on DPW property. Maybe he should rethink his intentions. He might find himself in a legal bind if someone can prove DPW has trouble finding road repair equipment on their own property.

THE ONGOING S.H.A. DIRECTOR SAGA

Again, suspended Scranton Housing Director David Baker is scheduled for trial. This time, the date is June 21st, in the Federal Courthouse in Wilkes Barre. Jury selection is slated for that date.

There are still those who are willing to bet that Baker beats the 16-count indictment against him, and many other who are praying that he does. Baker was ousted after the Feds raided his office, confiscated files and “mirror images” of computer hard discs and accumulated a wealth of “depositions” before presenting their case to a Grand Jury which returned the 16-count indictments on a variety of felony charges. This process has been ongoing, and postponed numerous times, over the two year period since the Grand Jury action.

Needless to say, there is considerable conjecture that many Baker associates had to have knowledge of his “allegedly illegal” activities, though no one else has yet been charged. It is hard to conceive that anyone could have worked with this guy without having some knowledge of what he was doing. If Baker truly is guilty of the allegations, it would stand to reason that other heads will fall too. Our understanding is that the investigation is still ongoing, and the end is not yet in sight. We fully expect Baker's legal “staff” will move for yet another postponement, as the legal system continues to be “milked”. After all, the accused has the presumption of innocence until he is found guilty! The others can merely continue to sweat while they await the outcome of the trial of their “leader”!

BEST WISHES TO ALL THE MOTHERS OUT THERE!!!

Sunday is Mother's Day, and we extend our best wishes to all the Mother's out there. It is the one day of the year when Mom should look forward to their off-spring “officially recognizing” them and their efforts. We lost our Mother 37 years ago, and still wish we could have the benefit of her love, care and words of encouragement.

For 365 days a year, 24 hours a day, they give us all they have to offer. It is only right, and just, that we acknowledge these blessed gifts from these special people. Regardless of how much they give, there just isn't enough we can do to thank them for what they have done for us.

Not everyone has been blessed with a loving, caring Mother, but we should all pay tribute to Motherhood. Orphans, those who have never had Motherly contact, and those of us who no longer have that cherished human to turn to in our hour of need, still owe a debt of gratitude to that person who carried us, nurtured us, and was there for us when we needed them., even if we didn't have the full benefits of “closeness”. Regardless of how you cut the mustard, and what the circumstances, Mom should be honored and we do so gladly, Cherish her, remember her, and don't hesitate to say, “We Love You, Mom”! Who else is more deserving of tributes?

Love You and Miss You Mom! Thanks for all you did for me and the rest of us kids!

JT

2010-05-04T23:24:00.000-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source

“JUST WHEN WE THOUGHT WE WERE OUT......”

With apologies to Michael Corleone, “just when we thought we were out, they pull us right back in!”
Yes, we had considered giving up our quest to offer enlightenment to the public, but the rash of “misinformation” was too much for us to just let slide by. In addition, we would be totally remiss if we ignored the numerous requests we get from young people and those who want to become involved. It is a shame, but it appears we are the only ones attempting to offer any rationale to those who have a serious interest in local government.

Unfortunately, one only needs to glance at the local “fish wrap” to understand that the “bean counters” who pass themselves off as “community leaders” don't have a clue as to the meaning of journalistic integrity. Their only real claim is that they have a monopoly and that they can continue to increase their bank account through advertising revenue.

They do have a couple of decent reporters, but it is unfortunate that these journalists suffer from a lack of good, honest management who can't separate personal friends from the realities of the world. It is sad that we “kill the messengers” who are merely trying to earn a paycheck while the bigger fish get fatter and more smug to add to their “independent” arrogance.

We have watched their hypocrisy in the ongoing conflict between their “fair haired” boy Chris Doherty and the City Council headed by Janet Evans. The cheap shots at Pat Rogan, Frank Joyce and Jack Loscombe speak volumes about the integrity of the “journalistic barons”. True, we are guilty as well, but we are an “opinion” and have that leeway. They, in contrast, are supposed to be an unbiased and fair publication. Yeah, sure!

Our “strong Mayor-weak Council” form of government is a prime example of what is wrong with this city and surrounding areas. The wealth of misinformation is left to compost itself, while the political diatribe and shenanigans of a totally incompetent individual are ignored, primarily because he is a boyhood friend...theirs, not ours.

During the course of Chris Doherty's political run, he has lowered the standards of political leadership to fit his own particular talents (?) and has been the primary instrument in running this community into the financial graveyard. His spending sprees, without oversight, have placed this city on the verge of financial ruin, yet not one word has been spoken against him by either the “media” or the Chamber of Commerce. He has never communicated with Council nor has he made any effort to address his constituents, the people of this city. Instead, he has fancied himself as being far too good, and too important to deal with the common taxpayer. Perhaps it is because he really can't provide an honest answer to an honest question! Or perhaps it is because he knows he can't justify his tax, borrow and spend policy to the taxpayer! His friends aren't affected so they couldn't care less!

In the interim, after the voting public ousted his two cohorts, Judy and Sherry, a new Council was elected, with only one Doherty holdover left. The voters spoke, and had a serious challenger campaigned, we might very well have had a new Mayor too. That didn't happen, so we were left with Doherty and the Evans, Rogan, Joyce, Loscombe super-majority on Council.

The new Council has accomplished more in a little over 4 months than the Doherty-led forces did in their entire two terms. We finally have a line of communication between Council and the taxpayers; an open door policy; and answers to questions asked by citizens. We no longer have the “Jerry Springer leftovers of Gatelli and Fanucci trying to exhalt themselves as “holier than thou”! We also have a degree of transparency which heretofore had not existed.

Yet who does the “media” slam...the Evans forces! That makes a lot of sense. In addition, the “media” allows an unprecedented amount of immature and ill-informed “bloggers” to malign Council members, though they do not identify themselves other than by “pseudonyms” which parallel the sophomoric tripe they dispense. “How much did Janet cost the city in the lawsuit?”, “What has the new council accomplished?”; “Janet writes all the 'stuff' for her cronies!”.

Let's get the facts straight...Janet didn't file the lawsuit, and it didn't cost the city anything since all the legal beagles are paid performers...The lawsuit was filed by Doherty, who didn't like being on the “wrong” side since he had always been on the “right” side, even though he pulled off the same capers during his tenure...the new Council has turned the “circus atmosphere” at Council into a pleasant exchange, and we no longer have to listen to Fanucci's lectures on dignity and decorum (when did she ever understand either term?). No longer are citizens subjected to the vitriol of Gatelli, who cost her own husband a chance at election to the school board due to her own shortcomings. Yes, Janet does offer input to her fellow council members, but she doesn't “script” anything. She is doing exactly what should be expected...offering her years of experience to them in order to help them over the hump.

This entire scenario is sad, even at the level of those seeking higher office in the upcoming primary election. Each and every one of the candidates is “above and beyond” accepting help from anyone with experience. Every one of the candidates has all the “political smarts” they will ever need, if you listen to them. That is precisely the reason they fall all over each other...trying to say the same thing with a different slant. Whoever has schooled them took the same page, from the same book, and has them believing they originated the idea. Even the President of the U.S. takes advice, but not our local “yokels”, er politicians. They are all too knowledgeable to benefit from the input of anyone who might be able to help! One even has the nerve too run for a higher office when he is a notorious stiff and can't even win a minor political office. And that's not just “my opinion”.

Anyway, for anyone who really knows Janet Evans, she is a dedicated school teacher; has a very serious back problem and wears a custom fitted brace; does collect a disability check which is considerably less than she is used to earning; and is not a “comp Queen” or “fat”. God how dense can some people be? Pat Rogan will be graduating soon with a degree in Political Science and has been around politics all his life. Frank Joyce is a graduate of Scranton Prep and the Univ. of Syracuse and is regarded by those who know him as a highly educated and intelligent individual. Jack Loscombe is a medically retired fire fighter who was seriously injured fighting a fire in Scranton, which nearly cost him his life. Are these the same people the “anonymous” bloggers know? We seriously doubt that! It is funny how a few of those “anonymous” bloggers stopped writing us after we replied to their e-mails. I guess they didn't know their e-mails weren't as “anonymous” as they are! Live and learn! We don't usually acknowledge letters or mail unsigned by the senders. Use your name or remain anonymous!

Fortunately, or unfortunately as the case may be, we don't rely on advertising dollars to support us and we don't cater to, or pander to anyone. We leave that up to the “media” in this community.

Over our many years in the business we have learned, to our chagrin, that we can only offer help to those who genuinely want it. There aren't that many in this area who want advice, nor will they accept it. They are so convinced of their own superior knowledge that they can't see the forest for the trees. It is rather odd that those are the same candidates who usually come out on the losing end. The same goes for a few others whose handlers try to shield them from “controversy”. That's always a good, smart, scenario ....hide from adversity and it will probably go away! Good luck!

If one would look back at the great empires which have crumbled, including the Holy Roman Empire, the Greek Empire and others, they would find that the leaders who chose to go it alone were the recipients of the “fall” of their empiric aspirations. That is precisely why those which survived for scores of years, and who employed “regents”, collapsed when the “big guy” got too arrogant and smug!

In the interim, Empire Nero Doherty continues to fiddle while his “Rome” is burning. Does he really think everyone is blind to his ineptness and his delusional dreams of a Doherty Dynasty? Does he really think he and his cohorts will survive the federal investigations going on around him? Even the dumbest of the dumb would realize that his “snake oil” pitch won't be good enough to beat the Feds!
It may take some time, and it probably will, but when the s--- hits the fan, we'll bet that Chris will be among the first to go down! He not only isn't smart enough, but his cohorts are just as arrogant and self-assured and watch the domino effect when the tide goes out.

Oh how the mighty will fall! And that, dear readers, is why we choose to stick around. Not to gloat, because we've been there many times before, but we relish the fact that we could say we “told you so”, if we were so inclined. Think what you may of us, but we have been around the horn a few times and have seen bigger, better and smarter politicians bite the dust. Funny, but we learned a long time ago that Scranton is not the center of the universe and is not exempt from outside scrutiny...especially when you continue to try to lie your way to the top and then have to answer for it! Good luck, Chris...you need it!

Oh, by the way...we are not in Janet's pocket, nor are we privy to “inside” information. If Janet is guilty of anything, it is that she is too honest for her own good. Vindictive...possibly...above it all...definitely not. Whatever her reasoning, it is a far cry better than what we have seen from the “powers that be”! Are we on her side....you'd better believe it because we really believe in her..and Pat, and Frank and Jack....until they prove differently! If that day comes, we'll be glad to admit we were taken in by them!

JT

2010-04-23T11:18:00.000-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source

A HARD LOOK AT CITY COUNCIL

It's been nearly four (4) months and it's time to take a good, hard look at the “new” City Council. We realize many will not be happy with what we have to say, but that's the way the cookie crumbles. It is not imperative that any of you read this publication. In many cases, as with a lot of our detractors, it is much better to be uninformed and for anyone who is really unhappy with us, we will gladly offer you a full rebate on your subscription, no questions asked.

Obviously, the “new” Council has not performed up to the expectations of a lot of our “informed” citizens. They've had almost one-quarter of a year to turn things around and have failed miserably!Have they reduced our debt, which is fast approaching the national debt of many smaller nations? NO!

Have they repaved our streets and removed the blight, especially in the downtown area? NO! Have they managed to bring new business in, i.e. General Motors; a Honda Motors plant; Boeing; General Dynamics; or a shipbuilding facility? NO!

They haven't even managed to bring in a “new” bar or Irish pub and haven't even seen the Grand Opening of any restaurant or bar which has chosen to move from one location to another and changed their name. Have they done anything to insure the survival of our local “developers”, attorneys, high-paying executives? NO! Have they done anything to insure that our police and firemen will continue to perform at below average wages, and will again be denied a contract or raise? NO!

Have they done anything to promote the health and welfare of our citizens, especially those major campaign contributors from Clarks Summit and surrounding communities? NO! What have they done to promote our Mayor's (?) campaign to bring more glory and accolades to himself (oops) City. NOTHING! How many lawsuits have they filed for feeling “threatened” by that bunch of rowdies who call themselves citizens and who actually attend Council meetings? And how many arrests have been made in Council Chambers of so-called citizens who tried to exercise their First Amendment rights? HA! Need we go on? Hell Yes! The people need to know the truth about this bunch of “phonies”!

Let's start at the top, with Janet Evans. She has the audacity to appear at Council meetings wearing a custom back-brace and struggling to walk. Who does she think she is? Obviously she is milking the system and should be back at work. Wasn't she a linebacker for the Philadelphia Eagles? Sorry, our mistake, she was a school teacher, and yeah, she did achieve a lot of acclaim for her teaching methods and extra-curricular work, but that was before she became a “comp Queen”!

And those two young “kids”, Pat Rogan and Frank Joyce. Where did they come from? Isn't Rogan the kid who was a “pizza maker” in between attending classes at Penn State and the U. and isn't he the same kid who is nearing graduation with a degree in Political Science or some other field which would put him in a great position to flip burgers? What can he possibly know? NOTHING!

And Joyce, where did he come from? How could this dumb kid, a graduate of Scranton Prep and Syracuse ever decide he could be a City Council member? What qualifies him to present complete and understandable financial reports to the general public? What is he trying to do, make the citizens aware of where their tax dollars have been going over the years? Is he crazy, or what? You never ever let the taxpayers know where their money is going. He obviously needs more training. Maybe Janet's script-writing isn't very clear to him. The nerve of this kid!

And that ex-fireman, now on disability, who has to give up his pension to serve his community. What's his name...Jack Loscombe? What right has he to sit in a Council seat and make decisions? Has he ever done anything like that before? Well, maybe he has...in his experience as a fireman, but so what? We all know that firemen in this city have the same respect as policemen! When did they become important?

And look at the waste of talent these people have caused They have deprived us of the wisdom of :Judge Judy” Gatelli and the profound lectures of “Oprah” Fanucci. They have allowed questions from citizens to be answered, and have even made efforts to communicate with the Mayor. What is wrong with these people? Don't they know they are supposed to be puppets and yes men?

They failed to renew the Junior Council, and now Dougie and Lee are forced to run for senior office positions. Oh, sorry, Lee was never in that group, merely an adviser. How could they relegate these astute political geniuses to the ranks of “common citizens”? Haven't they proven their value and loyalty to their causes, whatever they may be at the time? FOR SHAME!

And by all mean let's not forget Chris Evans, Janet's son. This kid has his nerve, running around promoting his Mother for anything just because he has been a major part of her campaigns and the fact she is his Mother. Does that justify such deplorable conduct? Is he trying to embarrass us with loyalty and dedication to his own Mother? Doesn't he realize that this just isn't done anymore? WOW! Talk about unmitigated gall! Actually being a loyal family member! FOR SHAME CHRIS!

And by the way, as an aside to our “informed” readers who bombarded us with letters about Chris's disgusting conduct.He can't help it if his Mother gave him a name. Too bad your's couldn't come up with something more original than “Anonymous”! Must be hell sharing that name with so many other “original thinkers”!

Oh well, at least we have tried to clarify things! Unfortunately, we must await the next lawsuit filed by Council; the next give-away of O.E.C.D. Funds; the next attempt to enlighten the citizenry; the next removal of TV from Council Chambers; the next Police presence at City Council meetings; and, of course, the next serious election when we can return to Scranton politics as usual. In the meantime, we can only hope that this transparency in government is a passing thing. We certainly wouldn't want to see an informed public! What would that do for all the “Anonymous” writers....would they have to go for spinal implants at the new Medical College? Gosh, that might be too much for them to bear!

JT

2010-04-21T13:03:00.001-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

PRIMARY UPON US (AGAIN?)

Yep, it's that time of the year again, Primary Election time, otherwise known as the “I'm better the other guys” season. Needless to say, virtually everyone in the Primary races is the better man (or woman) and it will be YOUR vote which will elect the candidate of your choice. Remember that!!!

To date, each and every candidate is the most viable, and has the best credentials. but so far, we haven't heard anything which would allow us to tell one from the other, with the exception of one senate candidate. That candidate, who is undoubtedly best qualified (in his own mind anyway) is a master of illusion (or should we say delusion) and actually makes the best case.

The “astute” politicians running for most jobs, actually don't have a clue as to what they are doing, but instead are relying on their own self-image and “friends” to elect them. Any tangible “statement” is nothing more than a rehash of old political rhetoric which has been around before most of them were born. Yet, they, and their “genius” campaign staff, actually believe that the voters have just recently fallen off the turnip truck on their way through this area. Lord, what a joke campaigns have become!

We've actually heard from one or two of these candidates, wanting to set-up a “sit-down” with us, but they all backed out, probably after the word got around that they were desperate enough to want us to interview them. The others, all of whom have the “inside” track, won't show their faces until election day, at which time they will bombard election workers with smiles, a box of Dunkin Donuts, and the belief that each will emerge victorious...all due to their “hard work”.

Just recently we saw a prime example of one “politician” who was “above it all” and campaigned as a “team” player, provided everybody else did his campaigning for him. His actual campaigning was limited to “photo ops” only, and he neglected to go to the voters themselves, rather opting to pander to his “staff” and “friends”. Guess where he finished up? And to think, he really had a chance at winning, if he had made an honest effort to win votes. Instead he chose to let others do his work for him. At least he came in second, in a two-man race, just reward for his “effort”!

We have some very sharp people running for office, especially if you ask them. Most would never condescend to the level of actually speaking with the voting public, especially the locals. How could they possible know anything? Instead, they continue to play “one upsmanship” games with their opponents, obviously afraid to face the real people, those who cast the votes. They rely on the free and “graciously” generous local media diatribe, and the sad part is, they really expect the public to buy into this garbage. Even the dumbest 2nd grader knows that what is printed in the local “fish wrap” is slanted to make only one candidate look good, and they've been playing that game for years. They wouldn't print an honest appraisal if their very existence depended on it. Ah, monopolistic enterprise!

Now, let's bring our take on this up to date. At least we can offer an honest appraisal of what is going on around here. Or, we can try, anyway.

Scranton and Lackawanna County are under serious investigation by federal agencies. The rampant corruption in this area is nothing new, but apparently someone decided they didn't want Luzerne County to be alone in these “trying times”. First our Housing Director, who has managed to stall his case for over two years, and now is suing for the “indignity” of having been suspended from his job, without a hearing. Of course he was gracious enough to wait until his pay checks expired before crying about his “unwarranted suspension”. In the interim, we have to wonder how many more of the local Housing Authority dominoes will fall, especially since as “director” , he was supposed to answer to his “Board” . At least in theory, there are others who should fall too, since they should have been aware of what was going on over the years, unless they weren't really doing their jobs. Allegedly, if they signed off on his “misdeeds”, they are equally responsible and should be held accountable. Not likely to happen, but it should put a few of them on notice....you have to be a lot smarter than you have been if you want to beat the system....and they haven't shown too much “smarts”, rather displaying arrogance over their “connections” and “immunity” (?). Advice to them: best you stop believing your own hype!

County-wide, the mighty have fallen! One commissioner in trouble, and an ex-commissioner on the verge of a long-term relationship with a new “residence”; other “elected politicians” facing plans for “retirement”, either forced or voluntary; local “wannabees” jumping into the freshly opened graves of the “outies”, all claiming to offer bigger and better things to come. Can they show us any results from their previous office efforts, or tangible results from any other civic involvement? Just the same old tired rhetoric, passed on by inept campaign leaders, who never seem to learn from past experiences.

Now you know why we said we would not be endorsing anyone in this Primary. We can't find anyone we really believe in, and certainly won't give credence to these phony pledges!As the cannibal chef said to his patrons. “the reason politicians are so expensive on the menu is due to the fact that are all so full of s--- it takes all day to clean them”! Please, somebody prove us wrong?

We have to take note of one particular candidate though, and we'll leave his identity up to you too determine! This guy has only missed out on one or two opportunities for self-destruction, so far. One is the chance to blame the Icelandic volcano eruption on Janet Evans and City Council, and to claim that he can create another 6,000 high-paying jobs to clean up the “ash” fallout from that event. His “mentor” will probably claim that he will form a committee to study the feasibility of moving that volcano to Scranton as another brilliant move. First they must get approved for a K.O.Z., then get a group of big money investors involved, who will then go to O.E.C.D. for grant money. Once approved, they will then spend the next ten years figuring out ways to spend the money, before re-applying for new development grants. By that time, a new and younger group of “inbred” politicians will be ready to take over, and the area should see a resurgence of “brain drainers” who have completely lost their minds and decided to move back here and assume the multi- zillion dollar debts accrued by their “ancestors”.

And, lest we forget, the trials of the alleged “perps” will at least be close to starting...providing the Federal Courthouse has not been sold off to the new Medical Center or the U. in hopes of attracting
more students, who will repopulate our City and bring new jobs in. That's what dreams are made of!

JT

2010-04-18T05:56:00.001-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

INTROSPECTION TIME!

The last few weeks have been stressful, to say the least, with so much happening in our life. We have suffered the loss of several of our friends, most of whom passed due to the ravages of old age. While we tried to do our best to extend our condolences and to make attempts to personally attend viewings and funerals, it turned out we just couldn't do it all.

That, friends, led us to do a little introspection. For the benefit of those who don't know the word, it means basically concentrating on your own feelings and thoughts, something we all should do on a regular basis.

When I was younger, and “invincible”, I was a part of the “Bohemian” and “beatnik” generation. We were unquestionably the most intelligent and literate group on the face of the earth. Not only were we far and away much smarter than our parents, and those who were “over 30” and “out of touch”, but we
also were not subject to the “cares and worries” of our society. We set style trends; led carefree lives; did what we “knew” was best for us; and, most of all, we were “individuals”! I don't recall who it was, but I know it was one of the greats” of our generation...Larry Ferlinghetti, or someone else, who stated that “Introspection is 'masturbation' of the mind”, and we probably believed him.

It was a fun time...George Carlin, and Richard Pryor were on the way to comedic stardom; Elvis was making a major dent in the music business; Lenny Bruce had made a “statement” which saw his career go down the tubes; Richie Havens and John Sebastian were becoming stars; Janis Joplin, Peggy Lee, the “hot” jazz bands at NYC's Metropole; Jimi Hendrix, and of course “Woodstock”. It was all right there, in our reach, and readily available. And, boy, did we take advantage of it.

Somewhere along the way, we lost a few friends, mostly to accidental deaths, or some strange disease such as polio, or leukemia, but we didn't obsess because we knew it “couldn't happen to us”. Then came Korea, and Viet Nam, and we lost others, even suffering the indignity of being injyred ourselves during one of these “conflicts”. Again, we realized we were “invincible”.

Along the way, probably as we began to approach that “30” mark, we encountered a poem, published by Ann Landers, I believe, which was entitled “Around the Corner I Have A Friend”. It told of our “friend” who lived a short distance away, and how we always had good intentions to visit that friend, but somehow we never made it. Finally, when we did decide to visit him, we were told he had passed away. That's when it set in. The guilt trip that we all encounter during our lifetimes.

Why had we been so self-absorbed that we couldn't take a few minutes of our precious time to visit that friend? Why was our “all important” dinner date, or other social gathering so important that we could'nt
find a few minutes to walk a couple of blocks to see our friend?

Then the scourge of the AIDS epidemic claimed dozens of folks we knew, had worked with and been in social contact with. We lost our parents, aunts, uncles, cousins and numerous idols from show business, sports, the music field, et al.

We began to develop aches and pains in places on our bodies that we didn't even know existed. The receding hairline, the spare tire around our midsection, and worse, we were no longer able to keep up the social grind of work all day, play all night, and still manage to get to work on time the next day. I guess that's when we began to suffer the indignity of realizing that maybe, just maybe, we really weren't invincible.

We had been through the whole “nine yards” of the civil rights movement, the protests, the “reality of backlashes”, and suddenly we began to realize, there is something much more to life than being that “individual” we all thought we were. Yeah, we were tired of being “ostracized” by the “older +30's generation” when it suddenly dawned on us...we had become that generation.

Several years ago, while living in Georgia, I decided to look up two old buddies from my time in the
Army in Korea. One lived some 30 miles away, and when I tracked him down, and called the house, his daughter informed me that he had passed away a few month previous. The second friend, with whom I had become very close, was found to be living just minutes away, in an adjoining town. I “googled” his name and discovered his address and phone number, but was shocked when the site also revealed he had been a prosperous businessman, local politician and was being buried that very day.

Yes...around the corner I had a friend. But I didn't take the time to visit them. Now, in my waning years, I have lost several friends within a very short span of time. Might I be next? No one really knows. I have cheated death on many occasions, from being a “war casualty” to suffering several heart attacks and “triple bypass surgery”! I guess the realization has set in....no, I am not invincible!

Perhaps the reason I write this is because I have noticed so many others who are undergoing the same “attitude” problems that I encountered. You mean well, and I know you don't realize just how self-centered and vain you have become over the years, (even the younger generation), but if there is one piece of advice I can offer, it is simply this.....”around the corner you have a friend”...take the time to visit and to “smell the roses”. Life is a lot shorter than we think, but we have to realize something very important. Neither YOU nor I am irreplaceable, and regardless of what we think, this is one part of the “system” that none of us is going to beat.

There is the story of the man who dies and goes to Heaven. He gets the chance to evaluate both Heaven and Hell, for one day each, then he must make a decision, as to where he will spend eternity. Heaven is great, but his short visit to Hell surprises him when he encounters revelry, everything he ever wanted in life, and good cheer. He makes his decision and St, Peter assigns him to Hell. On his return, he finds everything has changed and Hell is exactly as we have been led to believe. He asks the Devil what happened and why the sudden change. That's when the Devil tells him...”Yesterday we were busy campaigning...today you voted!”

That, dear friends, is food for serious thought! Take life seriously, and do your part, but always remember...”Around The Corner You Have A Friend!” Take the time to enjoy that friend! Tomorrow may be too late!
JT

2010-04-18T05:56:00.000-07:00

2010-04-07T22:30:00.000-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher
BAKER MERRY-GO-ROUND CONTINUES
The ongoing saga of the U.S. Government vs. suspended Scranton Housing Authority Director David Baker has once again been placed “on hold”. Baker, who faces a 16 count indictment on a variety of charges, including fraud, had been scheduled for trial on April 19th, but due to another series of legal maneuvers the “trial” has been postponed until June 21st. This case has been scheduled and postponed for over two years, following an F.B.I. raid of Scranton Housing Authority's headquarters.

Baker, who received pay and benefits for “time he never took off and sick days” despite being suspended, has also filed a lawsuit against MaryAnn Sinclair, Board Chairman, and the S.H.A.after the paychecks stopped coming in, alleging he was suspended “illegally” , without a “fair hearing”. The trial has been scheduled and rescheduled numerous times since the indictments were handed down.

DOHERTY vs. CITY COUNCIL FIASCO CONTINUES TOO

Mayor Chris Doherty has once again made an attempt to retain his “dictatorship” by having “his candidate” seated at a Redevelopment Authority meeting rather than Andy Sbraglia who was nominated for the seat by City Council in a 4-1 vote. Doherty's nominee for reappointment had been rejected by Council when he was declared “ineligible” due to the expiration of the allotted time for the renomination and his refusal to appear before council or submit a resume.

The move by Doherty now places the City in another awkward position, effectively “voiding” any actions by the Board which could be ruled in violation should the matter go to court, a highly likely possibility.

It appears it is time for a Federal action to be taken place to resolve Doherty's ongoing “quest for supreme power”. In addition to disgracing his elected office by his seeking first the Democratic nomination for Governor, then Lt. Governor, and now the State Senate seat held by retiring Sen. Bob Mellow, Doherty has attempted to subvert the powers of City Council, the official legislative branch of city government.

He has instructed “his” department heads at City Hall and throughout the various “authorities” that they should not talk to City Council unless he grants approval. Attempts by Council to seek answers to numerous questions from varied departments have been met with refusal by these departments.

It would appear that Doherty has declared himself “Supreme Power” over the City and consequently has triggered a ridiculous chain of events which has made Scranton the laughing stock of the nation.

Granted, if the Mayor chooses to portray himself as a “power-mad ass”, that is his prerogative, but in the interim, the entire city suffers from this chain of immature and childish moves by an “alleged” leader. This is the same guy who wants to be a State leader? SURE, CHRIS! WE'RE STUPID!

The case of Doherty vs. City Council, presently in Judge Mazzoni's court, should be resolved on April 16th, unless he chooses to continue this charade of “Emperor Doherty”. Again, this is the path this “clown” has chosen, and he will face the ultimate consequences.

In view of the ongoing F.B.I. investigation into political corruption in this area, it will be interesting to hear Doherty's appointees refuse to talk to the Feds without “the Boss's “ O.K. We would normally bet heavily against that happening, but in view of the “egomaniacal” antics at City Hall, forget it. We're hedging our bets.

Anyway, our solution to the problem is simple: Since Doherty feels he owns the staff at City Hall, let him pay them out of his own pockets instead of using taxpayer money. It's simple Chris, YOU OWN 'EM...YOU PAY “EM”...and by the way, keep looking over your shoulder because we feel sure the Feds are right behind you! And, if the end result is what we anticipate, you won't have to seek elected office...more likely you will have an “appointed job”...hope you can learn how to make license plates! And don't worry, you shouldn't be too lonely...we're sure a lot of your “appointees” will be right there alongside of you! That way you can have the best of both worlds...Karma is great wake up call!

PRIMARY ELECTION FOR MAY

The upcoming “off-year” Primary Election is fast approaching and candidates for several important offices are scrambling for their party nominations. This should be a very interesting election.

We will nominate candidates for Governor, Lt. Governor, and a Congressman, State Representative, a State Senator and a bevy of other “openings” in our area. Beleaguered State Senator Bob Mellow is retiring; Gov. Ed Rendell is out due to term limits; and Congressman Paul Kanjorski is facing a serious challenge to his reelection from both sides. State Reps Kevin Murphy and Ken Smith are facing opposition from both sides as well.

Since we have not been privy to the campaigns of any of the candidates, and we have been largely ignored by the candidates, we will not be endorsing anyone for any of the offices up for grabs.

We don't know if it's the candidates, or their “handlers” but somebody is making a big mistake. Regardless of the reasons for our “isolation”, and we really don't care, we feel these astute candidates can seek other sources for getting their message out. Our readers know where we stand, and we haven't deviated from our mission of keeping the public informed, without worrying about financial concerns and paid advertising.

Since we are a one-person, unpaid, operation, we aren't beholden to anyone nor can we be pressured by politicians who threaten to “withhold” their blessings. Our readerships continues to grow, throughout the U.S. and abroad, and we do have some impact, small as it may be!

Good luck in gaining the support of the monopoly media! You certainly are going to need it! Of course you can always pander to them for their support, but you'd better be representing “their” interests, not those of the voting public. Isn't that the “way it's always been”? JT

2010-04-01T11:42:00.001-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

THE TRUTH IS OUT....WE CONFESS!

Finally, after years of speculation by our detractors, the truth is out! YES, we are guilty and have been for quite some time. We confess....we have been plotting the overthrow of the elected government of
“Chrisjerkistan”.

YES, we did plot to eliminate certain members of that government, to wit “Judymouthowitz” and “Sherrydipoviditz”, and we hope we were instrumental in eliminating those two “Misstresses of Misinformation”! We sure would like to take the credit, but that belongs to our underlings, the “Voterovists”.

And YES, we have conspired to derail the “Inconsistent Speedtrain LeeDougnil”, perennial candidates of the “Switcherooski Party”.. For this, we do accept credit, although the founders of that line have a lot to do with it...yet continue to plod forward!

NOW, after many have been disseminating “inside information”, we have been exposed. In a way, it is a relief, because now we can be totally honest! It's been a great ride!

As agents of the outspoken government of “Kizmiazowitz”, it can be told...to quote the unforgettable Rhett Butler...”Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn!”

Fact of the matter is, we really don't! Politicians are politicians, and if you can't understand that, by all means continue to support “Chrisjerkistan's leader, “Dohothedski”. He needs all the help he can get!

In the interim, please take note of the beads of perspiration on the foreheads of many of the once “untouchables” ! Even in near-freezing temperatures, many seem to have a problem with acceptance of the inevitable. As the old saying goes, “What goes around, comes around”! Hurts, doesn't it?

Meantime, to Mr. Anonymous and all his friends (they all seem to have a spelling problem), I can only say....”Long Live Kizmiazowitz!” Feel free to take us up on this offer at any time! AND, that also goes for our “fair weather” friends, the politicians. When you need us, don't waste the phone call!
JT

2010-03-28T14:09:00.000-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

HOUSING AUTHORITY DIRECTOR
TRIAL SET FOR APRIL 19TH

Former Scranton Housing Authority Director David Baker is scheduled for trial in Federal Court on Monday, April 19th. Baker, who has been the beneficiary of several postponements since his indictment in 2008 on 16 counts of fraud, misuse of government funds, wire fraud and several other charges , incl-uding influence/injuring officer, fraud and false statements and theft or bribery.

Baker, who was suspended from his job, has filed suit against the Scranton Housing Authority and Mary Ann Sinclair, president of that Board, claiming he was unduly suspended without a fair hearing.

During his suspension, Baker received his salary, based on claims he was entitled to compensation for sick days and days he was entitled to take off but never used. The pay was recently cut-off with the explanation he had exhausted his compensatory time. It was at this time that Baker filed his lawsuit.

Jury selection had been scheduled earlier, but due to legal maneuvering, the case had been postponed for various motions and procedural claims. Jury selection is slated to begin on that date and it is expected that several employees of the Housing Authority will present testimony in the case. Sources say that depositions from several employees were instrumental in the decision to indict.

Housing Authority officials refused to discuss the Baker case and referred questions to their solicitor.

Acting Housing AuthorityDirector Gary Pelucacci was appointed to fill Baker's job pending resolution of the court case. Comment on Baker's suit against the Housing Authority was also declined.

HOW FAR WILL MAYOR v COUNCIL SPLIT GO?

The ongoing saga between Mayor Chris Doherty and Scranton City Council continues! The Mayor, who can't decide on running the City or trying to run State Government affairs, appears to be hell bent on maintaining what he considers a voter mandate. What Doherty fails to accept is the fact that his previous Council was ousted by voters and the “new” council was duly elected.

During his term of office, the City has failed to resolve an ongoing problem with police and firefighters, over pay raises; has threatened to eliminate more public safety jobs and to close fire stations. Yet, he continues to claim the Council is in violation of the “law” (?) and that Council's revision of his budget is “illegal”. He asserts public safety has been compromised by Council's decisions, yet he does not offer substantiation for his claims, including why he gave raises to the Police and Fire Chiefs and now opposes cutting their salaries.

The Mayor stands behind the “Home Rule Charter” and the alleged powers it affords him, yet he has violated the same Charter when he deemed it fit to do so. He was responsible for budget revisions while Finance Chair of the City Council, yet he condemns the present Finance Chair for attempting the same maneuver. He has attempted to move his agenda forward, without challenge during councils which he previously controlled, but seethes at the “super majority” council which opposes his agendas.

Council President Janet Evans, a known opponent of the Mayor, has outmaneuvered Doherty since assuming her new position, and has proven to be a more than worthy opponent. Under her leadership, the new Council has managed to restore dignity to Council meetings; offer hope for the City government to be returned to the taxpayers, and offered more transparency in government.

New Councilmen Pat Rogan, Frank Joyce and Jack Loscombe have come under fire as “puppets” of the Evans-led coalition, yet Doherty remained silent about his “puppets”, Judy Gatelli, Sherry Fanucci and Bob McGoff. Only McGoff remains on Council.

The Doherty-Evans “tug of war” will likely continue, at least until it is either resolved by the courts, or the sides compromise, an unlikely scenario. In the interim, Doherty continues to make ludicrous claims of how he has “turned” the city around, created new jobs (?) and made Scranton a better place to live.

Prior to his recent reelection, Doherty publicly acknowledged that he was running for Governor, then Lt,. Governor, and now for retiring State Sen. Robert Mellow's seat. He was a strong supporter of Mellow, a man who has been the subject of much controversy, especially his “dealings” as a State Senator and allegedly misusing State funds to pay rental on property he owned. Doherty has flip-flopped so much recently, that even he is probably unclear what office he is seeking.

There is no secret that Mrs. Evans' desire to be Mayor has long been accepted. It was highly anticipated that she would have run against Doherty during the last campaign, but the entry of Gary DiBileo as a
Mayoral challenger spoiled that move. Instead, DiBileo latched on to the Evans campaign and nearly pulled off an upset. His failure to vigorously campaign was the prime reason for his failure to win, and his attempt to make the Evans team a part of his agenda failed miserably.

Doherty, on the other hand, has been hesitant to accept the fact that Mrs. Evans' popularity as a candidate results in higher vote result numbers, and she continually is among the leaders in results. It is odd that Doherty fails to accept that while he remains adamant about seeking higher office, he has given Mrs. Evans the opportunity to become the next Mayor, should Doherty win Mellow's seat. No matter how you “cut the mustard”, Doherty will end up with “egg on his face” and embarrassed by his
recent failures. He continues to be his own worst enemy. We hope his challengers are taking notes, because this guy is definitely beatable, especially outside Scranton!

Whatever the outcome of Judge Mazzoni's decision, don't expect to see the Doherty-Evans feud come to an end soon. Neither side is willing to concede and Doherty has refused to “talk” to Council, unless it is on his terms. It's a watch and see show, and all we can say is continue to give the Evans team a chance to prove their worth. So far, so good!
JT

2010-03-24T00:13:00.000-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

“THE PROOF IS IN THE PUDDING!”

Time to take a real look at the changes in Scranton's City Government. And, like it or not, these changes are real!

Since Janet Evans has taken over as Council President, she has been maligned, ridiculed and been the subject of some pretty low blows. Pat Rogan and Frank Joyce, elected on a ticket headed by Mrs. Evans have also been the subject of cheap shots. Now, even Jack Loscombe, appointed to replace new Tax Collector Bill Courtright, is the latest subject of venomous attacks. Let's see what they have done!

The “new” council voted to cut Mayor Chris Doherty's budget in order to effect a savings of over $700,000 and eliminate waste. Doherty overrode the cuts, and his veto was over-ridden by Council in the first “super majority” action. Doherty then elected to “sue” Council over the actions, and, armed with his “team” of lawyers went to court. Sad, but very true.

Doherty's “power grab” is, on the surface, a vain attempt to continue his policy of “I am the sole power” in the City. Now in a Court of Law, he alleges that his budget was legally passed and Council had no authority to revise it. It had been passed by the previous council, made up of Mrs. Evans and Courtright who were the minority against Doherty's team of Gatelli, Fannuci ad McGoff. The new council elected to revisit the budget and make changes.

The Mayor claims Council has no legal standing to amend his budget. Let's look back to recent years. It was the same Chris Doherty, then Finance Chair of City Council, who led the fight to amend the budget of Mayor Jimmy Connors in 2000. Council consisted of Doherty, Pocius, Hazzouri, Reap and Murphy. That action, an amendment (file of Council No. 97, 2000), was legally and lawfully adopted, replacing Connors' budget which had been through the same process (file of Council No. 77, 2000). That was under the aegis of then Finance Chair Chris Doherty!

Now, with the shoe on the other foot, Doherty is crying foul and challenging the action in court. It is obvious that the page “torn from his book” should not have been used by this new council. “I'm taking my ball and running home”? Let's hope Judge Mazzoni has the foresight to question Doherty about “his” game and why it was legal then.

Since Doherty has been Mayor, the City has suffered a net loss of 53 employees. In 2003, 27 positions were eliminated, (119 clerical and 8 Federally funded police officers). An additional 100 city employees were forced out of their jobs because of a threat of losing their health insurance if they didn't leave by Jan. 1, 2003. 100 left, with full benefits, and 100 were hired, with full benefits, to replace them. Did the Mayor meet with the clerical union or department heads to discuss that procedure? Didn't he claim the city was distressed and it would have to do more, with less?

In his last 9 budgets, Doherty has eliminated jobs, claiming, in his lawsuit, that the present council is doing irreparable harm to the citizens of Scranton and placing our safety at risk by amending his budget. Isn't that exactly what he has been doing during his terms in office? Did he discuss the cuts with anyone, including department heads? Did any of “his” council discuss cuts with those affected? And, isn't he the same guy who wanted to cut back on fire stations and eliminate firefighters from jobs?

Shame on Mrs. Evans, Frank Joyce and Pat Rogan for doing what Doherty has been doing all these years. Chris Doherty didn't invent this game, but he sure tried to master it. Now that he has been on the other side of the fence, he is whining and trying to play the martyr. This is the guy who wants to aspire to “higher” office. Yeah, right! He can't run a city, except further into the ground, and he wants a shot at
the State level? We hope his opponents won't hesitate to use these facts in their campaign against this charlatan. That is, if he survives the current investigation by the Feds.

Why is it so hard for Doherty's supporters to accept the fact that the new council seems to be on the right track to bring the government back to the people? Can't they see the forest for the trees, or are they blinded by Doherty's “public image” of “Chris Almighty?” Is transparency a bad thing?

On the tax front, let's take a closer look. Since assuming the position of Collector of Taxes, Bill Courtright's office has achieved the following: In one year, (3/22/09 to 3/22/10) real estate tax collections have jumped by $2, 315, 639.05. Wage tax collections are up by $1,105,803.56; LST/EMS is up by $5,837.82 and BP/Mercantile taxes are up by $182,917.41. The total is up by $3,610,197.84.
Seems to this writer that Courtright is obviously doing something right! Maybe Doherty can answer why this change has come about?

Funny thing is, during the time we were at the County Courthouse during the Doherty vs Council lawsuit, we had the opportunity to see Stu Renda, Business Administrator, answer simple questions and fail miserably. Could he show where public safety was affected by Council's budget cuts? NO! Could he explain what cuts affected the city and caused “irreparable harm”? NO! Consequently, the Judge ordered the two sides to seek common ground before returning to court. What's next, sue the Court for doing “irreparable” harm to Doherty's image? Who knows, that may be his next stupid move!

Incidentally, since Chris Doherty wants full control over department heads, and his staff, including preventing Council, the official legislative body of Scranton, from contacting them without his permission, shouldn't Doherty be paying this group out of his own pocket? After all, they are city employees and paid by the taxpayers. If it is Doherty's intent to be “King”, he shouldn't expect the over-taxed citizens to subsidize his “Court”! Dig into your own pockets, Chris. They're your babies!

Now, to satisfy the Doherty supporters, and polish up Chris's tarnished image (self-imposed) I do respectfully suggest to Council than an amendment be introduced to change the name of Scranton to “Dohertyburg” and we could change our motto to “The ECCENTRIC City”. Why not? We could even move him into his beloved $300,000 tree house in Nay Aug Park. He doesn't use his present office! And, we could even add on a guest room for Austin Burke.

Thought of the Day: What two perennial candidates can't seem to make up their minds which side they are on? And where did they get their legal and political knowledge? Anyone want to guess?

JT

2010-03-22T20:29:00.000-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

LETTER FROM A “BRAIN DRAINER”

The following letter was received from a former Scranton resident, now living in Wilmington, Delaware. It is presented without editing:

“Dear Mr. Talamini

I believe you have missed a very important point regarding Scranton's “Brain Drain”. I hope this letter will clarify the prime cause for the exodus of Scranton's young people.

My family has lived on the Westside for many years, and I was born and raised here. I graduated from West High and Lackawanna College before leaving to go to Lehigh, from where I graduated. I had to earn my way through college...no scholarships, no connections.

After many futile attempts to gain a decent job in Scranton, I accepted an offer from a well-known company here in Wilmington. Today, at the age of 26, I am earning over $30,000 per year, plus bonuses for my work. This I could never have achieved in my home town. I'll tell you why.

Scranton is, and has been, a “closed society” and will continue on that path. While the rhetoric about “great job opportunities” continues, that is nothing but a pack of political lies.

There are jobs available in Scranton, a few of them relatively high paying. However, if you try to apply for one you will find that unless you are among the “in” crowd, politically connected, or a friend of a friend, you don't stand a chance. Most of the good paying jobs are available only if you are in a position to “bid” on them, which means you must already be employed by the agency, or have a relative in position to “assist” you in gaining employment.

City and county jobs are reserved for relatives, political cronies, or campaign contributors. Look around and you will see husbands and wives, both employed in politically expedient jobs, i.e. an attorney in one office and an attorney in another office; a long-time contributor who has relatives employed in other jobs, also “created” by the politicians for cronies; close relatives of someone who has a job within the “structure”; and a variety of other reasons. Unfortunately, my family is not Irish, not politically connected, and we are just above the poverty level, income wise.

My father worked hard at low paying jobs to keep his family fed, clothed and housed. My mother did odd jobs while raising three kids who she had high hopes for. My older brother is a career military man since he has no chance for employment here. My sister is married and lives in Tennessee with her husband, a small business owner. My folks are still paying a mortgage on a house which has seen better days. They can barely make ends meet with the continued increase in taxes and the cost of living.

Unfortunately, they are unable to sell their house due to the depressed status of the real estate market, contrary to what the local politicians would have you believe.

At least five of my friends from school have moved on to greener pastures and are making far above the median income in Scranton. They too had no opportunity to crack Scranton's “closed society” nor could they get a foot in the door. Others of my friends are still living in Scranton, and the best any of them can do is a $10 to $12 per hour job, in the labor force. They have little hope for their future as long as they remain in the Northeast Pa. Area. The jobs just aren't there for the average man, or woman.

For younger people, there really isn't anything to do in Scranton anymore. What hasn't been sold off to the University, or reserved for the elites, is no longer available. Businesses do not want to move into the city because they cannot afford the taxes and the lack of shoppers. Wage taxes and exorbitant rents make doing business in Scranton a no-brainer. The average business cannot sustain itself without the help of outside agencies. People would rather shop at Viewmont Mall, the Wal Mart area, or Montage Mtn. where they have a wider variety, better parking and safer environ. Can you blame them?

I was home recently and was amazed at what passes for “progress” along Lackawanna Ave. and Wyoming Ave. Your mayor claims he is revitalizing the city. His rhetoric is to be equated with the cemetery plot salesman who sells you on the idea of “perpetual care” (?); the used care salesman who tells you that wreck he is trying to sell you was only driven by a little old lady, on Sundays, to and from church, or the real estate agent who tells you that prices will be rising in the very near future.

All I saw was vacant lots, empty stores and offices, and potholes galore. Is this what you would call “progress”? There are still empty buildings which were supposed to bring in “new business”. The only thing new is a change of names for the bars and most of what passes for restaurants in center city. Try to get a sandwich or a cup of coffee downtown after 5 p.m. And why would anyone pay $15-20 for a meal which they could get elsewhere for less than $10? Most of Scranton's citizens cannot afford the $45-50 tickets to attend a function at the “Cultural Center”, even if they could find a place to park and walk safely to the Center. And what is there for the kids to do, besides hang out and get into trouble?

I read your newsletter on-line regularly and agree with you 90% of the time. However, I do hope you will find some way to awaken the people of Scranton to the fact that they live in a “closed society” and have no hope of getting into the “inner circle” without pandering to the political powers. Hopefully, we can get my folks to move out of that “distressed” city and into a healthier and happier environment. I urge everyone, either do something to help change Scranton, or get out. It's a big world out there, and the opportunities are plentiful. All it takes is the will to make a change in your life. I did, and I and my friends who did the same are all enjoying a better way of life.

Thanks for the opportunity to tell you my story, and I trust those who know me will follow my advice. Please withhold my name, as my parents still live there and I fear they will be the victims of retaliation by the politicians who are selling everyone their “progress” crap. Feel free to edit this letter if you plan on using it. Just accept my thanks for your efforts and keep up the good work.” (anonymous)

(we edited out only three personal lines which did not contribute to this letter's intent.) JT

2010-03-19T04:18:00.001-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

THE S--- HAS HIT THE FAN!

As we have been saying for the past three years, the House of Cards has begun to collapse. At the risk of being called a “Glory Whore” (again), we have been hammering this issue home for that long. First with Scranton at Large, and then with JT's OPINION.

During this period, we have been ridiculed and maligned for our stance and our predictions. So what?
We certainly aren't taking any delight in seeing this story unfold, and we certainly do understand, as pointed out by a friend, that “there is no perfect world”! True, but there is no reason why so many people, especially those in the know, let this “political imperfection” continue and now want to grandstand, calling for everybody's head. Where have all you critics been while this mess was being uncovered? And why are you suddenly so concerned? Shouldn't you have been concerned all along?

Two Lackawanna County Commissioners, one ex and one still in office have been indicted by a Federal Grand Jury, alleging a string of corrupt practices and accepting kick-backs. Like it or not, these are just that, allegations. Under our system of law, they are innocent until proven guilty, and we will afford them that consideration. They are not the first to go down! Remember Scranton Housing Authority Director David Baker? His case is still pending, after at least two years of prolonging his inevitable trial. Again, where were all the “shocked” people while this mess was going down over so many years?

Now, everyone wants to know .”who are the contractors involved?” so we can go after them. This question was posed during the news conference announcing the indictments, and the media was told the “Grand Jury did not wish to disclose the names” of the contractors. Sorry, folks, but it looks like we are going to have to wait for that information since Grand Jury information is not for public disclosure.

Actually, we can be thankful for that fact, otherwise the “witch hunt” would be in full swing to “hang 'em from the yardarms”! Again, there is no tangible evidence that anyone, including these contractors, deliberately attempted to bribe anyone. However, there may very well be evidence that they were coerced by elected officials to either “pay up or you won't get the contract”! This scenario is highly more likely.

Funny, but many of these contractors, or vendors, also do business with the city, and there is little doubt that the Feds are also investigating Scranton and it's political shenanigans. We have been “told” of arm-twisting by Scranton elected officials to “put your money in the right place” or contracts would not be renewed. There have also been conversations regarding the awarding of O.E.C.D. Funds; K.O.Z.'s
and other questionable transactions at the city taxpayers' expense. Contracts have been awarded by elected officials to friends & family members, and jobs have been created for, and handed to political cronies. Where was the outcry when all this was taking place on the local scene?

In the last election, the people ousted two city council members, because the voters obviously were fed up with their antics and refusal to be open and above-board in their dealings. The same administration has been in power for more than eight years, and has brought the city to its knees, financially, yet this administration was awarded another four years to continue on the same path. Where was the outcry then? Instead of changing the scenario, the voters elected a new “majority” to City Council, supposedly to allow for checks and balances.

Now, less than three months into their term, the new “super majority” is being chastised for trying to bring openness and transparency back into local government. The atmosphere at City Council meetings has been returned to a degree of normalcy; citizen speakers are accorded respect and are not the subject of ridicule and derisiveness; city council has finally scrutinized the budget and is making attempts to effect changes; yet they are being sued for putting the “safety, health and welfare of the city” in jeopardy.

Funny, but on the witness stand, under oath, a member of the administration could not justify these claims. In actuality, not an ounce of truth about the Mayor's claims was substantiated during the open court session. Suddenly, as if struck by a conscience which heretofore had not been evidenced, an “open discussion” is in the offing and the two sides are meeting (?) to seek agreement on the cuts.

Perhaps if our Mayor had been more open and willing to meet with this legislative body, all this could have been prevented. And perhaps, if he had been more willing to address the public, in open forum, this could have been prevented. Instead, he has played his hand, as usual, and now finds himself backed into a corner. Will he eat crow? We doubt it, but he will be faced with the embarrassment of having his bluff called, and the fact that his intransigence is the reason for this whole fiasco.

We can malign city council all we want, but facts are facts. Council is made up of four people who seem to believe the government is the peoples' business, and one carry-over who is so blinded by his dedication and loyalty that he sounds like a muppet. Sad, but true, and its there, like it or not!

Actually, though we are not gloating over our one-man campaign for reform in this city, we are delighting in the fact that the Feds are soon going to get the foxes out of the hen house. We feel very confident in the fact that when the Feds actually hit the city (and they are doing it now), the Luzerne County investigations, and the Lackawanna County Commissioners indictments will prove to be only the tip of the ice berg. There are many questions which will probably be asked; i.e. who benefited personally from the awarding of contracts; how many high-paying jobs were awarded without benefit of open bids; why are there so many job openings which are not available to the average citizen; what happened to all those high ticket loans to developers, and other businesses, many of which are not yet paid back? And of course the long-term leases to wealthy developers, at the expense of city taxpayers; the give-away of city land; the sell-out to non-profits; the contract award to friends and relatives; and of course, the “undisclosed” dealings of the various authorities in this town? How many heads will roll?

Sure we're negative, but if it wasn't for our negativity, and probing, would any of this have been uncovered? Let's hope we can soon become far more positive. We'd love to have a chance at it! In the interim, let's give the “new” council a chance. We have a learned councilwoman, with experience; two young men who seem dedicated and honest, and one retired firefighter who has been “screwed” out of his pension because he chooses to serve his city! Does anybody smell a rat there?
JT

2010-03-16T13:15:00.001-07:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

MUNCHAK, CORDARO INDICTED
FEDS LIST CHARGES

Former Lackawanna County Majority Commissioner Robert Cordaro and A.J. Munchak, were indicted today on 40 counts by a federal grand jury.

In a news conference held at the Federal Courthouse, U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Dennis C. Pfannenschmidt, accompanied by F.B.I. Special Agent Janice Fedarcyk and Troy Stemen, Acting Special Agent in Charge for the Internal Revenue Service annou8nced the indictment and the following charges:

Racketeering and related charges in connection with alleged improper actions in accepting payments and other benefits from individuals and entities doing business with Lackawanna County

Fraud, extortion, bribery and federal tax violations and that they received hundreds of thousands of dollars of illegal payments and other benefits.

In addition, Cordaro faces additional charges of money laundering and conspiracy.

Along with the criminal charges, the indictment seeks forfeiture of at least $450,000 from both defendants which is alleged to be the proceeds of the charged criminal activity.

If convicted, Cordaro faces a maximum of 364 years and $7, 750,000 while Munchak is facing a possible 193 years and $3, 250,000.

When queried, the fed investigators would not discuss the possibility that the investigation will also include Scranton City officials and others, stating simply that “the investigations are ongoing and will continue.” JT

2010-03-13T12:55:00.000-08:00

QUESTIONS FOR A SENATE CANDIDATE

We have a few questions we'd like to ask Scranton Mayor Chris Doherty who is seeking the soon to be vacated seat of State Sen. Robert Mellow.

Mr. Mayor, aren't you the same guy who pandered to Hillary Rodham Clinton in a St. Patrick's Day parade a couple of years ago? And aren't you the same guy who “hosted” a party on her behalf when Pres. Bill Clinton came to town?

Aren't you the same guy who wants to take credit for bringing the Medical College to Scranton? We thought that was Sen. Mellow, but we could be wrong.

Are you the same guy who needs a GPS to find the second floor of City Hall where Council meets weekly? And aren't you the same Mayor who addresses the State of the City at Chamber of Commerce digs instead of to the public? Do you pay rent to Austin Burke since you seem to spend so much time at C of C offices?

Are you the same Doherty who tried to talk a former Council member into staying on, despite his resignation for “inappropriate behavior”? And was it you who pulled a few strings to see that this “educator” got a better job, despite sexual misconduct?

Weren't you the same guy who “happened to be outside Council Chambers on the night Bob McGoff was “appointed” to City Council? Was it a mistake, or did you have Carl Greco show you the way to the 2nd floor?

Wasn't it you who was shocked that then Councilman Bill Courtright asked you “what are you doing here?” on that night? I seem to recall you almost going into shock that he had the “audacity” to challenge your appearance at a Council Meeting.

Were you behind the “illegal” smoking ordinance which was “prompted” by a group of high school students? Is it true that two of your “henchmen” on previous Council really were behind that move and that two West Scranton H.S. Teachers offered the suggestion which would include “extra credits” for the students involved?

Were you aware of the fact that these students were “dispatched” to drinking establishments, in violation of the law and worse, in violation of common sense and decency?

Are you the same guy who announced his “candidacy” for Governor, while still running for your third term as Mayor? And aren't you the same guy who stumbled over the term “brain drain” at a League of Women Voters event while ridiculing the other candidates who did the same?

Aren't you the guy who claimed to be a “friend” of Sen. Mellow even though he is the same guy who is under investigation for “political hanky-panky” involving taxpayer dollars?

Surely you are the same Mayor who cut vital services during your previous two terms, yet condemn the present Council for cutting back, using the same tactics on which you once prided yourself, are you not?

Can you explain how cutting back on police and firemen did not affect the City, yet cutting the salaries of the Police and Fire Chiefs is detrimental to public safety?

When you profess to be responsible for the “creation” of new jobs, did you take into account the new hires you made to “overload” the need for “management help” at City Hall? Are they part of your “program” which runs the gamut from 3,000 to 6,000 “new” jobs YOU created? Does that also include service persons at the numerous bars and restaurants, which seem to come and go as frequently as your changing diatribe? Of course you include the low-paying jobs which go along with the sub-contracts of “new development” in our City, right?

Are you the same Chris Doherty who lays claim to the “revitalization” of our downtown” which now has more vacancies than ever before, including vacant lots which once housed buildings? If so, you must also be the same guy who brags about removing “blight” and leaving behind vacant lots which are overgrown and a real eyesore?

You must be the same Mayor who has a revolving door to the courts, since you seem to file suit at the drop of a hat when YOUR agenda is challenged! Is there any end to your ongoing dispute with the police and fire unions, and your adamant refusal to accept the fact that your tax and spend policies have contributed to Scranton's continued slide?

Aren't you the same Chris Doherty who maintained a state of denial when your previous Council rode roughshod over the taxpayer, yet cry “foul” when the new Council challenges your tactics? And aren't you the guy responsible for a $300,000 tree house which “graces” Nay Aug Park?

We know you must be proud of the “new development” of certain areas of our city; the numerous K.O.Z.'s you encouraged; and the loss of so much of the taxpayers' money through “redevelopment loans and “give-aways” which you promoted, right?

And which Chris Doherty will show up in court on Tuesday? You or the real one?

NOW, PLEASE TELL ME AGAIN WHY I SHOULD VOTE FOR YOU TO SUCCEED MELLOW?
JT

2010-03-10T12:28:00.000-08:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

OPEN LETTER TO THE UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 March 10, 2010

Subject: Request for immediate investigation of misconduct by an elected official

The City of Scranton, Pennsylvania has been in a “distressed” status for almost 20 years, yet the present administration, under the present Mayor, Chris Doherty, has continued to borrow and spend, without regard to the taxpayer and citizens of this community.

Under our present strong Mayor, weak Council form of government, the administration has continued to ignore the inherent rights of the people to be informed by their elected officials.

This Mayor has apparently assumed the position that he, and only he, has the right to determine information which should be available to the general public, and refuses any attempt at transparency in government!

Our elected 5 member City Council has been ignored re their request for information regarding department heads, their activities, and the overall operation of city departments, their activities, and the general overall conduct of city business. Despite repeated efforts for this elected body to obtain information, the Mayor has now clamped down on information available to this officially elected legislative body and has continued to maintain that only the Mayor has any authority in the City of Scranton.

He continues a policy of “secrecy” regarding the activities of various authorities and other “appointed” bodies of government, claiming our “Home Rule Charter” affords him exclusive rights to determine the appointment and jurisdiction over these appointed bodies and that access to information regarding any Authority of the City of Scranton is not subject to public review.

Mayor Doherty has continued to violate the inherent rights of the citizens of Scranton with regard to the Constitution of the United States, and has been openly critical and less than forthright in dealing with the citizens and taxpayers of Scranton, Pennsylvania.

Questions regarding contract awards, the spending of taxpayer money, bond issues, and a number of other city business have been kept “under wraps” by this Mayor.

As recently as yesterday, Mayor Doherty has continued his policy of “I am the boss” and only “I make the decisions” for this city.

In view of the recent investigation of corruption and misconduct in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, our neighboring county, we respectfully request and demand that a thorough investigation of activities in the City of Scranton, Pennsylvania be launched and that the Department of Justice protect the rights of the citizens of Scranton, Pennsylvania from any further usurpation of our rights and to insure that the rights of our citizens be protected from any further violations of our “right to know'!

Respectfully submitted by this writer and this publication on behalf of the citizens and taxpayers of the City of Scranton, Pennsylvania. We are also urging our readers and any other concerned citizens to sign on to this request and to submit same to you at the above address. We are requesting immediate action for the Department of Justice!

Respectfully submitted,

Joseph A. Talamini, editor/publisher

To our readers: We urge you to copy this letter and to submit same to the Department of Justice, under your signature. According to law, the government must protect you from any retaliation or harassment due to your request for action by the D.O.J. JT

2010-03-05T02:45:00.001-08:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?

Scranton Mayor Chris Doherty, recently reelected for third term, running for Governor (oops), Lt. Governor (oops), State Senator (?)...Doherty to sue City Council (the people) over refusal to see things his way (budget...library board...etc.).....Doherty refuses to come to Council, says they must come to him....Doherty makes State of the City speech to C of C (not taxpayers)...Doherty insists on maintaining “dictatorship” rather than Mayor status.....

Democrats endorse “bad baggage” laden candidates, including Corcoran, “new” Commissioner O'Brien, and others, including Rep. Ken Smith who can't seem to understand that you have to pay your taxes, no matter what....

Shimkus, previous loser due to “misrepresentation” issues in last election, wants another shot...gets backing (?).....DiBileo, enters another race, then withdraws.....Lee Morgan, Democrat-Republican, any party candidate, still seeks any office available....19 yr. old ex-Jr. Council President still seeks to “educate” everyone based on his “experience and expertise” (couldn't win election as class president in high school)...

Scranton businessman, convicted felon, again convicted...this time on 16 federal counts of bank and credit card fraud....claims he is a victim...

Dudrich enters race against Staback...drops out....

Indicted Scranton Housing Authority Director David Baker, still facing 16 count federal indictment (suspended but still paid until recently) now decides to sue Hsng. Auth. & Board for “wrongfully removing” him from his position...after delaying his pending case with continued motions, now off the payroll, wants “justice” and his job back....

WELCOME TO POLITICS IN NEPA! “That's the way it's always been” mentality continues despite the rest of the political world changing all around us. Is it something in the water? Is it that our brains are clogged with dust from the coal mine operations? Or is it that area voters are considered absolutely stupid and incapable of thinking for themselves? In any event, this is the first lesson in Politics 101.

WAKE UP AND SMELL THE ROSES....we are still letting these political hacks run our way of life! Can't we find honest and sincere candidates or must we continue to recycle “losers”, “felons” and the bevy of “classless” acts that political leaders keep forcing down our throats?

Anyone deciding to enter any political campaign, without regard to party-line (there really is no difference), must first, and foremost, start out with a fresh new approach and at least have some credible credentials. Having been a friend of a friend, a former one-term elected official, or in the initial throes of your first term in office, are not adequate qualifications for elected office, unless of course you live in Scranton or Lackawanna County. Then, apparently, it doesn't matter.

Forget the fact that your “record” is based on falsehoods and political-hype...forget the fact that most of your “puppets” were bounced out of office recently because people were fed up with their antics....and most of all, forget the fact that you can't seem to gain any respectability because you really lack any respectability. That seems to be the basis for candidacy in this area. It doesn't have to be so!

We have been a distressed city for nearly 20 years, and no one has made any attempt to move us out of that status, nor has anyone come along to alleviate the tremendous tax burden placed on us! No one has yet to file for candidacy who has a proven track record that is “For the People”! No one has made any effort to communicate with the people who are the ultimate “deciders”, the taxpayer and voter. Yet, we are continually besieged by “endorsed” candidates who can't even decide where they live, what their platform is, or who they truly represent! And we wonder why Pennsylvania has become the laughing stock of the nation, and is the brunt of so many jokes that even television programs are created to poke fun at us?

Everyone used to make fun of the “inbreeding” of the Southern hillbillies, but it is apparent that the Keystone State has surpassed that label and can now claim title to that ignominious label, at least in terms of candidates, job opportunities, and political favors. Just look around you and try to find someone who is not related to someone else in office, someone who holds a management position in government, or someone who has a friend of a friend. Yes, it is true, there have been job creations...but they are contingent upon who you are related too, or to whom you are obligated.

If there ever was an issue which needed a major investigation, it is politics in the local area. For more than three years we have been trying to champion change on the local front; and for the same period of time we have been projecting the fall from power of those responsible for the corruption of our political system. Now, with at least the tip of the iceberg showing signs of federal action, “politics as usual” is still the norm.

The election of Barack Obama should have been a signal that the “old line politics” were a thing of the past, but somewhere along the line, the “grass-roots” movement fell apart. It certainly is time for a complete and new movement to challenge the charlatans and we strongly encourage those who were involved in Obama's campaign to make their presence known and jump-start another “new beginning”.The refreshing look of the new City Council is an indicator that at least one small group is trying to bring government back to the people. Now it is time for the rest of us to join in that endeavor and shake, rattle and roll. Our youth and our “educated” citizens need to take a stand and do their part in restoring government “of the People, by the People, and for the People”! Are you willing to do your part or would you rather continue the downhill slide of Pennsylvania, and especially NEPA?
JT

2010-03-02T13:21:00.000-08:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

LESSONS IN POLITICS 101

For the past 4 years we have been publishing our newsletter in Scranton and surrounding area. Over this period of time we have encountered many “politicians”, “wannabe politicians”, and those who want to learn about politics.

There are many young people out there who want to know but have never been afforded the opportunity to see the “inside” of politics. There are just as many who don't really want to know...they are the ones who vote blindly; follow party lines; or just vote for friends and others who promise the moon and never deliver.

At the urging of several of our readers, we are embarking on a few lessons in politics which you will never learn in school, or will never be taught because the “secrets” should not be known, according to those politicians and political observers.

During our more than 60 years in the political arena, we have acquired a great deal of knowledge, yet, at times, we have fallen into the trap of “signing on” with those who have been less than honest and forthright. Over the next few weeks, we will attempt to educate YOU on the pitfalls and snags YOU may encounter when involving yourself in the political process. Some of it may be very helpful; much of it will be common sense (lacking in most cases); but overall, it should help to educate YOU and others as to just what goes on behind the scene.

We will look at local, state and national politicians, and the political diatribe which is designed to encourage YOU, the voter, to “join” the “cast”, as “bit players” who are directly responsible for the outcome of the “show”, and its “stars”. The ultimate responsibility for the success or failure of any show falls upon those who either promote or pan the show. YOUR vote is the ultimate decider and it is incumbent upon all voters to know the real story. We will try to tell it here!

Our intent is to uncover the true story, and to tell it to YOU, so that YOU can become a more informed and astute player. Whether YOU choose to be a player, or a “ticket holder” (voter), the end result is equal to the amount of effort and know-how YOU put into making the “show” a success, or failure.

YOU can rest assured, we will be putting our heads on the chopping block, and while we don't particularly relish the thought of alienating or “pandering” to politicians, we do feel it is necessary to offer you enlightenment so that you can make a decision which will ultimately affect YOU and YOUR friends and neighbors. The truth can sometimes hurt, but facts are facts and the distortion of these facts is what leads to the ultimate fiasco which directly affects us all.

No one is immune from the reality of politics, and we hope that our efforts will serve to offer insight into the good, the bad, and the ugly of this “game”. No one is immune to the “diseases” which are spread by those who only seek higher office for their own edification. The only known cure for most of these diseases is an informed electorate. We hope to make YOU one of those “informed” voters.

One of my favorite lines is something I learned from a long list of journalists who were involved. It states simply. “a good journalist can be either your best friend...or your worse enemy”. That decision is YOURS, whether a politician or a voter.

In the next few weeks, we hope to teach our version of “Politics 101”, an inside look at things YOU will not be taught in any school or from any “party affiliation”. We sincerely hope that YOU will gain from our endeavors!

YOU may lose a few “friends” along the way, but you may gain some “new friends”. By keeping an open mind, and paying attention to the true happenings around you, YOU may benefit from these lessons, but only if you want to. To those who asked, we thank you for the opportunity. And for those who don't want to know, it is your decision.

“Don't kill the messenger” is the thought here. We will deliver! The rest up to you to!

Beginning with our next issue, we will take on the local scene. Shortly, we will take on the higher-ups and this will probably be our “swan song”! Join us and get involved, in “Politics 101”!

JT

2010-02-22T12:48:00.000-08:00

SOME READER INPUT

We shouldn't be, but we are, surprised by the number of emails we have received regarding Scranton's current situation. We can't print them all but we did single out three which caught our fancy.

From Tony Moody, retired U.S.Army Major; native Scrantonian and loyal reader:

“Joe: As a former resident (still registered voter) and frequent visitor to Scranton over the last several years, due to my overseas postings, I have not yet seen and improvement to Scranton's overall economic development during Mayor Doherty's reign. I still see dilapidated buildings throughout the City. Some roads are like tank trails. A struggling mall, crumbling infrastructure and a rise in violent crimes. Also, I think if you ask the man on the street, he is scratching his head about the job growth the Mayor brags about. My opinion of the Mayor is that he is a career politician who probably cannot handle a regular job and wouldn't a have a good idea if it bit him on the backside. The facts do not support his claims of progress. I think the people of the area should say, okay he is a nice guy, but he cannot get the job done. This is “deja vu” of the Jimmy Connors era. Talking loud and saying nothing! Like a dull knife just ain't cutting.” (ed note: Mr. Moody is a highly respected member of Scranton's Afro-American community and presently works for the U.S. Government in a sensitive position, based in Hamburg, Germany..he visits as often as possible and was in Scranton just recently.)

From 'You Know Who' (present City employee who asked that his name be withheld for fear of repercussions):

“I have worked for the City for several years and have noted that our Mayor seems to take his lead from the Chamber of Commerce. There is little doubt that he is an elitist and has little communication, if any, with Scranton citizens, except at election time. Quite frankly, I wish the citizens of this community would try to understand that Doherty is full of himself and offers nothing but a “snow job” in place of his purported “concern” for Scranton. Truth be known, his only concern is for Chris Doherty and his political ambitions. You are right on when you equate him with being an “Austin Burke puppet”! Please keep up the good work...you have a lot more fans than you realize, but most of us have to be concerned with any repercussions from the Mayor and his henchmen...sad, but true!” (ed note: the writer is a City employee of long-standing and fears his job may be in jeopardy if his name were used, however, we know him to be sincere and honest, consequently we agreed to not publish his name.

From a Scranton High School teacher (again anonymous but known to us):

Mr. Talamini: I applaud your stance and have been an avid reader of your publication for over 3 years. I would like to tell you, I know Janet Evans personally and have worked with her for many years. She is not only a very fine teacher, but is dedicated to her students and the citizens of this City. Janet is not, and never has been, one to slack off or to ignore her commitments. As for those who call her a “comp Queen”, they are so sadly mistaken. Mrs. Evans has had a very full plate, what with caring for her Mother and suffering pain from a serious back problem. For those who aren't aware, Mrs. Evans wears a custom-fitted back brace and is unable to spend any extended period of time on her feet...a necessary requirement for teachers. She has problems walking and suffers silently in pain. Her detractors should know Janet before attacking her. Whatever your political persuasion, the citizens of Scranton are lucky to have Janet Evans as a “watchdog”. I am a Republican but would not hesitate to vote for Mrs. Evans and offer her my full support. She is worthy of it, and hopefully, the citizens and taxpayers will soon realize that she is a dedicated and sincere civil servant!”(ed note: due to her status, the writer chose to request anonymity)

COURT TIME AGAIN, LAWYERS NEED THE $$$

Once again, our illustrious (?) Mayor is seeking to stroke his ego and probably will challenge actions by City Council in the courts. It is remarkable how this “hypocrite”, who claims to represent the City, is determined to turn Scranton into a dictatorship.

Yes, Mr. Doherty, you were elected again, but the question is by whom...voters or patronage friends? What you fail to realize is that the last council, under your “guidance” and at the urging of your puppets, Judy Gatelli and Sherry Fanucci, along with Bob McGoff, helped to make Scranton the laughing stock of Pennsylvania, if not the entire country.

Have you noticed that decorum and respect are back in City Council meetings? Have you noticed that the citizens voted out your two cohorts, primarily because they were tired of the lack of respect for citizens and their stupid antics at meetings? Did you notice that the “Legion of Doom” was started by one person, Bill Jackowitz, and is neither a group, nor an organized committee? Have you noticed that Scranton's taxpayers are taking to the new Council like a duck takes to water? And, have you noticed that we have noticed your only public appearances are for photo ops?

Now, your ego has been hurt by the majority of City Council rescinding your detrimental actions, including over-riding your veto. Yet, you continue to play the “only leader” of a 2nd class city which remains distressed and sinking deeper. To compare Scranton to other cities of similar size, you must also take into account that just because someone jumps off a roof it doesn't mean that Scrantonians should do the same.

Your choice to flaunt your “power” is ridiculous! This is not a case of “YOU AGAINST THE CITY”, rather it is a case of over-taxed citizens against YOU and your seemingly dictatorial mind-set. Voters sought change, and they got it on City Council. They also sought true leadership from you...and in that they failed. Must you continue to waste taxpayer dollars to further line the pockets of your “clique” at the expense of the people you are supposed to represent? Now you want more power? The only reason we hope you win Sen. Mellow's seat is to rid ourselves of your assinine lust for power and give Scranton a fair chance at recovery. PLEASE, CHRIS, GROW THE HELL UP! JT

2010-02-19T18:44:00.000-08:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 jtsopinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

BARLETTA, G.O.P. HEAVYWEIGHTS IN OLD FORGE

Hazelton Mayor Lou Barletta and a bevy of Republican heavyweights visited Old Forge Wednesday night to kick off a “petition” campaign. Meeting at Arcaro & Genetti Restaurant, the G.O.P. hopefuls
gathered signatures for the upcoming election from more than 100 supporters.

Barletta is challenging incumbent Representative Paul Kanjorski (D) and was the keynote speaker. The popular Hazelton Mayor outlined a program which called for reduced spending and fiscal responsibility and was loudly cheered by the assembled guests. He was introduced by Lackawanna County D.A. Andy Jarabola.

Others in attendance included former Old Forge School Board President Frank Scavo who hopes to gain the seat being vacated by State Sen. Robert Mellow, and others from Luzerne and Lackawanna County who are running for higher office.

The upcoming May primary election should prove to be a hotly contested matchup, on the Democratic side, with limited challenges among the Republican hopefuls. Barletta, who is making his third try for the U.S. House seat, has made considerable inroads and fell short in his last bid by a few percentage points. According to insiders, he has his best chance at unseating Kanjorski this time around.

DOHERTY SEEKING YET ANOTHER OFFICE

Scranton Mayor Chris Doherty has changed his mind again and has dropped out of both the Governor, and Lt. Governor races in favor of seeking State Sen. Mellow's seat. Since gaining reelection to the Scranton Mayoral post last November, the “changing” of priorities for Doherty has become the subject of considerable concern to many. It would appear that the vacillations of the Mayor are causing many to consider not only his sincerity, but his truth and veracity.

Citing his “record”, which by any stretch of the imagination is overly inflated and reeks of “political propaganda”, Doherty has made various claims of “job creation”, “proven leadership ability”, and a host of other “delusional” accomplishments. If the truth be known, Doherty's actions as Mayor have left Scranton far worse off than when he first took the office.

Scranton has regressed deeper into financial debt; has lost population, jobs and businesses; and has seen little if any progress on the economic front. Doherty's claims of establishing new jobs run the gamut from 3,000 to 6,000, depending on the day he makes a pitch. His claims of bringing Scranton out of distressed city status is nowhere near reality, and, in essence, he has managed to sink the City deeper into its financial quagmire. He claims to be the “sixth councilman”, but has never attended a meeting.

LACKAWANNA TAXPAYER ASSOC. RESETS METING

Due to a scheduling conflict, the Scranton-Lackawanna Co. Citizens and Taxpayers Assn. had to reset their meeting to next Thursday, Feb. 25th, in City Council Chambers at 6 p.m.

The meeting was reset after another City agency had scheduled their meeting for last night. The taxpayers group will hear from Frank Scavo, Republican candidate to succeed State Sen. Robert Mellow, kicking off a slate of interviews for challengers in the upcoming primaries.

The group is open to any and all who wish to join and the meetings are open to the public. Anyone needing more information should contact Ozzie Quinn, President of the Association at 570-347-8813.

SCRANTON CITY COUNCIL STANDING “TALL”

Scranton's City Council is standing firm against Mayor Chris Doherty's attempts to usurp their power as the official legislative body of the Electric City. Under the leadership of Council President Janet Evans, the “new” Council, which now has a “super majority”, has challenged Doherty on several fronts already, by introducing an ordinance to repeal the Library Authority ordinance established in last year's final hours, and by offering revisions to Doherty's budget for 2010.

The Council overrode a Doherty veto of the Library Authority ordinance, effectively eliminating that body, and made several changes to his budget, despite the Mayor's protestations.

Doherty has not met with Council to discuss the budget changes, but is threatening to go to court over any challenges to what he deems his right to exercise power over management of the City. His stance has been to sue over any challenges to his “executive authority”, despite laws which grant Council those powers.

Despite his claims that he is the “sixth councilman”, Doherty has never attended a City Council meeting and has continued to ignore any attempts to work with the “new” council. His record of suing anyone who challenges him, including abitration awards to police and fire unions, is indicative of his “power trip”, and he has failed to explain to either Council, or city taxpayers, his justification for continuing his “tax and spend” policies which have sunk Scranton deeper into debt.

As a leader, he has been reluctant to address any issues with the citizens of Scranton and is fumning over the challenges from the Council, which ia a major departure from the previous Council which was deemed nothing more than a “rubber stamp” body for Doherty;s agenda.

Under the leadership of Mrs. Evans, the new Council has been examining many “questionable” moves by the Mayor since he took office, including his “job creation” of many “upper level” management positions which have been viewed as being totally out of sync with Scranton's needs. The Council is also reexamining the activities of several Scranton Authorities which have had free reign without being subject to control by anyone at City Hall.

With the probability for investigations of corrupt practices within the City, Doherty continues to ignore the will of the citizens for “open and honest” government. Results from the last election should have alerted him to the fact that taxpayers want change! JT

2010-02-16T01:55:00.000-08:00

JTs OPINION An Alternative News Source 537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 Phone: 570-342-1033 Scranton, Pa 18509 email: JTsOPINION@gmail.com Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

ONE FOR THE MONEY…..TWO FOR THE SHOW…. HOW MANY MORE WILL WE SOON SEE GO?

Sen. Robert Mellow has announced his “retirement” from public office….Rep. Ken Smith has acknowledged he is more than 3 years in arrears on a “loan” from taxpayers..in other words, one down and another one on his way out…..Scranton Mayor Chris Doherty, candidate for Governor, Lt. Governor, State Senate, and who knows what else, may soon be “out”….are local politics really making the “turn”? We hope so!
Examining past history, it would appear that Mellow was a “friend” of C of C “boss” Austin Burke. It appears that Smith is a “friend” as well. We all know that Doherty is one of Burke’s buddies as well. Could it be that being a friend of Austin Burke is tantamount to political suicide?

For the past few years we have been hammering the fact that it is probably that corruption, maybe collusion, are a part of the NEPA political scene! To date, it would appear that we are being vindicated, and we fully expect considerably more “revelations” to come to light in the very near future.
It’s been very easy for the “locals” to accept the status quo…they’ve been doing it for years. Despite the obvious winds of change, local “ostriches” have continued to bury their heads in the sand. They reelected Chris Doherty to a job he obviously didn’t want…promoted him for a job which he certainly isn’t qualified for and can’t handle, and still they “stroke” him to the point he actually believes he is the local “messiah”.

Along comes an electorate which tired of the antics of Judy Gatelli and Sherry Fanucci, probably two of the main causes for the “Doherty agenda” to continue unabated. They elected two new City Council reps, Pat Rogan and Frank Joyce, along with incumbent Janet Evans. Then comes the appointment of John Loscombe to succeed Bill Courtright, the new head of the Single Tax Office, and BINGO, Doherty’s power base goes out the window, leaving only Bob McGoff to stand up for his “idol”, Doherty.

In less than 6 weeks, the “new council” has managed to make inroads which Doherty’s “select group” couldn’t accomplish in 4 years. Under the leadership of Council President Evans, City Council managed to repeal an unpopular “created” Library Authority”, “revise” the Mayor’s budget and propose cuts in the “gravy train budget”, and override a veto by “HIZZONER”. Additionally, they have managed to make the City Council “user friendly” to the citizenry, restore decorum to Council Chambers, and strike a blow for a return to democracy by eliminating a Police presence at Council meetings, and bringing in a Council Solicitor who does not believe he is “over and above” public scrutiny.

Now the Council is taking aim at the various “appointed City Authority” entities which have been “immune” from public scrutiny. It is about time that these groups answered to the taxpayers, and, though many of them believe they are “untouchable”, we fully anticipate the new “super majority” will put them in their proper place! THEY ARE CIVIL SERVANTS and are supposed to represent the will of the people.

It is refreshing as hell to see Scranton making it’s way out of the dark ages and into the 21st Century. Citizens are not only heard, but they are being listened to. Respect for speakers and Council alike is now in its proper place and, though less “entertaining” it does strike a major blow for taxpayers who have tired of the old school way.

The “tax and spend” policy is on its way out, and the concerns of the taxpayer are being addressed where they should be…in front of the legislative body of this City. It was a treat to watch Bob McGoff squirm and finally reveal his true allegiance to his “boss”, Chris Doherty, and to make a fool of himself by asking questions of the new Council which he ignored as a member of the old Doherty Council. “Did you check this out…do you know what their job is …do you know what they do…this smacks of politics”…he ranted, only to be put in his place when new Councilman Frank Joyce asked if he had answered any of those questions in the previous Council sessions. Sure, McGoff “rubber-stamped” everything Doherty wanted, without question. He went along with Gatelli and Fanucci in casting the standard 3-2 vote in favor of Doherty’s agenda. Now, the shoe is on the other foot, and “Squirming Bob” doesn’t like it one bit. He is now on the other end of the spectrum….the lone dissenter in the 4-1 vote against Doherty’s agenda. Poor Bob! He not only doesn’t like it, but seems ill-equipped to handle it. How does it feel, Bob?

With the “demise” of the Mellow-era, and the impending doom for the Smith-era, the new developments are shaping up as just the fore-runner of things to come. Rep. Kevin Murphy is working for the taxpayer, and is doin a good job, so far. Experienced civil servants Chris Phillips and Frank Scavo are mounting challenges for higher office, and a host of others are moving towards throwing their hats into the ring. Our only advice to them is simple ..Be honest..be upright…and avoid Austin Burke and the C of C. Represent the people…not the power brokers. The people are ready for change and YOU can lead them out of the “dark ages”.

As for Pat Rogan, and Frank Joyce…keep up the good work and we hope that someday soon YOU will be moving up the ladder. You’re on the right road and both of you have bright futures, if you keep up the work you’ve just begun. “Jack” Loscombe… we wish you nothing but the best and hope you’re EARNED pension will be reinstated. It is unjust, but “that’s the way it’s always been>” Changes are in the offing and you deserve better consideration. Janet…Dear Janet….keep going and don’t let the “barbs” interfere. We all know where they’re coming from. Losers are losers, but they still do HIS dirty work! JT

2010-02-12T14:21:00.000-08:00

JTs OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 Phone: 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 email: JTsOPINION@gmail.com Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

ONE FOR THE MONEY…..TWO FOR THE SHOW….
HOW MANY MORE WILL WE SOON SEE GO?

Sen. Robert Mellow has announced his “retirement” from public office….Rep. Ken Smith has acknowledged he is more than 3 years in arrears on a “loan” from taxpayers..in other words, one down and another one on his way out…..Scranton Mayor Chris Doherty, candidate for Governor, Lt. Governor, State Senate, and who knows what else, may soon be “out”….are local politics really making the “turn”? We hope so!

Examining past history, it would appear that Mellow was a “friend” of C of C “boss” Austin Burke. It appears that Smith is a “friend” as well. We all know that Doherty is one of Burke’s buddies as well. Could it be that being a friend of Austin Burke is tantamount to political suicide?

For the past few years we have been hammering the fact that it is probably that corruption, maybe collusion, are a part of the NEPA political scene! To date, it would appear that we are being vindicated, and we fully expect considerably more “revelations” to come to light in the very near future.

It’s been very easy for the “locals” to accept the status quo…they’ve been doing it for years. Despite the obvious winds of change, local “ostriches” have continued to bury their heads in the sand. They reelected Chris Doherty to a job he obviously didn’t want…promoted him for a job which he certainly isn’t qualified for and can’t handle, and still they “stroke” him to the point he actually believes he is the local “messiah”.

Along comes an electorate which tired of the antics of Judy Gatelli and Sherry Fanucci, probably two of the main causes for the “Doherty agenda” to continue unabated. They elected two new City Council reps, Pat Rogan and Frank Joyce, along with incumbent Janet Evans. Then comes the appointment of John Loscombe to succeed Bill Courtright, the new head of the Single Tax Office, and BINGO, Doherty’s power base goes out the window, leaving only Bob McGoff to stand up for his “idol”, Doherty.

In less than 6 weeks, the “new council” has managed to make inroads which Doherty’s “select group” couldn’t accomplish in 4 years. Under the leadership of Council President Evans, City Council managed to repeal an unpopular “created” Library Authority”, “revise” the Mayor’s budget and propose cuts in the “gravy train budget”, and override a veto by “HIZZONER”. Additionally, they have managed to make the City Council “user friendly” to the citizenry, restore decorum to Council Chambers, and strike a blow for a return to democracy by eliminating a Police presence at Council meetings, and bringing in a Council Solicitor who does not believe he is “over and above” public scrutiny.

Now the Council is taking aim at the various “appointed City Authority” entities which have been “immune” from public scrutiny. It is about time that these groups answered to the taxpayers, and, though many of them believe they are “untouchable”, we fully anticipate the new “super majority” will put them in their proper place! THEY ARE CIVIL SERVANTS and are supposed to represent the will of the people.

It is refreshing as hell to see Scranton making it’s way out of the dark ages and into the 21st Century. Citizens are not only heard, but they are being listened to. Respect for speakers and Council alike is now in its proper place and, though less “entertaining” it does strike a major blow for taxpayers who have tired of the old school way.

The “tax and spend” policy is on its way out, and the concerns of the taxpayer are being addressed where they should be…in front of the legislative body of this City. It was a treat to watch Bob McGoff squirm and finally reveal his true allegiance to his “boss”, Chris Doherty, and to make a fool of himself by asking questions of the new Council which he ignored as a member of the old Doherty Council. “Did you check this out…do you know what their job is …do you know what they do…this smacks of politics”…he ranted, only to be put in his place when new Councilman Frank Joyce asked if he had answered any of those questions in the previous Council sessions. Sure, McGoff “rubber-stamped” everything Doherty wanted, without question. He went along with Gatelli and Fanucci in casting the standard 3-2 vote in favor of Doherty’s agenda. Now, the shoe is on the other foot, and “Squirming Bob” doesn’t like it one bit. He is now on the other end of the spectrum….the lone dissenter in the 4-1 vote against Doherty’s agenda. Poor Bob! He not only doesn’t like it, but seems ill-equipped to handle it. How does it feel, Bob?

With the “demise” of the Mellow-era, and the impending doom for the Smith-era, the new developments are shaping up as just the fore-runner of things to come. Rep. Kevin Murphy is working for the taxpayer, and is doin a good job, so far. Experienced civil servants Chris Phillips and Frank Scavo are mounting challenges for higher office, and a host of others are moving towards throwing their hats into the ring. Our only advice to them is simple ..Be honest..be upright…and avoid Austin Burke and the C of C. Represent the people…not the power brokers. The people are ready for change and YOU can lead them out of the “dark ages”.

As for Pat Rogan, and Frank Joyce…keep up the good work and we hope that someday soon YOU will be moving up the ladder. You’re on the right road and both of you have bright futures, if you keep up the work you’ve just begun. “Jack” Loscombe…we wish you nothing but the best and hope you’re EARNED pension will be reinstated. It is unjust, but “that’s the way it’s always been>” Changes are in the offing and you deserve better consideration. Janet…Dear Janet….keep going and don’t let the “barbs” interfere. We all know where they’re coming from. Losers are losers, but they still do HIS dirty work! JT

2010-02-12T14:17:00.000-08:00

2010-02-08T13:35:00.001-08:00

COREY OUT - VIRGINIA IN

Corey Platt and Chris Doherty have parted ways and Doherty's sister, Virginia McGregor, is back at the helm of her brother's “Gubernatorial” run. Platt, who had been campaign manager for the Mayor, has returned to Missouri, according to reports.

McGregor, who has had a hand in her brother's campaigns since he first ran for office, is considered to be the “real brain” behind the man, and it is no surprise she has reentered the scene. No one is saying, but it is widely believed that McGregor's presence had a lot to do with Platt's departure. According to our contacts, Virginia has always had the “final say” and is known to be the decision maker and “advisor” to her brother.

Her reentry into the forefront has literally been known for some time, but now, it is official. Some claim the Mayor is seeking another full-time campaign manager, but these sources also say any new “leader” will still have to contend with McGregor.

At present Doherty is playing a “will he or won't he” game in seeking the Governorship, but it is widely believed he is just trying to get his “name” recognized in the Commonwealth. He is not considered a serious contender for the State leadership, either as Governor or Lieutenant Governor but is positioning himself for higher office in Harrisburg, though nobody can pinpoint his goal.

Questions have arisen about his “campaign strategy” and much of the questioning falls back on McGregor's perceived “high handed” tactics. Many are of the opinion she has been a “tad” over zealous, to say the least, and one source claims she may very well be the subject of a potential investigation similar to the one being conducted regarding vendor donations to Doherty's campaigns.

“HIZZONER” VETOES LIBRARY AUTHORITY REPEAL LAW

As expected, the Mayor has vetoed an ordinance which called for the repeal of an ordinance which established a new Library Authority, passed recently by a 4-1 majority of City Council. The issue should come to a head at Tuesday night's City Council meeting when the Janet Evans led Council is expected to override the veto. It would be the first time the “super majority” has an opportunity to stand up to the Mayor.

Should the Council overrule the Mayor, it is expected Doherty, known for his “my way or the highway” tactics, is expected to seek redress in the courts. The move is expected to be made in keeping with Doherty's contentious arguments that he, and only he, knows what is best for Scranton's taxpayers.

Council voted to eliminate the Library Authority at the behest of a majority of citizens who felt that Scranton does not need, or want, another autonomous self-ruling “authority” which could lead to further taxpayer debt The creation of the Library Authority was “ramrodded” through in December, by a lame duck Council thought to be under Doherty's control. Questionable filing of the necessary paperwork to the State, and the timing of such, at the last minute, was further highlighted by the sudden transfer of deeds for library properties to the “authority” which immediately moved to increase insurance on the buildings. Citizens were shocked by the move, which included transfer of deeds for the Albright Library and other city-owned properties to the new “Board”. Most expressed concern that the “new authority” would soon move to seek funding for Doherty's desire to build anew multi-million dollar library on the South Side of Scranton.

The decision by Council to repeal the ordinance establishing the authority was based on a court ruling which allowed Forks Township to remove its Sewer Authority. That ruling was cited by Council Solicitor Boyd Hughes as precedence for the Council to vacate the previous ordinance establishing the new Library Authority. Doherty apparently saw it differently and will probably call on his “legal beagles” to challenge the move. Time will tell, but we will be watching it closely!

WATCH FOR THE RATS TO DESERT THEIR SINKING SHIPS

With the feds closing in on Scranton and its alleged political corruption, we wouldn't be the least surprised to see a sudden “desertion” of “Doherty loyalists” from city hall, other appointed jobs, and many Board members of the various authorities in the city. Watch as they begin to try to avoid “the other shoe falling” , citing health reasons or the desire to spend more time with their families. The previously believed “untouchables” will be looking to save their own hides.

As the pending trial of disgraced Scranton Housing Authority Director David Baker gets closer to reality, we fully expect to see the sudden exodus of many others who are beginning to feel the heat. The Baker case has been stalled for months, due to legal maneuvering, but it is noteworthy that not one of the original charges in the 16-count indictment has been dropped. He faces federal charges for wire fraud among many other alleged offenses said to have been committed while he headed SHA.

In the interim, feds are still looking at former County Commissioner Robert Cordaro, and minority Commissioner A.J. Munchak though no charges have yet been filed. It is widely believed that actor Paul Sorvino, recip.ent of some $500,000 of taxpayers' money for production of an “alleged” movie, is also being investigated. Sorvino, who recently divested himself of local ties by selling his property\, has literally “taken the money and run”. To date, he has been less than forthcoming regarding the deal!

Insiders say the local “balloon” is very near to bursting and they predict a massive fallout, possibly even surpassing the debacle in Wilkes Barre and Luzerne County. Apparently the “that's the way it's always been” political philosophy prevalent in this area is about to end....very abruptly.

OUR CONDOLENCES TO THE HAGGERTY FAMILY

We want to express our sincere condolences to the family of long-time Dunmore civic leader and educator Joseph Haggerty who passed away last week. Mr. Haggerty was a beloved coach and leader in the education field and a long-time supporter of higher education and athletics. Son Kevin, is a candidate for the 112th District seat presently held by State Rep. Ken Smith. JT

2010-02-03T10:48:00.001-08:00

OPEN LETTER TO MAYOR DOHERTY

Dear Mr. Mayor:

You were recently reelected to serve a third term as Mayor of Scranton. Prior to that time you offered that you would make a run for the Governor's seat, and you apparently have decided to continue that ambitious move.

I believe it is incumbent on you to answer a few questions, for the benefit of the citizens of Scranton, and also for the populace of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Perhaps the first move would be to outline why you absolutely refuse to acknowledge the constituents whom you purport to represent From experience it seems that all your “official” pronouncements, including your candidacies, have been made before a select group of individuals, usually at a venue which is limited to attendees either associated with you, or affiliated with the Greater Scranton Area Chamber of Commerce. These include your “State of the City” addresses.Is it that you feel superior to the citizens of Scranton; that you feel we are unworthy of your presence; or is it that you are just an egocentric who has delusions of grandeur which, in your opinion, place you above the common man?

Next, perhaps you can outline to the public why you seem to have an aversion to making any appearances at City Hall, which incidentally is where your office is located. Has it ever occurred to you that since the voters of Scranton elected you they might expect to see you doing business at that venue? Have you ever thought about making an honest appearance at City Council meetings, save for the “convenient” appearance you made when you cast the deciding vote to install Bob McGoff as a City Council replacement for a resigned Council member who left in disgrace? Wasn't it a stroke of luck that you “just happened” to be present outside Council Chambers when the deciding vote was needed? Frankly, I'm surprised you remembered where Council Chambers were!

And how about your “swearing in” ceremony? Shouldn't that have taken place at City Hall instead of at the Mellow Auditorium of Lackawanna College? And shouldn't it have been scheduled at a time other than the same time Council members were sworn in? Of course that might have taken the spotlight off you. I should have known better than to ask that of one who is so “self exalted”!

Incidentally, how about answering a few questions about your math? It seems you have “created” several thousands of job, are pulling Scranton out of”distressed city” status, and are highly qualified to seek the Governorship (or Lt. Governorship) of Pennsylvania, at least in you own mind. We have heard claims of 3,000 jobs created, which turned into 6,000 jobs, and which now seems to be 5,000 if we are to believe your statement at your recent appearance with the other Democratic candidates for Governor. It would appear that they would not move that venue into the local Chamber of Commerce office, opting instead to schedule it for Harrisburg (which incidentally is the State Capitol).

Please tell us which “number” you are going to settle on! Also, could you please tell us your definition of “job creation”? In our book, a created job is one which employs someone for an extended period of time and provides that individual with the opportunity to settle into a lifestyle, seek appropriate housing, and provides family stability. If I hire a kid to shovel snow from my sidewalk, does that qualify as a “created job” in your book? If a contractor employs workers for a 2-3 month period of time, does that qualify? Or is it that the developer would have used those employees in any event?

In keeping in line with YOUR interpretation of “job creation”, does using a City employee to chauffeur you around, including trips to Harrisburg for political purposes, qualify? Of course you couldn't possibly be misusing your office for political purposes, could you? By the way, can you show us even 1 job which you “created” other than at Scranton City Hall, on the City payroll?

As for our moving “out of distressed City status”, perhaps you would be willing to explain that claim. Aren't we deeper in a financial hole, further in debt, and seeing less revenue than in previous years? According to all the statistics we have seen, save those proffered by Chamber of Commerce leader Austin Burke, Scranton is in worse condition now than it has ever been. Roadways are in deplorable condition; the infrastructure is crumbling (aside from selected 'downtown' areas); only certain areas are selected for removal of “blight” as determined by “someone” (whose qualifications are in question); and there doesn't appear to be any rush by outsiders to move into Scranton! We also note that numerous vacancies exist in the “downtown” area, especially store fronts, office space, and what is rapidly becoming the “Ghosttown Mall”. There also doesn't seem to be any rush for “new businesses”, other than an assortment of bars and restaurants, to move into the area. And, we notice, you fail to comment on those which have fled the City, usually owing a ”bad debt” accrued at taxpayers expense. Perhaps you have a secret plan to recover some of those losses. Could you tell us about those plans?

You are doing an excellent job of bringing in more non-profits, and providing them with space which could be utilized for housing, schools, recreation, or “permanent” businesses. Of course in the interim, you are making room for further deterioration of housing; increased “tax exempt” land use; more K.O.Z.'s (if that's possible) and continue to pat yourself on the back. Perhaps we are missing the point. Clarify please?

As for our “alleged” brain drain, which you so masterfully stumbled over during the League of Women Voter's presentation of Mayoral Candidates recently, do you understand what brain drain is? Do you understand that we are providing facilities for higher learning, at citizen's expense, only to see those graduates hightail it out of town for “greener pastures”, including our own local potentials?

Now, suddenly, after eight years in office as Mayor, YOU have determined that Scranton needs a new library; ramrodded a ridiculous Library Authority ordinance through at the last minutes of YOUR outgoing City Council, and have managed to move faster than Mercury to see that the “Authority” was created, deeds were transferred, and YOUR new Board is off and running. Of course you never thought to ask the citizens what they wanted, did you? But then, YOU are above that. What could these “peasants” know? If they had any common sense (look up that term) they would leave YOU and your cronies to make those decisions. The audacity of “thinkers” to repeal that ordinance!!!

Lastly, but certainly not leastly, perhaps you could explain why you consider yourself a “salesman”, to quote you? Do you really believe that, or is that part of your “persona” which you have now adopted? I hate to tell you this, sir, but being a “snake oil” salesman went out in the 19th Century. People are a little more sophisticated now, and far more intelligent than either YOU or Austin Burke give them credit for. Perhaps YOU and Mr. Burke could buy a horse and wagon and take your “sales pitch” on the road. I'm sure you could find greener pastures for your diatribe. The voters of Pennsylvania are not that naïve and you need to have a back-up plan. We intend to keep as many voters informed as possible, and will continue to “exploit” YOUR efforts to our readership, which incidentally includes voters and taxpayers all over the State.

YOUR mission, should you choose to accept it, is to prove your “leadership” of a distressed city before you try to maneuver a whole State into that category. As I told you once before, you should have learned a lesson from your buddy Don Cunningham (former Mayor of Bethlehem). He tried the same route you are pursuing, and the results were not as satisfying as you have led yourself to believe. Maybe you could open a bar, or restaurant, in the City. You could call it “DOHERTY'S BAIT & SWITCH”!

JT

2010-01-27T12:05:00.001-08:00

HEAD 'EM OFF AT THE “PASS”!!!

In a brilliant maneuver, reminiscent of the “real” political game, Scranton City Council dealt a major blow to the forces behind the unpopular “Library Authority”, suspending Council Rules to obtain a “third” and final reading on the ordinance to repeal the ordinance establishing the Authority.

Pushed through in a last ditch effort by the previous Council, the establishment of the Library Authority
made it to the State offices, in a questionable move, but the Council essentially overturned the move by a surprise 2nd reading of the ordinance to repeal, then, in a motion by Councilman Frank Joyce, decided to have a 3rd, and final reading, by suspending the rules to allow for the final vote.

Over the objections of the lone “Doherty puppet”, Bob McGoff, the group voted 4-1 in favor of the new ordinance. McGoff questioned Council Solicitor Boyd Hughes as to whether or not the vote was subject to appeal, but the attorney said flatly, “NO”, citing legal precedent in a Forks Twp. Case (2000) which effectively eliminated a sewer authority ordinance.

Mayor Chris Doherty now has 10 days to either sign the legislation or veto it, but in either case, Council has the upper hand since it can override any veto by a “super majority” vote. The move left the audience “confused”, on the most part, but the end result was met with approval by the majority of those in attendance, and, if our e-mails and phone calls today are any indicator, a resounding defeat for the “politics as usual” form of government employed by the Administration.

The “new” Council has made great strides forward since taking office earlier this month. Citizens are applauding the efforts of Council President Janet Evans and Councilmen Pat Rogan, Frank Joyce, and Jack Loscombe.

“Finally, we have a City Council which is for the people”, proclaimed one citizen. “What a great feeling to attend these meetings and be able to relax and have a sense that City Council is working to make Scranton a better place”, said another. ECTV viewers, who watched the proceedings on TV, were just as vocal, most applauding the seemingly dawning of a “new era” in Scranton politics. We had calls from many viewers, from throughout the area, who expressed sincere hope that Scranton is now “moving onward and upward” as opposed to the previous Council which was met with disdain by most.

It will be interesting to see what Doherty's next move will be. He obviously will not be happy, now that one of his pet projects has gone down to defeat, and we fully expect him to try to outmaneuver Council on this one. In any event, the Doherty forces have to be reeling over this defeat since they have been so used to having their own way.

If things continue to progress, as anticipated, we can all look forward to “a new revival for the area”, a
caller asserted. “It is a pleasure to watch Council meetings without the “fear” instilled by those on the previous “circus” atmosphere which made many hesitant to attend meetings”, she added.

“Now, if only the feds would expand their investigations into our area, we may see Scranton regain the status of an honest city, free of corruption, graft and nepotism,” a Moosic resident said. “It is about time the pressure was put on these charlatans who 'talk the talk' but can't, or won't, 'walk the walk”, was the comment from a West Side resident. “The people of this area can really have some hope now,” he added.

“Hats off to Janet, Pat, Frank and John”, was the statement of a South Side resident. “I've been here all my life and I can honestly say I now have hope for the City”, she said. “Thankfully the negative force of Judy, Sherry and others before them is gone,” she concluded. “Please pass my thanks on to them, and my best wishes for their continued success.”

WAS A “CERTAIN” PARTY IN A “COVER-UP” ACCIDENT?

Many questions are being asked about a “certain formerly prominent citizen” who is alleged to have been involved in an accident in the early morning hours of Sat., Jan. 15th. According to our information, this “lady” had been a patron at a local restaurant and was loud enough, and obnoxious enough to warrant her “server” walking off the job.

At approximately 1:30 a.m. this “lady” was alleged to have struck a pole on N. Main Ave. with her vehicle, causing extensive damage to the pole and causing the air bags on her vehicle to deploy. It is further alleged that she may have been “under the influence” at the time, but we have been unable to substantiate any claim of this.

Was the incident “covered-up” by police, or did it really happen in the first place? According to one “witness” the incident did happen, and questions of her “sobriety” were raised. “We don't doubt that it will be a police “cover-up” because of her connections,” the witness asserted.

“If it were anybody else, it would have been splattered all over the newspaper,” she concluded. Anyone care to comment or come forth with any further information? If so, let us know!

SHOE'S ON THE OTHER FOOT

Interesting to note the reactions of so many who had been “for” the previous Council. Now that the “new” Council is in power, with a super majority elected by the voters, the shoe appears to be on the other foot.

Detractors, who can't understand, to quote Judy Gatelli, “the people voted, and they (the new council) won. Get over it!”, are flocking to defend the “old” group.

It is one thing to be informed, and bitter. It is another to be “uninformed” and stupid. To bring you up to date, the majority of Scranton voters decided to oust Judy and Sherry, and to replace them with Pat Rogan and Frank Joyce. It sure appears the voters wanted change and they got it. They also can look forward to a “citizen friendly” City Council, without the badgering and snickering of the previous one.

Welcome to Scranton, the City that never wakes up! JT

2010-01-27T12:02:00.001-08:00

2010-01-20T02:04:00.000-08:00

JT'S OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa. 18509 jtsopinion.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

DOHERTY UNCOVERED

Finally, the real Chris Doherty, Scranton's Mayor for the past 8 years, has been uncovered and it is long overdue. Thanks to Scranton City Council (the new one), and the overly welcome “open” format of the meetings, the truth is emerging. Doherty IS NOT what people have been led to believe.

The truth began to unfold when Council introduced an ordinance repealing the unpopular “Library Authority” bill which had been rushed through during the meetings of the previous Council. The new ordinance would totally eradicate Doherty's “ramrod” bill which had been rushed trhough by present Councilman Bob McGoff and deposed Councilwomen Judy Gatelli and Sherry Fanucci.

Over the objections of Councilwoman Janet Evans and former Councilman Bill Courtright, the “authority” bill was passed and board members were nominated (without public input) and a proposed $17 million new library was envisioned for the South Side. The loud objections of city residents was totally ignored by the old Council, even though Lackawanna County Commissioner A. J. Munchak appeared before Council and told them flat out that the County could not, and would not, support the project.

Tuesday night, after the “new ordinance” repealing that action was introduced, Councilman McGoff did his best to untrack the move, citing the “need” for an authority and claiming that no new library was proposed under the old ordinance. His efforts were shot down when Mrs. Evans, now Council President revealed that she and new Councilmen Pat Rogan and Frank Joyce had met with Doherty and “hizzoner” told them that “I want a new library and I need the authority”. McGoff, caught in his own web, twisted and squirmed as he continued his rhetoric against the new ordinance and cast the lone vote against its introduction.

Part of the Gatelli, Fanucci, McGoff triumvirate which had catered to Doherty's every whim, he found himself in the uncomfortable position of being the lone dissenter and showed his discomfort visibly. For the past two years, he has joined in what had become the standard 3-2 vote for Doherty's agenda and now is on the “other side”. It is obvious that during his previous time on Council he learned nothing since he continued to rant that this Council should consult with those chosen for the new Board
and others who “know” what's good for the city. What he fails to understand is that the people who really should be consulted, the electorate, obvious were not happy with the “old way” and literally “bounced” Gatelli and Fanucci from their lofty perches. McGoff should be grateful he didn't have to face the unhappy citizens or he too would probably be on the outside looking in. Hang on, Bob!!!

Prior to the regular meeting, Council met publicly in caucus with Keystone Business Products representatives Timothy Kelly and Jim Babinski over their complaint that they had been denied a contract to provide office equipment to the City despite being low bidder by over $57,000 on a plan which had been estimated to cost over $200,000. Offering a visual presentation, the Keystone reps produced evidence that their bid was within the guidelines, and had met all the requirements as outlined by the City. Attorney Gene Hickey, who sat in on behalf of the City, claimed Keystone had not met those requirements, proposing “generic” equipment, and, based on a Monroe County decision to opt out of a contract with Keystone, he had determined that the bidding process should be revisited and new bids put out.

Keystone refuted those claims, saying there is no such thing as a “generic” copier, and that Monroe County had opted out of their agreement half-way through the contract because they could not keep up with the costs. Kelly pointed out that Keystone is now “eating” the cost of that contract, to the tune of some $5,000 per month.

Answering questions posed by Council, Keystone said they have contracts with the University of Scranton and several major corporations and have never been questioned before. Kelly went on to say that a rebidding process will hurt his company for obvious reasons and that they may or may not offer a bid on the proposed contract.

Keystone, a Bethlehem-based company, has an office in Scranton and employs 3 people here. They are a primary dealer of Lanier office machinery products and also offer other machines, if requested. We have had experience with digital copiers and found little difference in the products, opting for the lower overhead machinery. Maintenance and service are the keys, and if the equipment is not abused, will normally stand up to any job, regardless of the volume. We found Atty. Hickey's arguments very weak.

NEW COUNCIL ATMOSPHERE REFRESHING !

The atmosphere at meetings of the newly-seated City Council has changed considerably. Attendees at the meetings found it refreshing to hear from their elected officials, and to get answers to their questions, without fear of being “talked down to” or :demeaned by those at the Council dais.

Under the leadership of Council President Janet Evans, and with the friendly demeanor of Pat Rogan, Frank Joyce and “Jack” Loscombe on Council, citizens were visibly more comfortable when they spoke and applauded several times during the proceedings when Council offered “friendly” comments. The previous Council meetings had become a source of ridicule and disdain due to a “Jerry Springer-like” atmosphere. What TV viewers did not see was the scorn and contempt heaped on citizen speakers by certain members of the old ]Council, often leading to the “circus-like” atmosphere.

Gone is the “police presence” and in its place is a “citizen friendly” group of elected officials who know it is their “job” as it was so succinctly put by Mrs. Evans. It would appear that Scranton now has an elected body of officials who not only will listen to what citizens have to say, but will hear their complaints, and act on them! Thank you Council for bringing government back to the people!

JT

2010-01-18T20:52:00.001-08:00

A LOOK INTO NEPA'S FUTURE

Over the past weekend we had a chance to meet with some of the great mystics of the past and asked for their input on Northeast Pennsylvania's future. This is what was gleaned from those chats.

Nostradamus told us that future archeologists will discover the ancient city of Scranton, once the pride of the Northeastern area. Buried under thousands of tons of debris, mostly from an overload of excessive building projects, they discovered what had once been known as Nay Aug Park. It was identified by shards from what had once been known as “Doherty's tree house”. Remnants of “downtown” businesses were also uncovered, revealing numerous old bills, long past due, for economic development loans. Broken dishes and rotted pots and pans indicated that there had once been restaurants in the area. Several buildings, identified as parking garages, had collapsed and the only identifiable piece of evidence was a sign proclaiming the “Steamtown Mall”. Remember that?

Further evidence revealed that at one time there had actually been residents in the area, but they had apparently forsaken the once proud city long before its collapse. Other pieces of evidentiary note included college textbooks, lab equipment and other objects believed to have been a part of the city's culture. Shredded tax bills were found, but only bits and pieces were identifiable. “Tax Sale”, “Foreclosure”, “For Sale”, and “For Rent” signs were strewn about. One tax bill indicated that the city had collapsed shortly after a 725% tax increase had been sent out. Archeologists said the bill was dated 2017 and was stained with what was believed to be human tears.

Virtually no sign of human life was evident, save election posters which indicated two candidates making their 14th consecutive unsuccessful run for office. Only “Vote For Lee” and “Doug” were discernible. The rest of the posters had deteriorated.

Another ancient seer, believed to have been a former Mayan priest, said “Harrisburg”, once the capitol of Pa., had also been discovered, but evidence of humans were found. He said one was identified as Governor Corbett (Steve), and several hundred state representatives remains were anong the ruins. According to him, the city collapsed under the pressure of political “gas” which had exploded, causing a massive hole in the ground when the annual budget, totalling some 4,000 pages, caught fire. Some of the human remains had evidence of very deep pockets, but nothing was found in the State Treasury.

We also consulted with the late psychic Jeanne Dixon, whose take was a little different. She claimed a wealth of evidence would be discovered, showing the area collapsed from the weight of political rhetoric. She said bank building vaults would reveal a dearth of unpaid OECD and CDBG loans, and further evidence that heavy tax bills contributed to the demise of the city. Sewer Authority bills and unpaid City and County tax bills led her to believe the weight of the unpaid bills was too much.

On the plus side, Edgar Cayce said he believed the demise of the area was caused by a growing feud between Jesuits and the scientific community over control of the last scrap of land, a 16 inch piece of sod between what had been Jefferson Ave. and Linden Street. He says he felt the war for control of the land had been the prime cause of the area's disasterous collapse. He likened it to the “greed” of the ancient rulers of the European continent who refused to attempt any mediation of their long dispute.

Recovered tapes from Pat Robertson and Rush Limbaugh, two “paragons of virtue”, were said to contain predictions that the area would suffer great tragedy due to the apathy of the citizens, and the fact that people had continued to blame the Bush-Cheney administration for the world's problems. Both “commentators” were actually right, for the first time, but were later proven wrong since they had both been listed as major contributors to one political party. It seems they had both employed “spin doctors” from the Bush-Cheney era.

One local psychic, unidentified, claims the area went under from the weight of the St. Patrick's Day Parade debris, especially the beer cans and trash left behind by the hundreds of thousands who attended due to early bar openings (2 a.m.) and the late closing hours (9 a.m. two days later).

A copy of the local newspaper was discovered, almost intact, with nearly a third of a page of classified ads. Almost 60 percent of those were for Sheriff's sales of foreclosed property, some 27 percent legal notices of increased taxes, 9 percent for houses for sale or rent, and the remaining 4 percent were split between lost & found and 1 Help Wanted ad which was for an internet job in Delhi, India.

Old Forge residents were believed to be eyeing the sites for use as a landfill. Taylor Borough officials had claimed title to the devastated area after Wal Mart expressed a desire to erect a new store between what had been Green Ridge Ave. and Lackawanna Ave. and running from Keyser Ave. to the Moscow line. At least one Dunkin Donuts shop was also planned for the site.

We'll get back to you after our next session with these sages of old. Meantime, we hope you enjoyed reading about what the “future” of our area might hold. Anyone finding a trace of the DPW, please contact us. We want to turn over the evidence to the Authority on Authorities, the body charged with overseeing the various Authoritys created by former Mayor Chris Doherty. LOL!

JT

2010-01-15T22:16:00.000-08:00

COMMISSIONERS WANT MCDOWELL OUT

Lackawanna County's majority Commissioners called for County Controller Ken McDowell to resign after he filed a lawsuit seeking to restore two spots in his office.Mike Washo and Corey O'Brien seek McDowell's resignation, claiming he is “completely out of touch with reality, and dismissed the lawsuit as “reckless litigious behavior” on McDowell's part.

The Commissioners had eliminated the two positions as part of the 2010 budget which eliminated some 16 positions overall. McDowell claimed the Commissioners never asked for his input and were trying to eliminate county checks and balances by moving the controller's office functions to the commissioner controlled Office of Revenue and Finance.

McDowell has been under fire before, for his management of the Single Tax Office which was subject to an F.B.I.investigation in 2008. Though no charges were filed, the Single Tax Office has been noted for being in a state of disarray, including the “discovery” of a $12 million bank account, and some $1.6 million alleged to be missing. This all happened ,“allegedly”, on McDowell's watch.

Larry Moran, the county's general counsel for litigation, says he intends to ask the court to hold McDowell personally responsible to reimburse taxpayers for the cost of his lawsuit. David Rinaldi, solicitor for the controller's office says the commissioners were “arbitrary and capricious” re their funding of the controller's office.

SCRANTON SEWER AUTHORITY RATES “ON HOLD”

Officials at the Scranton Sewer Authority are said to have placed the proposed flat rate billing policy on hold, according to Eugene Barrett, executive director of the authority. The move follows a public outcry over the proposed policy, including an overflow crowd at City Council's Tuesday meeting, and a call for Barrett to appear before Council in caucus, though Council has no control over the authority.

The new plan calls for residential customers to pay a flat rate, $90 every quarter, as opposed to the present rate which calls for usage-based billing.

While many households would see a reduction in costs, the elderly and singles would see an increase in costs. This caused a public outcry and the Sewer Authority has been inundated with complaints, as well as the appearance of many disgruntled residents at Council.

Authority vice-chairman Francis Nooney, the only board member to vote against the proposal, said “electric, gas, water, oil...you pay by consumption...It's not right.”

DUNMORE HAS 10 APPLY FOR 2 VACANT COUNCIL SEATS

Joseph R. Formica, Michael Hayes and Michael F. McHale were defeated for seats on Dunmnore Council in the primary, but they joined seven others in filing for two seats vacated by resignations from Thomas Hennigan and Michael Cummings.

Hennigan and Cummings resigned last week after a firefighter filed a federal lawsuit which ended in a verdict against Dunmore and the councilmen. The verdict also found Dunmore guilty and awarded the firefighter $150,000 in compensatory damages, $1,000 of which must be paid by each of the two councilmen who resigned.

Both Council Vice President Paul Nardozzi and Councilman Sal Verrastro expressed disappointment that only 10 candidates had applied. Both had expected more interest in filling the two positions. The 10 candidates will be interviewed this week, with an appointment expected to be made at the Jan. 25th meeting.

Others who filed for the two vacancies include John Acculio, John Arduino, Damon Brown, Santo Cancelleri, Francis P. Durkin and John G. Moffitt. Council has 30 days in which to fill the vacancies which will last until the November 2011 municipal election.

Dunmore has been plagued by long-standing financial problems and voted to raise taxes by 20% in 2010. Layoffs and salary cuts which have affected nearly all departments, as well as a pending referendum required to raise taxes for fire protection in 2011, also must be faced.

FORMER ASSOCIATE DOING WELL IN USAF

AB Robert Maciejeski, former associate editor and “right hand man” graduated from the Air Force basic training course at Lackland AFB, Texas and is assigned to helicopter maintenance school at Ft. Eustis, Va. Bob was formerly associate editor of S.A.L. and literally our “right arm” prior to enlisting in the service. He is a graduate of West Scranton HS and attended Marywood University.

Bob is learning maintenance on the Sikorsky HH60 helicopters and probably will be assigned to Nellis AFB, outside of Las Vegas, upon completion of his training. His assignment to that base will more than likely put him into “search and rescue” operations, since Nellis is one of the prime S & R bases of the USAF. He is the son of Bob & Priscilla Maciejeski (West Side).

He recently visited the Washington, DC area and took a tour of the White House and Arlington National Cematary. Bob maintains constant e-mail contact with us, and with some of his former teachers at West. He passes along his best wishes to his friends and colleagues in Scranton and looks forward to leave time prior to reporting to his next assignment.

Bob is a prolific journalist and our thanks go out to him for his assistance and his invaluable contributions to our “learning” and for helping us to keep our computer in working order. We wish him all the best and feel comfortable knowing he is a part of our military and “has our backs”. How can we replace him? Good luck, Bob!

JT

2010-01-07T19:55:00.000-08:00

Jt'S opinioN
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa. 18509 jtsopinion.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

WE'RE SINCERELY SORRY!!

Yes, we sincerely apologize to those who have read our Scranton-at-Large newsletter and found it disturbing. Due to those complaints, we are conducting an investigation to determine who the culprit, or culprits, are who have forced these folks to read S.A.L. We were unaware that reading S.A.L. was mandatory and that anyone would be subjected to continue reading our opinions. Especially if they disagree. Please contact us if you have any information about this issue.

PA. DISTRICTS 112 & 115 CHALLENGERS

Rep. Ken Smith (D-112) and Rep. Ed Staback (D-115) will be facing opposition in 2010. Kevin M. Haggerty has announced he will challenge for Smith's 112th District seat and has opened offices in Dunmore at 214 E. Drinker St. and Scranton's South Side, at 408 Cedar Ave. Paul Dudrich officially threw his hat into the ring against Staback but has not yet announced any office openings.

Both candidates are expected to be joined by others in the coming weeks, but as yet, we have not received any official word. Haggerty is a relative newcomer, while Dudrich previously ran against Staback but lost that initial bid. We expect to profile both candidates in an upcoming issue.

LUZERNE COUNTY'S WOES CONTINUE

Luzerne County voters, already plagued by federal investigations, indictments and resignations of judges, a County Commissioner, and other officials, were shocked when it was announced that Jerry Bonner, county jury commissioner, offered his resignation. Bonner, who joins over 25 other County officials on the “trouble list”, pled guilty in federal court to passing a bribe. He had been reelected in November, despite being under federal indictnment.

SINGLE TAX OFFICE MISSING $1.6 MILLION

Former Scranton City Councilman Bill Courtright, now Tax Collector, received his fisrt shock when it was revealed some $1.6 million dollars is missing and unaccounted for at his new job. An independent audit recently completed, revealed the missing funds, believed to be “untraceable” due to poor records management and alleged to have happened under the “guidance” of Ken McDowell, now County Controller. The missing funds were part of a $12 million bank account which came to light last year. Calls for an investigation have been sounded by Mayor Chris Doherty and Councilwoman Janet Evans.The money is believed to have been from wage taxes from 1997 to 2004.

NEW SCRANTON COUNCIL MAJORITY TAKES OFFICE

Incumbent Councilwoman Janet Evans was elected Council President, and newcomer Pat Rogan vice-president at the reorganization meeting. They were joined on Council by fellow “team member” Frank Joyce, effectively taking away a majority previously held by supporters of Mayor Chris Doherty. Bob McGoff is the only carry-over from that support group.

The new council is expected to be rounded out when a replacement is chosen to succeed Bill Courtright who resigned to take his new position as head of the Single Tax Office. His successor will be chosen from a list of approximately 25 candidates who submitted applications for the job. It is anticipated that the new member of council will be selected following interviews on Friday and Saturday with a target date for the selection of January 12th, date of the next council meeting. The interview process is open to the public but citizens will not be allowed questions. Times are 4:30 pm on Friday, and a starting time of 9:00 am Saturday.

The replacement will fill the unexpired term of Courtright, and is expected to give Evans and her “team” a super majority which could make matters difficult for the Mayor. An expected revisiting of the Doherty budget, and a recently enacted “new library” issue should be on the upcoming agenda since both items were disputed by Evans in the previous Council.

A “honeymoon” period is expected for the popular new Council President, but nothing lasts too long in Scranton politics and a backlash might be forthcoming in coming weeks. Dissenters will probably make their presence known, replacing the anti-Doherty forces which made city council meetings contentious and a form of “entertainment” for TV viewers.

We'll reserve judgement and afford the new council ample time to get comfortable.

MORE COVERAGE OF NEPA AREA DUE

In keeping with our announced policy, we will be presenting more complete coverage of area municipalities in both Lackawanna and Luzerne Counties, as well as coverage of state and national news.

A limited number of ads will be accepted, and we anticipate reader input which we will print, if fit, subject to editing.

We are also attempting to establish legitimate contacts at various city halls and with local residents who wish to contribute verifiable news. Anyone interested should contact us as soon as possible.

SIDE NOTES OF OUR OPINION

While we don't wish anyone harm, we do look forward to the eventual case of laryngitis for Rush Limbaugh and for Dick Cheney, former draft dodging vice-president, to shut up and go away. We really have had our fill of these two “paragons” of virtue.

Now if only someone could event a brain transplant for Sarah Palin we would say our wishes are complete. JT

2010-01-04T04:35:00.000-08:00

JT's OPINION
An Alternative News Source
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa. 18509 jtsopinion.com
Joe Talamini-Editor/Publisher

Welcome to JT's OPINION!

We're back, after an extended hiatus. We welcome those of you have have been reading Scranton-at-Large, and offer our apologies to those of you who have been patiently awaiting our return.

Recently, we decided to change over and return to JT's Opinion in order to offer our readers a wider base of information. Our local, regional, national and foreign readers can expect us to do our best to bring you at least one weekly newsletter, but we do reserve the right to offer special editions as the situation warrants.

Additionally, we encourage our readers to contact us with your input and we will endeavor to answer as many of you as is reasonably possible.

Our intent is to keep you informed on current issues, offer our opinions, and to give you as diverse and concise information on all issues we deem newsworthy. We will include politics, social issues, and a forum for candidates for public office. Within reason, we will also keep you up-to-date on criminal prosecutions and investigations involving your area of interest.

Thanks for bearing with us and for your loyalty. We hope to accept a limited number of ads for inclusion in our newsletter, at reasonable rates, and will offer “print” copies at a nominal fee.

Anyone interested in advertising rates should contact us at the above address. Print copies will be mailed on the day of publication ($1.00 US) and are subject to a minmum of 13 issues so as to better enable us to maintain a database.

Ads will be limited to no more than 18 per 4-page issue and will require a guarantee of 4 ads per contract with prepayment required. All ads will remain in our archives and will be included as agreed per contract. We reserve the right to reject any ad based on content and ask that you remember, we are a family-oriented publication and will accept no ads which can be construed as offensive. Each ad will be 1 ¾ in. x 2 in. and larger ads will be charged accordingly. Renewal preference for ads will be accorded previous advertisers and all others are on a first come-first served basis. No changes will be allowed per 4 week period except in the case of our error. Thanks for your interest and we look forward to your ad.
JT

2009-11-08T13:26:00.001-08:00

JT'S OPINION
The alternative source for State, National & World News
537 N. Washington Ave. # 502 570-342-1033
Scranton, Pa 18509 email: jt's opinion@gmail.com
Joe Talamini, Editor/Publisher
__Vol. 3 No. 1 Nov. 8, 2009___

PENNSYLVANIA is preparing for the 2010 election, and it would appear that voters are dissatisfied with their legislature as well as their Governor. After the fiasco of a late budget (over 100 days late), the voting public has been taking a closer look at Luzerne County corruption; investigation into "hanky panky" in Lackawanna County; and a dearth of other Federal investigations into Pa. politics. Judicial, legislative and a host of local officials are in deep trouble, and we wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see the ouster of several long-term (and presumably firmly entrenched) politicians as the 2010 election season begins to unfold. After a long, and seemingly endless nap, Keystone State citizens are awakening from a self-induced slumber and they apparently don't like what they see. At least two major players, Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D) and State Senator Robert Mellow of Lackawanna Co.'s 12th District are in for the fight of their lives. A new Governor will also be elected, and, if voter action in neighboring states (NJ & Va.) are any indicator, Republicans may take back the state. Should be interesting!

ON THE NATIONAL SCENE, it is about time that former V.P. Dick Cheney learned a lesson he should have learned a long time ago, "Stand Up To Be Seen..Speak Up To Be Heard, and (for God's sake) Shut Up To Be Appreciated"! Cheney's rantings, strangely absent when he was in office, are beginning to wear very thin on the public, especially after his track record is diametrically opposed to the beliefs of the public he was supposed to represent. Cheney was absolutely "traitorous" in outing an undercover operative, placing her in dire jeopardy, and then lying to the press and public about his actions. He was probably the "prime mover" in two unpopular wars, both of which are still ongoing, (Iraq & Afghanistan) and has been less than forthcoming on his involvement in numerous other unpopular decisions. While the body count continues to rise in both wars, Cheney's friends at Halliburton have continued to prosper. Big bucks at the expense of human lives is a less than an admirable result, and the former V.P. should speak out on his covert involvements rather than trying to cover the mess!

RUSH LIMBAUGH, THE BIG "BLOWFISH" , continues to spew hate for anyone who doesn't agree with his "expertise". Our question is simply this; Where in the hell did this jerk gain his "knowledge" and who appointed him as the spokesman for the American public? Sadly, many radio talk show listeners buy into his rhetoric, but few, if any, examine his alleged credentials. Granted, "fat boy" is very eloquent, but where is the substance to his diatribe? Now, he is being joined by fellow "talk show host" Glenn Beck, another talking head who was a wannabe and now is being hailed (mostly by himself) as another "expert". How come neither of these two has ever come up with an original idea but merely mimic the rhetoric of their party lines and the power brokers. Talk about shills? Not that the "left wing" talk show hosts are any better. What ever happened to the input of the "callers"? Is it any wonder that "talk shows", even on the local level, have become a forum for "instant geniuses" to vent at the expense of those who have legitimate questions, and no answers? The TV glamour set, mostly talking heads, lend little to the credibilty of "speaker forums", and the state of "news reporting" has fallen by the wayside. Come on, guys, give your callers a chance. There are many people who disagree with you. Don't just cut them off and continue to spout your particular brand of venom. Your opinion is just that, "your opinion", and your callers should be allowed to express their "opinions". That's the name of the game!

IS THE AMERICAN PUBLIC finally getting fed up with the obscene salaries of CEO's, corporate executives, sports figures and so-called entertainers? You can bet your sweet "bippy" they are. It is noticeable to everyone but the "powers that be" that the average American is being shut out of the game by inflated costs, to benefit the salaries paid to some of these jokers. Show me a .257 hitter who could command anything but a token raise; a defensive lineman who can't tackle but can demand a 7 figure salary; a corporate executive who is entitled to mega-million dollar bonuses for producing profits while outsourcing jobs and quality; a "singer" who can't carry a tune who can command hundreds of thousands for a less than stellar performance? There is unquestionably billions of dollars in profits being made on their behalf, but shouldn't the "benefactors" sink a majority of that profit back into their venues, rather than asking the paying public to subsidize their follies? It is absolutely assinine to expect the public to pay for new stadiums, corporate percs, lousy performances and the like, while at the same time reaching into the pockets of those who are paying the tab! $5.00 for a 10 oz. beer; $3.50 for a soft drink or hot dog; $65 for a "seat" at a concert or sports peformance; $3 for a box of popcorn? Come on, America, it is our fault for buying into these ploys! Are we really using common sense by subscribing to the stupidity of subsidizing tobacco growers then paying excessive taxes for the privelege of using their product? Is it logical to pay $3.00 for a gallon of gas to move a $30,000 car which was manufactured outside the U.S. (to save costs for the manufacturer) and has a life span of less than 10 years? Does it make sense to continue paying higher prices, more taxes, and receiving less for our dollar at a time when seniors and the majority of citizens can barely feed themselves? Let's use some common sense and start to take these "rip off" artists to task for their "Ponzi schemes". It's been done before (sugar prices, meat prices, etc.) all were lowered when the consumer fought back. If the only thing that affects "them" is a hit in their wallets, then let's make "them" feel the pain! There is plenty of money to go around! Just start taking it out of the hands of the "big guys" and put it back into the hands from which it was "stolen"! Until we get back to the basics, this country will continue to falter, while the rest of the world passes us by. Let's get real about our country!

LEST WE FORGET there are a lot of "ex-pats" who have moved out of the U.S. for political, economic, and reasons of general overall dissatisfaction! Many of them are ex-service poersonnel and retirees who have found "greener" pastures abroad. It is a shame that these fine folks have been forced to leave their homeland in search of a better and more practical way of life. True, many of them chose to leave for other reasons, but this is a reversal of the "immigration" which built this great nation. We are actually "exporting" one of our most treasured possessions....experienced and knowledgeable people who should be utilized for the benefit of our country, not relegated to a position of being the benefactors for rebuilding nations. Is it fair to them, or to us, to see this "brain drain" and dollar drain sent back to other countries, when they could be enjoying the benefits of the "better" way of life for which they expended so many years of hard work and education? We have several friends abroad who just can't see their way back "home" when the new benefits they are enjoying should have been available to them in this, their homeland! Obviously, they are more aware of things than the average American. Could it be that they have been far more observant than those of us who choose to stand and fight against the terrible injustice of "earning" retirement then having it taken away?

JT's OPINION is owned and published by JT PUBLICATIONS. The opinions expressed herein are the sole opinions of the writer! This newsletter is available on-line, and, print copies are available by writing us at: JT Publications, Suite 502, 537 N. Washington Ave., Scranton, Pa. 18509. Please send a self-addressed stamped envelope and $1.50 per copy (U.S.). Unsolicited submissions are subject to editing and we encourage letters to the editor at the afore-mentioned address. Joe Talamini, Editor/Publisher

2009-08-06T13:02:00.000-07:00

JT'S OPINION
The Alternative Source for National & World News
537 N. Washington Ave. Suite 502 Scranton, Pa. 18509 email:scrantonatlarge@gmail.com tel. 570-342-1033
Joe Talamini - Editor/Publisher

WELCOME TO THE ALL-NEW JT's OPINION

JT's OPINION is your alternative source for National & World News as seen through the eyes of Joe Talamini, a semi-retired journalist. Having spent more than 60 years as a newspaper reporter/editor; a magazine editor, asociate editor & publisher; and an editor and publisher of newsletters. Mr. Talamini has a well-rounded background in all phases of journalism, including business, politics, local, state & national news, sports and entertainment. He has been a mainstay on the political scene for numerous years and has been associated with publications from New York City to California and many ports in between.

A co-founder of one of the first national newsletters aimed at investment opportunities in unknown fields, he has been instrumental in bringing "news you can use" to the forefront of national attention. His experience ranges from newspapers to trade magazines, and from small entertainment publications to metaphysical and business & industry interests. Not one to shirk controversy, he has been associated with such notables as former political leaders Sen. Warren Magnuson (chmn of the Senate Commerce Committee); Rep. Millicent Fenwick (R-NJ); Rep. Robert (Bobby) Kennedy; and local and State politicians throughout the U.S. He has been closely affiliated with internationally known figures in various fields, including Dr. Elisabeth Kubler-Ross, Harold Sherman, Marcus Bach and such industry giants as General Dynamics, Global Marine, Lockheed, and others. In addition, he was an associate of Fred Astaire, John Gary (singer) and numerous entertainment and sports figures, as well as having been founder-editor-publisher of radio talk show newsletters.

He feels qualified to present his opinions on numerous and varied subjects, including national and international news, and keeps abreast of happenings through former associates and current "connected" sources. Joe Talamini has recently edited local and area newsletters in and around the Northeast U.S. and has decided to return to his first love, world-wide general news reporting.

JT's OPINION will be published 48 times per year and will include photos as well as news. Limited advertising will be accepted and the publication will be confined to "on-line" internet availability. It will contain current news and will look at controversial subjects which the current news media generally ignores. In addition, a weekly "pod cast" is planned and will be available to subscribers only.

Subscriptions will be offered at $15 per quarter, on a trial basis, and annual subscriptions will be available for $45 (U.S.). Advertising will be available on a first come-first served basis and is limted to 18 ads per four-page newsletter. Subscriptions (check or money order only) should be sent to JT's OPINION, Suite 502, 537 N. Washington Ave., Scranton, Pa. (USA) 18509. Advertsing rates avaiable at same address. Unsolicited contributions are subject to acceptance and will not be returned. Contributing editorial content must be accompanied by personal information, including personal credentials and contact number and address. Initial Issue date - Sept. 4, 2009!

WE LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING YOU AS A READER/ADVERTISER of JT's OPINION! Joe Talamini, editor/publisher

2009-01-29T17:23:00.001-08:00

JT’s OPINION
JT’sOPINION, a JT Publication, is an Alternative News Weekly, edited and published by Joe Talamini, a retired journalist, and covers national and world news and politics.

537 N. Washington Ave. # 502, Scranton, Pa. 18509 www.JTsOpinion.com (570)342-1033 Joe Talamini, Editor/Publisher Jan. 29, 2009

“SMOKE & MIRRORS” PLEA FAILS,
ILLINOIS GOVERNOR IMPEACHED

By a unanimous vote of 59 to 0 the Illinois Senate voted to impeach embattled Gov. Rod Blagojevich on Thursday. Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn was immediately sworn in to as Governor.

Blagojevich made a 40 minute plea before the Illinois senate, but his last-ditch attempt to save his career was rejected by the senators. Obviously suffering from “foot-in-mouth” disease, the former Governor had made a whirlwind tour of New York TV news shows and declined to appear at his hearing until the last minute. He was unable to sway the senators and now faces probable indictment and criminal trial,

Blagojevich had been cited for a “pay for play” scheme, allegedly secretly taped by federal investigators, in an attempt to sell the appointment of a successor to former Illinois Senator Barack Obama, now President of the U.S. “Blago” brazenly appointed Ill. Attorney General Roland Burris to fill the vacancy, riling many politicians and “tainting” Burris’s appointment. The U.S. Senate reluctantly accepted the appointment.

The “former” Governor was arrested Feb. 9th on federal corruption charges.

OBAMA STIMULUS PLAN PASSES HOUSE
WITHOUT REPUBLICAN BACKING

President Barack Obama’s economic stimulus bill ($819 billion) was passed by the House by a vote of 244 to 188. Not one Republican voted for the bill, and 12 Democrats sided with their GOP counterparts. Obama had sought to gain bi-partisan support, but Republican lawmakers rejected his plea. The bill now goes before the Senate which is expected to pass its own version of the plan. The two bodies will then seek a compromise effort before presenting the measure for Obama’s signature.

The Senate version is expected to adjust the bill to include holding down the alternative minimum tax for many middle-class Americans. Despite numerous “questionable” stimulus provisions, the newly-elected President was successful in pushing the bill forward.

Billions of dollars have been earmarked for “infrastructure” and other questionable spending, but the rush to pass the bill overshadowed most reservations. Obama had set an $850 billion limit but the Senate version is expected to push the bill upwards of $900 billion. However, the measure is expected to be placed on Obama’s desk for signing by mid February. Many Republicans called the measure a “tax and spend” program with little attention to needed stimulus for the economic doldrums Obama has inherited.

POSTAL SERVICE CRYING AGAIN

The U.S. Postal Service is proposing to cut back mail deliveries to 5 days a week, instead of the present 6 day service. Citing ballooning costs, USPS is making another bid for sympathy in what is becoming an annual event.

If the Postal Service wants to cut back on “losses”, why don’t they raise the rates on other mail services for which the 1st class mailer has been paying? Too many “flyers”, 2nd, 3rd and 4th class mailings are the real culprit, yet 1st class customers pay for these overburdening costs. “Junk” mail, scorned by most consumers, is the real problem. Let these “junk” mailers pay for the increasing costs and the excessive weight the postal workers must carry. Another cost-cutting measure would be to eliminate, or at least reduce, the political “spam” which gives our legislators such delight in affording them the opportunity to pat themselves on the back continuously.

If these elected officials want to get their message across, they could eliminate the “need” for fancy newsletters and brochures. Most of these mailing could be reduced to simple info letters printed on normal 20lb stock paper, saving hundreds of millions in costs.

Let’s call a spade a spade! There not only is no need for these fancy and heavy publications, as any trash man will tell you, most of which wind up in their domain, unread. As for advertising brochures, again, the majority are discarded rather than being read, and the resultant cost is always at the expense of the 1st class mailers. Let these “violators” pay their fair share. After all, they are in the “profit” business!

Newspapers and magazines are also responsible for the excessive costs, as are the majority of catalogs, all of which are produced to enhance the pocketbooks of “for profit” entities. Why should “Mr. & Mrs. Consumer” pay for those mailing costs?

IS POLITICAL CORRUPTION RAMPANT AND UNCHECKED?

Illinois, Pennsylvania, Texas, Ohio,etc. have all seen their share of political corruption, of late. This is not a new phenomenon, but lately, it has been making headlines around the world.

Federal investigators are uncovering political shenanigans all over the country, on the federal, state, county and local level. Besides the scandal in Illinois, Pennsylvania has had two “respected” judges removed for political misdoings; several “local” agencies are under severe and intense scrutiny; and at least one HUD investigation has resulted involving alleged fraud by a Housing Director. Several Senators, House members and state officials have been the subject of removal, being forced to resign, or generally under investigation.

Major corporations, including banks and financial services institutions have been cited for various corrupt practices, and the list goes on and on. Usually, the perpetrators receive a “slap on the wrist” for their transgressions, and the practice continues, often prolonged due to bureaucratic red tape. Is it any wonder that the average U.S. citizen is thoroughly disgusted with government?

And lets not forget the untold thousands who have chosen to become expatriates rather than live with this sad state of affairs. Isn’t it about time we started to hold these perpetrators feet to the coals and make them pay when they are “caught”? They did swear an oath to uphold the laws, not to break them or bend them to fit their individual needs and wants! Let justice prevail!

“DON’T ASK, DON’T TELL” POLICY BOUNCED

President Obama has done something about the ridiculous “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy of the U.S. military. Finally, someone has had the guts to stand up to the homophobic radicals who believe a person’s sexual orientation merits scrutiny as to their patriotism.

In just about every country in the world, including our British and Israeli allies, openly gay individuals are an integral part of the military. Literally thousands of these folks have suffered indignities at the hands of the homophobes and the religious right, to the detriment of our military infrastructure. How humiliating for our great nation.

I served in the military with a lot of “gay” servicemen and women, all of whom pulled their weight equally, and many of whom gave their lives in the service of their country. Never did I find any cause or reason to question their patriotism. I did, however, find many cases of homophobic jerks who really were one step removed from playground bully status, who couldn’t cut the mustard,

In view of the fact that we have openly gay Senators, Legislators, Governors, clergymen and women, its about time we stopped this stupidity and allowed these people to live normal lives with the same rights enjoyed by all of us.

If the military is really concerned about our moral welfare, why did they impose a “do not pursue” policy with regards to deserters from the military? And which legislators were responsible for this travesty? A deserter is one who chooses to “run away” from the responsibility which he or she chose to accept when they swore allegiance to our country.
In wartime past, deserters were apprehended, tried, and imprisoned, or shot. Isn’t this a time of war (Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.) and should these deserters be allowed to roam our streets, becoming homeless burdens on taxpayers? How about the effect on their morale?

Where oh where are the legislators who are supposed to protect our country, alongside the military, which they are supposed to oversee? Will the “geniuses” who enacted this “do not pursue” policy come forward and stand up for their beliefs? We doubt it! But at least we now have a President who is not afraid to take on the “righteous” establishment. Perhaps he will rectify this super injustice as well. How about it Mr. President? What do you tell the dedicated servicemen and women, and the families of those who paid the “ultimate” price? We will keep on top of this problem until it is resolved properly to the satisfaction of every veteran who served his or her country honorably! We hope every veterans group in the country will take up this cause and seek to have the policy reversed, either now or at the next election for those who voted the policy in! Wake up America!

CAN WE REVERSE THE OUTSOURCING OF JOBS?

For several years now, the U.S. sat by and watched the outsourcing of hundreds of millions of jobs. Now, due to economic mismanagement, many of the remaining jobs in this country are being eliminated, to the detriment of the American working stiff.

Can we reverse this policy and bring our jobs back where they belong? Of course, we can, if we can get these politically correct leaders to act like legislators, instead of enablers. Auto industry jobs, textile jobs, electronics jobs, and scads of others have been outsourced to Latino countries, India, Pakistan, Asia, etc., while the American worker has suffered the indignity of losing his income or facing the loss of the very things he has worked so hard to achieve. While these nations have thrived, to the detriment of American interests, our government has permitted these jobs to leave our country and make other countries, and politicians, rich while we have hit really tough times.

Major corporations have thrived by paying considerably reduced wages, while maintaining or increasing profits, and embellishing the “job creation” fallacy which we, the American people, are supposed to be the beneficiaries of. Try contacting a major corporation and you wind up having to “interpret” what the other person is trying to say. Remember the day when you called an office and talked to a live person who could help you solve your problem? Now you need a staff of interpreters to find the answer to a simple question, that is if you can reach anyone.

Sure there are lots of jobs, i.e. agricultural workers, menial service jobs, etc. which are filled by “immigrants”, but how about the more desirable jobs for which we have paid thousands to learn, through overpriced technical schools and sadly inadequate “institutes of higher learning”? Where have these “better” jobs gone? Why do our nation’s industrial giants pay much lower wages, for foreign help, yet continue to charge us higher costs for products produced in foreign lands? And why do these companies seem to “go under” and blame it on our economic woes? Do you know of any CEO, or major top executive, who is struggling to make ends meet; standing in line to sign up for unemployment, or food stamps; struggling to pay a mortgage or rent; worrying about feeding his family, raising his kids, or providing them with basic needs?

This is our plight, and we lay the blame directly at the feet of the industrial giants and the politicians who let this happen. When I cast my vote, I choose to elect an official who has my interests at heart, not those of some foreign interests. Let’s get our own house in order, and then we can help those who live in distant lands and need our help! “Feed a man a fish, and he will eat today! Teach him to fish, and he will eat everyday!” With the hundreds of millions we send to “overseas” sources, how much of it really reaches the needy, and how much of it winds up in the hands of corrupt governments? Let’s hope our new President and his staff will take a long, and seriously hard look at our “policies’!

FINALLY, LET’S WORRY ABOUT WHAT OUR POLITICIANS AND LEADERS DO, NOT WHAT RUSH LIMBAUGH OR OTHER “GENIUSES” THINK THEY SHOULD DO! THESE “EXPERTS” LEND LITTLE TO OUR NATION, OTHER THAN SELF-PRESERVATION OR EGO STROKING!

JT